Choice and value for the local air traveller has never been better
Toxic fumes on planes ‘threaten thousands of passengers each year’
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
By Geoffrey Lean
Two official investigations are being opened into alarming leaks of poison
into commercial airliners in flight. They follow scientific research showing
that fumes have rendered pilots incapable of flying their aircraft safely
and have put hundreds of thousands of British passengers at risk.
The House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology is about to
examine the threat as part of an investigation into air travel and health.
And the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) said that the Government is to fit
equipment in at least one plane in the hope of studying a leak when it takes
place.
A new pressure group, the Aerotoxic Association, will be launched to
campaign on the issue – and will start by publishing the Aviation
Contaminated Air Reference Manual, which includes details of more than 1,050
incidents in Britain alone.
Air travel has been made possible over the past 60 years by a technique
called “bleed air pressurisation”, which takes hot air out of the engine,
cools it down and then feeds it – without first filtering it – into the
plane’s cabin and cockpit.
Sometimes, however, this becomes contaminated with engine oils containing
many different chemicals, which are wafted into the plane to be inhaled by
passengers and crew alike. Campaigners are particularly concerned about a
neurotoxin called tricresyl phosphate (TCP).
No one knows how frequently an event of this kind takes place because no
commercial airliners are fitted with monitors to detect it. But Professor
Chris van Netten, an expert on the problem at the University of British
Columbia, said he found TCP in every aircraft he examined.
A survey by the British Airline Pilots Association found that less than 4
per cent of contaminated air incidents experienced by its members were
reported to the CAA. Sarah Mackenzie Ross, a consultant clinical
neuropsychologist and chartered clinical psychologist at University College
London, estimated in a recently published paper that on that basis 197,000
passengers on nearly 2,000 UK flights were exposed in 2004 alone.
She has also examined 27 affected pilots for another official investigation
being conducted by the Committee on Toxicity, which advises government
departments.
She found that all but one of the pilots suffered “chronic health problems,
including fatigue, sleep difficulties, fluctuating gastrointestinal
problems, numbness and tingling in fingers and toes, memory loss and
word-finding difficulties”.
Some, she added, reported “alarming cognitive failures”, including: “being
unable to retain, or confusing, numerical data and information provided by
air traffic control regarding altitude and speed; completing tasks in the
incorrect sequence; setting the wrong cleared level for the aircraft to
climb or descend; and being unable to recall important matters such as
whether the undercarriage has been raised or lowered.”
Some have had to stop flying altogether, including Tristan Loraine, who is
publishing a novel based on his experiences next week. A superfit pilot with
20 years’ experience, he competed in the Ironman Triathlon in August 2005,
but had become so ill within a year that he was grounded.
He says the fumes made him feel as if “I had been hit across the head with a
baseball bat”; even a trip to Paris as a passenger last Wednesday made him
ill again.
“This shows how quickly your life can be turned round, what the exposure can
do to you even if you are really fit,” he says.
The CAA says that leaks are decreasing, and that the onboard test – to be
run by the Department of Transport – will start “very shortly”. But
campaigners are sceptical of both official inquiries and aim to step up the
pressure on ministers.