DUP leader opposed publicly funded visitor centre in 2005
Paisley attack came more than two years before latest row on scheme
Tuesday, 18 September 2007
DUP leader Ian Paisley derided a Government plan for a Giant's Causeway centre two and a half years before his Ministers floored the scheme, the Belfast Telegraph has learned.
The North Antrim MP's statement in early 2005 also said the private sector
should take the lead on a new Causeway visitor centre.
The First
Minister's party was plunged into controversy last week when two of his
Stormont Ministers handed a massive boost to proposals for a
privately-developed Causeway centre.
The businessman behind this
controversial scheme, Seymour Sweeney, is a DUP member.
DUP
Environment Minister Arlene Foster announced last week that she was minded
to grant Mr Sweeney planning approval. She strongly denied having had any
knowledge of his party affiliation and threatened to sue anyone who impugned
her integrity.
Her party colleague, Enterprise Minister Nigel
Dodds, meanwhile, halted his Department's plans for a publicly-funded centre.
Mr Dodds told the Assembly that the Government scheme, involving the Tourist
Board, National Trust and Moyle Council, had been hit by "delay, delay
and delay".
He also rejected suggestions that a planning
application for a publicly-funded centre had been imminent, adding: "If
only that were the case."
Mr Dodds' regret on the lack of
progress may not be entirely shared at the top of his party.
For
DUP leader Ian Paisley issued a strongly-worded press release in February
2005 dismissing the Government-led plans for a centre as "fool's gold"
.
The statement came after Moyle Council had backed the public sector
scheme, which was being developed under direct rule ministers.
The
release was co-signed by his MLA son Ian Paisley Jnr and fellow DUP North
Antrim Assemblyman Mervyn Storey.
Heavily critical of Moyle's
decision, the joint press statement was entitled: "Only fool's gold at
end of Causeway rainbow."
It said: "The need for a state
of the art visitor centre at the Giant's Causeway couldn't be more
compelling. However, we believe that the current strategy to achieve that
goal is flawed.
"Government and its agencies in the Tourist
Board are not best placed to deliver tourism facilities. In fact, there is
much to prove the case that government run resorts usually end in closures
because they are not expert driven.
"It is essential that any
development of tourism facilities has with it the expertise of the private
sector who know what they are doing and have experience marketing and
running state of the art tourist facilities."
The statement
also said: "We have grave reservations that what is being proposed will
now fall well short of what is required to meet the current and projected
future needs of Northern Ireland's premier tourist destination.
"
The much promised rainbow over the Giant's Causeway will at this rate lead
only to fools gold."
Mr Paisley Jnr has been an enthusiastic
supporter of Mr Sweeney's private sector visitor centre plans for many years.
He also backed the developer's development of the Nook pub close to the
Causeway and his successful legal challenge against the Northern Area Plan,
a DoE development framework for the north coast.
Last week, when
asked on Radio Ulster's Nolan show if he knew Mr Sweeney, Mr Paisley Jnr
said: "He happens to be a constituent."
And when asked if
he supported the developer, he replied: "I know of him, yes."
Mr Sweeney's membership of the DUP was confirmed shortly afterwards. The
businessman stated that he had never given any financial donations to the
party.
He also confirmed that he had sold Mr Paisley Jnr a house
near Bushmills in 2004 and emphasised that this sale had been at full market
value.
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.






