Nurse who refused to remove crucifix fails in bias claim
Wednesday, 7 April 2010
A nurse who was moved to a desk job after refusing to remove her crucifix has lost a claim for discrimination.
Shirley Chaplin (54) took the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust Hospital to an employment tribunal, claiming that taking off a necklace bearing a crucifix would “violate her faith”.
The trust said the move was not specifically about the crucifix, but about health and safety concerns about patients grabbing necklaces.
Yesterday employment tribunal panel chairman John Hollow found against Mrs Chaplin, who had worn the emblem throughout her 30 years as a nurse.
Mr Hollow ruled the trust had acted in a “reasonable” manner in trying to reach a compromise.
He said the damage to her was “slight” and noted that wearing a crucifix was not a requirment of the Christian faith. After the hearing Mrs Chaplin said the result was “a bad day for Christianity.”
She vowed not to remove the crucifix, explaining: “I wouldn't have gone this far if I was prepared to take it off.
“I was always prepared to modify the chain with a magnetic clasp (meaning that it would separate more easily if grabbed by a patient).”
Her lawyer Paul Diamond said the case would now go to employment appeal tribunal in London.
In a 71-point statement, Mrs Chaplin, who wore the crucifix to the hearing in her home city of Exeter, had said she was “personally convicted” to wear the emblem, given to her as a confirmation gift in 1971.
She said: “I have been a nurse for roughly 30 years and throughout that time I have worn my crucifix.
“The crucifix is an exceptionally important expression of my faith and my belief in the Lord Jesus Christ.
“To deliberately remove or hide my crucifix or to treat it disrespectfully would violate my faith.”
She started working for the trust continuously in 1989, being made a grade D nurse in 1994, and promoted to an E grade nurse on 2001. Wearing the old uniform, the cross was visible and she wore it safely for 30 years, Mrs Chaplin said.
When a new-style uniform was introduced, there were still no issues until she was asked to remove the necklace last summer
It was suggested she pin the crucifix inside her uniform but Mrs Chaplin could not accept that.
In September a request to keep the cross pinned outside her uniform was turned down, she said.
Last July, she was told she was facing a “disciplinary sanction”. In August she was threatened with formal disciplinary action.
She said she received a letter in September telling her the cross was not a “mandatory requirement” of her faith, unlike Muslim headscarves, which “therefore could be exempted”.
Later that month she accepted formal re-deployment from frontline duties.
- Text Size

Photosales
niJobfinder
niCarfinder
Home Delivery
Propertynews
















Laws on religion must apply to all religions the same. Bussiness rules must not violate the law. If a citzen does not like a law, then work to get it changed but it is the law until it is changed.
Posted by phl | 08.04.10, 15:16 GMT
what would really be the problem with wearing it under her uniform if it was personal to her. Why should peoples superstitions mean that different rules should apply to them? It might be my belief that the world was created by a giant turtle so I want to carry a turtle arround with me while I work and if anyone objects they are denying my religious freedom. Thankfully the employment tribunal had a bit of sence
Posted by Ian | 07.04.10, 13:59 GMT