Chomsky: why far right must be challenged
Saturday, 31 October 2009
Far-right political groups could use rising poverty to attract wider support for their extremist policies, Professor Noam Chomsky warned at the festival’s annual Amnesty International lecture at Queen’s University last night.
The international commentator warned that in the US right-wing voices are trying to tap in to grievances and he urged communities around the world to mobilise against poverty and inequality in their society as a safeguard against extremism.
“In the US inequality has soared to unprecedented heights,” he said.
“There is now a mass of people with real grievances who want answers but are not receiving them.
“The far-right is providing answers that are completely crazy: that rich liberals are giving their hard-earned money away to illegal immigrants and the shiftless poor.
“A common reaction in elite educated circles and much of the left is to ridicule the right-wing protesters, but that is a serious error.
“The correct reaction is to examine our own failures. The grievances are quite real and should be taken seriously.”
He said history showed that it would be a mistake to fail to answer those calls.
“If the protesters are getting crazy answers from the hard-line right-wing extreme, the proper reaction is to provide the right answers and do something about them.
“An organised public can achieve a great deal, as we see right now in many places.
“In South America there are at last serious steps to confront poverty and other severe human rights abuses. The driving force is mass popular movements.
“They are beginning to address what Amnesty calls ‘the unheard truth’: that ‘poverty is the world’s worst human rights crisis, this generation’s greatest struggle’.”
Amnesty International’s Patrick Corrigan said Noam Chomsky’s message is as relevant for people in Belfast as it is for those in Beirut, Baghdad or Beijing.
“We all have a responsibility to stand up for justice and to stand against those who would take away the human rights of the most vulnerable,” said the Amnesty spokesman.
“By standing together, through organisations like Amnesty International, ordinary people can make a call for justice which will be heard in all the world’s capitals.”
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.














Chomsky has never said that enormous massacres did not go on in Cambodia under the Khymer Rouge and Yugoslavia under the Serbian nationists.
He has criticized particular numbers and claims in both cases.
I don't agree with many of his criticisms, but that doesn't mean he's denying holocousts took place.
As a point of fact, neither Cambodia nor Bosnia were genocides since the perpetrators of these holocousts were of the same race as the victims.
No, I don't mean White in the Yugoslavian case.
Croatians, Serbs, and Bosnians are all Serbo-croatian (a variety of Southern Slav) and speak the same language.
The only difference among the 3 is religion, nothing more.
Posted by Raymond | 24.12.09, 01:42 GMT
It is a pity that the article fails to mention Chomsky's recorded position as a genocide denier in relation to Pol Pot's genocide campaign in Cambodia, and the genocides in Rwanda and Srebrenica/Bosnia. It is a pity that Amnesty gave him a platform and that Chomsky didn't use it to apologise to the hundreds of thousands of families whose suffering he denies.
Posted by Peter | 05.11.09, 10:03 GMT