Marching proudly... wounded soldier denied entry to a pub
Monday, 21 September 2009
A Northern Ireland soldier who was badly burned in an explosion in Afghanistan has proudly joined his comrades for a special parade through Coleraine.
Michael Stoker was one of 70 members of the Queen's Royal Hussars who took part in the parade through the centre of the town yesterday.
Mr Stoker, who is the son of the former Belfast Lord Mayor Bob Stoker, suffered a broken pelvis and 30% burns after the vehicle he was in hit a mine and overturned at the end of May.
Just minutes before the explosion Michael had changed places in the vehicle with a colleague who died.
One spectator said he had appeared emotional during the parade, which was hosted by Coleraine Borough Council.
“He got a bit emotional because there was a wreath-laying ceremony for all those killed,” he said.
Following the wreath-laying ceremony the parade ended |with a service at the New Row Presbyterian church in the town.
Meanwhile Mr Stoker's father has said he is pleased that his son has not been barred from a Belfast pub following a newspaper report that he was turned away from its doors earlier this summer.
But Bob Stoker insisted that his son should not have been denied entry to Lavery's for wearing tracksuit bottoms over his injured legs.
Michael had been visiting his home town in July for medical treatment and met up with friends at the popular city centre bar in Belfast.
“They met up, had a drink and went out for something to eat. When they came back to Lavery's the door staff were on the door and stopped them,” said Mr Stoker, who served as Lord Mayor of the city in 1999. “I think a couple of the other lads had taken drink. When they went to go in they were told you can't come in with track bottoms on.
“One of the other lads said that the reason Michael was wearing track bottoms was that he was blown up and has to wear loose clothing because of his injuries.”
Mr Stoker said he had been told that one of the doormen said: “‘I don't care if he was blown up across the street — he's not getting in dressed like that’.”
However, a spokesman from the popular bar said that the reason the group had been denied entry was because the others appeared to be intoxicated.
“There is no mention of him being barred,” he said.
“They were refused entry on the night because they had too much alcohol. We can't allow people in if they are intoxicated.”
He added the bar had received numerous complaints and threats since the story was publicised in a Sunday newspaper yesterday.
“All day we have had to take the phone off the hook because of the abuse the staff have had to take,” he said.
- Text Size

Photosales
niJobfinder
niCarfinder
Home Delivery
Propertynews














Don't set rules aside for any soldiers, but use common sense for any disabled person. I was not there so I cannot judge either side.
Our society should not give 'homage' to the military, that was for the British and Roman Empires.
Posted by J T WALSH | 22.09.09, 03:31 GMT
If there are rules then apply them evenly. Other loose clothing could be worn.
Posted by robbo | 21.09.09, 21:39 GMT
The headline implies that he was refused entry because he is a British soldier, when in fact it is clear that the man did not comply with Lavery's dress code. It has nothing to do with him being a soldier, and the bouncers wouldn't have made a distinction.
Very misleading!
Posted by Ciaran Gallagher | 21.09.09, 18:20 GMT
di,
I totally agree that burns victims warrant exception.
But my point (half cut out by the BT moderators??????) was that these fellas didn't get in because they were too drunk. Nothing to do with burns or soldiers.
But to read the BT's headline you would think it was some great slight against the british army.
Posted by gearoid | 21.09.09, 16:38 GMT
no the rules shouldn't be set aside for british soldiers, but it should be set aside for people with burns and needs to wear loose clothing that cant wear jeans trousers etc
Posted by di | 21.09.09, 16:15 GMT
Yes gearoid, under the circumstances, the rules should have been broken. This was afterall an injured man, irrespective of his vocation. It wouldnt have hurt the bouncers to show some compassion. God Bless all our brave soldiers!!
Posted by Roy | 21.09.09, 15:21 GMT
Geroid, obviously you've never read the Disability Discrimination legislation where there is an onus to make reasonable adjustments for the disabled. Perhaps Michael should discuss this with Equality NI? Would you, Geroid, have the same attitude if it was a fireman or are you just inflexible?
Posted by Bemused | 21.09.09, 14:48 GMT
yet again the BT serves its own agenda - rather than any real news.
Should the rules be set aside for british soldiers??
Posted by gearoid | 21.09.09, 11:53 GMT