Does Northern Ireland need a Bill of Rights?

By Claire McNeilly
Friday, 12 March 2010

Does Northern Ireland need a Bill of Rights? And if so, how far should its provisions go beyond ensuring our fundamental civil and political liberties?

Human rights activists believe the more rights that are enshrined in law the happier the population will be — but it really does depend on who you ask.

For instance, nationalist political parties tend to voice their support for the expanded model, while unionists are more cautiously inclined towards a mere acceptance of the basic premise.

Secretary of State Shaun Woodward has already rejected the social and economic rights recommended by the Human Rights Commission for inclusion in the Bill.

So, as it currently stands, the public consultation document contains just two enforceable rights — the right to vote and be elected, and the right to identify as British, Irish or both.

Meanwhile, the results of a recent poll by the Human Rights Consortium, published in the Belfast Telegraph today, indicate strong public support for the inclusion of additional social and economic rights in current Government proposals.

Support for the right to vote or be elected was deemed either “important” or “very important” by 97% of those polled, while 86% supported the right to be identified as British, Irish or both.

The findings also show that a minority of people, some 40%, felt that having just the two rights were sufficient, while 44% argued they were not.

When polled on socio-economic rights, however — such as the right to adequate accommodation or an adequate standard of living — up to 95% of respondents felt that this was very important.

In summary, 83% of people felt that there should be more than just the two rights recommended by Government included in the Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland.

Human Rights Consortium campaigns manager Kevin Hanratty said the results of the poll, undertaken by Millward Brown Ulster, were “strikingly clear”.

“The latest figures show huge public support for a Bill of Rights, which contains meaningful rights on those everyday issues that matter here such as healthcare, housing and jobs,” he said. “These results should send a powerful message to the the Secretary of State as he decides the next step in for a Bill of Rights in Northern Ireland.

“The majority of people here want a strong and meaningful Bill of Rights that protects bread and butter issues — and it’s time to deliver.”

It has been a rocky road for the Bill — which entrenches civil and political rights — since its conception back in 1998.

Not to be confused with the Human Rights Act, this legislation would apply to citizens of Northern Ireland only, and not the rest of the UK.

The deadline for submissions to the public consultation process is at the end of this month, after which the Government would aim to produce draft legislation destined for Westminster.

A more pessimistic view, though, is that a Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland — which was part of the Good Friday Agreement's wishlist — may not be introduced for several more years – if ever.

With Mr Woodward effectively pouring cold water on the proposals from the Human Rights Commission, as well as the potential for a change of Government come May, this Bill seems as far away as ever from becoming reality.

Some experts believe it could get lost in the dissolution of one parliament and the recovening of another.

A real stumbling block to further progress is that our politicians differ greatly as to what they see as the “particular circumstances of Northern Ireland”, the phrase in the Good Friday Agreement.

And, in any case, the Government is unlikely to push a bill through the Commons division lobbies without cross-party support here.

Brice Dickson, a law professor at Queen’s University in Belfast and a former NIHRC chief commissioner, is in favour of a Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland, provided it has cross-party support in the Assembly and doesn’t give excessive powers to unelected judges.

Professor Dickson added: “Reforms that cannot be agreed through a Bill of Rights can instead be campaigned for through ordinary legislation, as in the past with anti-discrimination laws and the Freedom of Information Act.”

The consultation paper is available on the Northern Ireland Office website. Responses should be sent by March 31

I agree but I whould say the U.K. as well advice all to read the American bill of rights for it works for all.

Posted by phl | 12.03.10, 23:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

All's we ever hear about is people demanding their rights but few ever mention their responsibilities.

Posted by T J McClean | 12.03.10, 19:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

BoldRobertEmmet is correct. This is less a "bill of rights" and more a "bill of entitlements". It is only when we become used to things which not too long ago were considered luxuries, that over time we start to regard such luxuries as "entitlements". Everything the state gives to one person, has first to be taken from another. It is absolutely vital that people actually read all of the proposals in the draft bill of rights. Everything has to be paid for and if you work, it will be coming out of your pocket. If the state fails to provide any of these rights, the penalty will also have to come out of your pocket.

Posted by OldSod | 12.03.10, 15:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

This poll by the Human Rights Consortium is the kind of poll which asks a question which seeks the answer which is most congenial to the questioner! There is NO massive demand for an all-but-the-kitchen-sink Bill of Rights, as the HRC would have us believe. And who paid for this poll ? Hundreds of thousands of pounds have been given to the HRC by US-based Atlantic Philanthropies for their campaign. There is an anti-state agenda here. There is no such massive funding for those who don't share HRC's views. It is an utterly skewed political playing field, thanks to the flooding with foreign funding of NI's small political space. And Monica McWilliams's predecessor, Prof. Brice Dickson has since come out against a broad NI Bill of Rights. The HRC has nothing to say about RESPONSIBILITIES of citizens, only their "rights." And it has little interest in victims. The HRC campaign is politics-by-funding and damages the democratic space in NI.

Posted by BoldRobertEmmet | 12.03.10, 14:13 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

The current draft for the bill of rights is a free for all. A great many of the rights are already guaranteed by the human rights act and statute law, which is fine if somewhat redundant. The rest is pure pie in the sky, essentially promising everything for nothing. I believe the state is being obliged to cater for too much, taking over too many obligations. I prefer Benjamin Franklin's attitude to rights: "The Constitution only guarantees the American people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."

Posted by Oldsod | 12.03.10, 09:18 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

NiteLife: White's Tavern

Had a big night out? Click here to send your pics

In Pictures: Lingerie Super Bowl 2012

In Pictures: Lingerie Super Bowl 2012

Women: Can you flaunt too much?

Women: Can you flaunt too much?

Old School Pictures: Ian Paisley

Old School Pics: Girls Aloud Nadine Coyle

To launch gallery click image or select school below

Methodist College, Campbell College, Grosvenor,
Bangor Grammar, Dunlambert, St Augustine's,
St Dominic's, Royal Academy, Ballymena Academy

Teletoons by Stevie Lee

Teletoons by Stevie Lee

Follow us on Twitter

In Pictures: The Troubles

Titanic Gallery: First class bedroom

Titanic Gallery: exclusive collection

Out & About: Pizza Night

Out & About: Pizza Night

Columnist Comments

gail_walker

Gritty, moving and heroic...Billy plays captured life here

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times ... Sunday's 30th anniversary screening of the seminal Too Late to Talk to Billy was riveting viewing. But it wasn't nostalgic viewing.
ed_curran

Parties need better defence in Stormont's game of two halves

Surprise, surprise. Peter Robinson has been to his first gaelic match, Martin McGuinness is heading for Windsor Park and the Ulster Unionists have scored another own goal.
nuala_mckeever

Why trying to go on a diet is never really a piece of cake

Some people make New Year’s resolutions, I make lists. Every new year I determine to keep track of everything I spend and everything I eat and drink.

frances_burscough

Scary movie? Their jaws were sore from laughing

Teenage boys love horror films and I have two who are in charge of the remote control in our house, so naturally there’s gore-a-plenty on the box most weekends. However, until recently one film was banned.

Just Born: Readers' Baby Pictures

Just Born: Readers' Baby Pictures

To send Us Your Baby snaps just Click here

Just Wed: Readers' Wedding Pictures

Just Born: Readers' Wedding Pictures

To send Us Your Wedding snaps just Click here

Latest Comments

Belfast Telegraph Home Delivery