The day Jodie came out (and became the accused)
It seemed Hollywood was coming to terms with homosexuality. The reaction to Jodie Foster's tribute to her partner suggests otherwise. By Andrew Gumbel
Thursday, 13 December 2007
It's hardly a secret in Hollywood that Jodie Foster is gay. Everybody with an interest in her private life has known it for at least as long as she has been an Oscar-winning actress, which is pushing 20 years by now. (She won an Academy Award for her role as a rape victim in 1988's The Accused, and again three years later for her indelible performance as Clarice Starling in Silence of the Lambs.)
An equally open secret is that she is one of the Hollywood few who is
actually in a stable long-term relationship. She and her partner Cydney
Bernard have been together since 1993, and they are bringing up two children
conceived and delivered by Foster - Charles, who is nine, and Kit (6).
Foster herself, though, has always been hugely reluctant to talk about any of
this. More than most, she is fiercely protective of her privacy - not
entirely surprising, given she entered the goldfish-bowl world of a child
star and became prey to one stalker after another, including John Hinckley,
the man who shot Ronald Reagan.
Occasionally she has alluded in
interviews to one titbit or another about her children, but she has - until
now - made absolutely no public reference to her partner or to her sexual
orientation. That changed, in the tiniest of ways, last week when Foster,
now 45 and as much of a film producer and director as she is an actress,
received a special award at a breakfast thrown by a group called Women In
Entertainment.
Towards the end of her remarks, according to the
lone reporter in the room (an entertainment beat reporter for the Los
Angeles Daily News), she thanked her nearest and dearest, including "my
beautiful Cydney who sticks with me through all the rotten (sic) and the
bliss".
What was striking was not the acknowledgement itself.
(Websites that breathlessly proclaimed Foster had 'come out' were surely
overstating their case.) Rather, it was the sadness of everything that had
gone before and the peculiar agony of being anything other than a straight
up-and-down heterosexual in a town as supposedly progressive and
forward-thinking as Los Angeles.
Here was one of the world's most
successful women, with an enviable and growing body of work to brag about,
and she couldn't - except in the most roundabout way and after 14 years -
feel comfortable acknowledging her life partner in public.
Imagine
Gordon Brown never being able to acknowledge Sarah, or the Queen being
unable to talk about "my husband and I".
In her speech,
Foster talked about her insecurities more generally. "I feel fragile
... unsure, struggling to figure it all out, trying to get there even though
I'm not sure where there is," she said. "I've been working in this
business for 42 years and there's no way you can do that and not be as nutty
as a fruitcake."
People in Hollywood are, famously, only
as big as their last film, and the knives are perpetually out to have the
mighty fall and the talented go astray - but it is doubly, triply, quadruply
difficult for a woman over 40 whose sexuality is, at least surreptitiously,
seen as a strike against her and whose best work is often seen as being
quite some distance in the past.
Given the media reaction to
Foster's single, innocuous acknowledgement of her partner, it's not hard to
understand why she has been so reticent up to now. It's been the grist of
gossip columns and news articles across the globe, a clear invasion of the
very privacy she works so hard to maintain. Gay advocates have encouraged
her to be more open still and come all the way out of the closet; more
homophobic writers have taken a more sneering tone, using the mini-episode
as an excuse to pour more of their favourite invective on the den of
iniquity that they believe Hollywood to be.
Foster is lucky, in the
sense that her sexual orientation is already well-known and is unlikely to
dent her chances of landing a big part or sewing up a movie deal. Most
actors don't even dare talk about it.
"It's a death sentence
for your career," Eve Gordon, a (heterosexual) film and TV actress told
me last year. "All my friends who are gay keep it secret. They don't
even know where to draw the line socially ... It's like being a communist in
the McCarthy era. It's a gigantic terror."
Inch by inch, that
terror may be receding. At least, its limits are being tested as never
before, in the wake of two highly unusual public declarations of
homosexuality by reasonably prominent actors. One, TR Knight, works on the
hit hospital drama Grey's Anatomy. The other is Neil Patrick Harris.
The implications for the future careers of Knight and Harris remain to be
seen.
One thing, though, seems sure and has been true of Foster
for years: that while it's considered ok for unambiguously straight
performers to play gay parts (think of Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger in
Brokeback Mountain or, going much further back, Tom Hanks in Philadelphia),
it's almost unheard of for gay or suspected gay actors to do the same thing.
Likewise, the biggest fear gay actors have is that, once their sexuality
becomes public knowledge, they won't get the straight parts any more either
- certainly not the romantic lead-type roles, because the studios will be
afraid they will no longer convince audiences that they can possibly be
attracted to their co-stars of the opposite sex.
This is
neanderthal thinking, of course - don't actors make a living pretending to
be something they are not all the time? Foster herself has made a brilliant
career of delving into the darker recesses of her characters' (unvaryingly
straight) sexuality, never more so than in The Accused when her Sarah Tobias
had to fend off the suspicions of the legal system that she had 'asked' to
be gang-raped by dressing provocatively and flirting with her attackers.
In the past few years, Foster hasn't been called upon to play those sorts of
parts - a function of another Hollywood prejudice, this time against women
too old to play romantic leads and too young to play grandmothers. In her
past few performances (Flight Plan, The Brave One, Inside Man) she's
essentially been a cog in the wheel of thriller-type plots that didn't
require unusual amounts of soul-baring.
Her producing and directing
interests have tended to explore other topics, too. Her first film as
director, Little Man Tate, looked at the issue of precociously brilliant
children (something she was herself, at least to some degree).
Her
latest project is a biopic of Leni Riefenstahl, the technically brilliant
film propagandist for the Nazis. Foster landed her first job when she was
three - a Coppertone suncream commercial - and never looked back. Her father
had walked out on the family a few months before she was born, leaving her
mother, a film producer, to fend for herself. Jodie went on to become the
most successful child star of her generation, appearing in 50 films before
she finished school - everything from Disney family fare to her most
notorious early role as a child prostitute in Martin Scorsese's classic Taxi
Driver.
It was after this film that would-be assassin Hinckley told
the world he had shot Reagan out of love for Foster. The shooting in 1981
shattered whatever was left of Foster's privacy and she was followed
everywhere on the campus of Yale University, where she was studying by a
media pack. She was called to testify at Hinckley's trial and when she told
the court she had no relationship with the accused, Hinckley threw a pen at
her and yelled: "I'll get you, Foster!" That prompted another
stalker to follow her around Yale. These were not events designed to make
Foster feel comfortable about going public with anything. To her credit, she
has a life, and has made it a brilliant success. If she tells us to back
off, she has her reasons.
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.
