belfasttelegraph

Sunday 19 May 2013

Jackson siblings 'to gain nothing financially'

Janet Jackson

Janet, Randy and Rebbie Jackson are intent on proving that Michael Jackson's "will is invalid."

The trio are going after the executors of their late brother's estate. They believe Michael's bequest is being managed against his final wishes.

The siblings claims that there is "irrefutable evidence" that the signature on the will in questions is bogus, as Michael was in New York on the date that the document was signed in California.

Despite public furore, Janet, Randy and Rebbie will continue to fight to see that their voices are heard in this matter.

"[They] stand to gain nothing financially by a finding that the will is invalid," the threesome's lawyer released in a press release to ET Online.

Apparently they are most concerned about Michael's three children - Prince, Paris and Blanket.

Janet, Randy and Rebbie are aiming to ensure that the King of Pop's wealth goes to his kids, as he desired.

"[They want to replace the executors of the estate and settle matters] in a manner that is in the best interests of the children," the statement read.

Elderly matriarch Katherine lost custody of Paris, Prince and Blanket recently after they were unable to reach her for over nine days.

On Thursday Katherine's guardianship was reinstated, but she will share custody with TJ Jackson.

Janet, Randy and Rebbie have reportedly now been banned from entering the Calabasas home where the kids live with Katherine for vocalising their sentiments on Michael's will.

© Cover Media

Latest Entertainment News

Latest Music News

Latest Film & TV News

Latest Eating Out News

Horoscopes

Your Horoscopes by Russell Grant

Taurus:

No matter how stringently your loved ones warn you, that won't stop you pursuing a romantic interest. You're utterly captivated by someone who exudes warmth, charisma and drama. The two of you get along very well, but beware of the financial toll this relationship will take. The object of your affection likes expensive things. If you're not able to provide them with the luxuries they crave, there will be problems. Then again, you have the potential for being a good provider, so all may be well.More