Catholic school bans cervical cancer jabs

Thursday, 25 September 2008

A Catholic school is to refuse to allow girls to have the HPV cervical cancer injections on its premises.

Governors of St Monica's High, in Prestwich, Bury, who in the past have said the jabs encourage sexual promiscuity, say the decision was made on health grounds. The injections are backed by the national Catholic Education Service.

Governor and parish priest Monsignor John Allen last night defended the school's decision.

"This is not a moral judgment on the vaccination", he said.

"It's a question of where this vaccination should be given and how it should be given."

Governors wrote to the parents of Year 8 girls, aged 12 to 13, informing them of their decision.

The letter states that during a pilot study of the vaccine at a local clinic "a number of our girls were either absent from school the day following their vaccination or had to be sent home from school suffering from dizziness, nausea, joint pain, headaches or high temperature."

The governors state they believe that parents "will want to conduct their own research into this vaccination" and accompany their daughter to each of the three appointments to "offer support and assistance should she suffer any side effects".

The letter states: "We do not believe that school is the right place for the three injections to be administered. Therefore, Governors have taken the decision not to allow the school premises to be used for this programme."

It also states the school will release family details to the local primary care trust so they can inform parents about the vaccination programme.

The letter informs parents that the Catholic Education Service has no objections to the programme, but does not address the question of whether the vaccination should be offered in school.

Msgr Allen said: "This matter is primarily a public health issue, not a school issue. That's the reason we came to the decision as governors.

"We're saying it's such an important issue that parents should make that decision in consultation with their family doctor. The school is not to be used for this."

Fr Michael Walsh, spokesman for the Salford Diocese, said: "There is no moral objection to this. The decision whether to allow it in school is the decision of the governing body."

Headteacher Frank McCarron said: "I can't comment on governors' decisions."

A spokesperson for Bury Council said: "Bury Council is aware of the issue regarding St Monica's High School and their concerns about allowing students to be vaccinated with the HPV Vaccine.

"The council views this decision a school matter as each school has the right to make individual decisions regarding issues such as this".

Schools Secretary Ed Balls told BBC Radio 4's World At One: "The Catholic education service said there is nothing in Catholic teaching that says this is wrong.

"This will help hundreds of children whose lives will be saved because of these vaccinations.

"I'm not going to comment on this individual decision of a governing body, I've not looked at it in detail. But in general, the vast majority of schools will be delivering these vaccinations and they will do so to save lives.

"I think schools should be at the centre of their community and I don't think schools walking away from their responsibilities to children's health is the right way to go."

The national vaccination programme protects against two strains of the human papilloma virus which are responsible for 70% of cervical cancers.

The vaccination programme is due to start this month and is being offered to girls aged 12 to 13 each year.

hi im 12 i go to sir jonathan north community college and on 2 days ago on wednesday i had the jab it hurt quite a bit but id rather have a short period of pain dizziness headache ect than cervical cancer and stds it is worth it one day it could save my life and when im older my girls will 100% be having that jab

Posted by aimee | 10.10.08, 14:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

This does not directly involve the consent to HPV vaccination. It boils down to the Church introducing additional expense to the NHS by refusing to permit their schools to be used. Side effects of the decision raise concern about public money spent to support faith based schools and the implication that the Church does not approve of the HPV vaccine for Catholics. Msgr Allen and the Governors decision as it relates to safety or efficacy is ignorant. Trustees in education should refrain from the evaluation of medical clinical trials.

Posted by s.elliott | 27.09.08, 09:55 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

This is moronic..... So many of my family have died of cancer and people will willingly reject a vaccine?!?!?! Idiots. When your daughter dies before you you'll know all about it.

Posted by Anon | 26.09.08, 14:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Is issue has nothing to do with public health, pharmaceutical companies making millions or morals.

The issue here is about monolithic, undemocratic organisation banning a genuine public health drive because it going against their archaic dogma's. These other reasons are just excuses or smokescreens and anyone who honestly believes them has been brainwashed. Never let religion interfere with education!!

Posted by Dave | 26.09.08, 13:34 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

What is worse? A little baby or cervical cancer? Get real. Its not the end of the world

Posted by Siobhan | 26.09.08, 11:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

This is a slightly confusing issue because there is an assumption inherent that HPV is contracted as a result of promiscuity: it may not be the case at all. The only woman I know of who has it contracted it from her ex husband. I understand that she has had few, if any, other sexual partners. As a result we would be doing a gross disservice to young women who may be very sexually faithful later in life, to deny them this jab.

Posted by Laura | 25.09.08, 19:24 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

I tend to agree at the moment, if i had a daughter i would have serious doubts about giving her this vaccine, its only out and no known side affects have been documented etc.

Does this vaccine even cover all the reasons why a girl would get cervical cancer, i doubt it very much!!

Parents do abit of research before you take the step to get your children injected with a new medicine.

Posted by louise | 25.09.08, 17:34 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Good move. Parents should read, read, read and read some more before taking a decision.

It's your child's health and the pharmaceutical companies earning £240 per head will obviously deny any harm from these injections as they stand to make millions.

I know of one case of a nurse going ape on a parent who wouldn't allow their child the MMR vaccine. The nurse went nuts, so the parent asked the nurse what was in the vaccine - the nurse, rather unsurprisingly, couldn't answer. Yet the nurse was willing to inject the child without ANY understanding of what she was doing.

People are brainwashed into doing what they are told without understanding the consequences especially with TV ads.

And well done that school!

Posted by Liam | 25.09.08, 15:28 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Most viewed in Education

BT Woman.

Just Born: Readers' Baby Pictures

Just Born: Readers' Baby Pictures

To send Us Your Baby snaps just Click here

Just Wed: Readers' Wedding Pictures

Just Born: Readers' Wedding Pictures

To send Us Your Wedding snaps just Click here

Latest Comments

Belfast Telegraph Home Delivery