What 'shock claim' about McGuinness?
Saturday, April 26, 2008
A documentary by the veteran broadcaster and journalist Peter Taylor has
suggested that Martin McGuinness, deputy first minister and former IRA
commander, knew in advance about the Provos' plan to bomb Enniskillen. Some
11 Protestant civilians were murdered in the atrocity that has come to be
known as the Poppy Day bombing.
Newspaper articles in advance of the documentary screening earlier this week
flagged up this 'shock claim' about McGuinness.
Here's what shocks me.
That anyone would imagine for a moment that the IRA leadership at that time
wouldn't have had an inkling what was about to happen.
Come on — are we really trying to kid ourselves that the Provie hierarchy
spent the years of the Troubles sitting in some ivory tower discussing
Marxist theory and admiring their Che Guevara poster collection, while
somewhere out there various bands of faceless, nameless, entirely freelance
murderers were bombing and shooting without any liaison whatsoever with 'the
army council'?
Martin McGuinness, by his own admission, was a top terror commander. Are we
expected to believe that the only 'operations' he ever had knowledge of were
attacks on armed members of the security forces?
The law of averages alone would suggest otherwise. For more than 30 years
the IRA carried out countless attacks just like the Enniskillen bombing. Mr
Taylor, writing on the BBC website, says: "Many have long thought the
(Poppy Day) bombing must have been an unauthorised, one-off operation by a
local unit, believing it to be inconceivable that the IRA would mount such
an attack on civilians as they remembered their dead."
'Many' Peter? Who are these 'many'?
The fact is that the bombing — to use the media cliché — bore all the
hallmarks of an IRA operation precisely because it was just such an attack
on civilians.
The dead the victims had been remembering were what the IRA would describe
as 'British Crown forces'.
That made anyone at that parade 'legitimate targets'. Civilian casualties
were inevitable on the day — you don't have to be an explosives expert to
know that placing a bomb behind a wall along a parade route is more likely
to kill bystanders than it is to kill marchers.
Indeed 'many' might argue Peter, that civilians were precisely the object of
the attack. As they had been so often in the past.
Enniskillen wasn't the Provos' first atrocity. It wasn't their last. It
wasn't the only time they massacred Protestant civilians.
Or targeted them deliberately. If Enniskillen was a mistake, what about all
the other mistakes that went before?
And if Mr McGuinness and his fellow IRA chiefs knew about Enniskillen surely
they also knew about the other bomb — the one that didn't go off that day?
The roadside bomb aimed at Protestant children marching in a Girls' and
Boys' Brigade parade.
What set Enniskillen apart was simply the international backlash that caught
the IRA by surprise. And the shocking thing now is not that people are
finally, finally beginning to address the question of who knew what about
what was going on in Northern Ireland. But that for so very long it has
suited the process better here that we didn't ask those questions.
We subject the terror chiefs on all sides to far less scrutiny and criti
cism than your average binge-drinking celeb. We allow a band of gangster
yahoos on one side to style themselves as 'brigadiers' and report their
every pompous utterance as if it's Nelson at Trafalgar.
On the other side we go along with the fiction that a man can rise to the
very top of a terrorist gang without being party — or in any way culpable —
for any of its 'operations'.
Here's an interesting point, though. If the men at the top of the IRA now
regard those 'operations' as so reprehensible that they don't want to be
associated with them — where does that leave the people who carried them out?
Don't ask Martin McGuinness. He told Peter Taylor he had no prior knowledge
of Enniskillen.
And Gerry Adams? Gerry, of course, wasn't even in the IRA ...