Safety warning over new-generation of nuclear reactors
Friday, 27 November 2009
The progress of the Government's nuclear power expansion plans was dealt a blow today after experts raised a raft of safety concerns about two proposed reactors.
Health and safety experts said they had identified a "significant" number of issues over the designs of the French and American reactors set to power a new generation of UK plants in the next decade.
In reports out today on the assessment of the French EPR and US AP1000 designs, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) said there was a much more "detailed work" to do before they could be approved for use.
The HSE said of both units: "We have identified a significant number of issues with the safety features of ...that would first have to be progressed.
"If these are not progressed satisfactorily then we would not issue a design acceptance confirmation."
Among the criticisms raised, experts said there were significant concerns about EPR's proposed architecture, and that improvements were required for "hazard barriers".
Other issues relating to the reactor's structural integrity were also addressed, with the report saying it was "too early to say whether they could be resolved solely with additional safety case changes or whether they may result in design modifications being necessary".
The safety case of the AP1000's internal hazards also showed "significant shortfalls", it was found.
The HSE's assessment work is due to be completed within a year and a half, but one industry expert suggested a delay of up to three years was possible.
Kevin Allars, a nuclear assessment director at the HSE, highlighted shortages of information about the new reactors from their manufacturers.
He said: "Despite some initial resource shortages in some technical areas, we have made good progress on our assessment and we have identified issues that require further work."
"We are now at the stage of discussing these issues with the design companies, who are putting in place plans to resolve them.
"If we are to complete (design assessment) by the target date of June 2011, we will need the design companies to work with us proactively and to provide the high quality and timely information we need."
Ministers have announced plans for 10 new nuclear power stations to help offset the country's carbon emissions.
The first is set to be operational by 2018 and, by 2025, nuclear electricity generation could amount to around 40% of new energy provision.
The announcements were coupled with moves aimed at speeding up planning decisions on new energy projects aimed at cutting decisions to one year.
John Large, a leading nuclear consultant, aired the possibility of the HSE delaying the designs acceptance by up to three years.
He told The Guardian: "The HSE as an independent agency will come under tremendous pressure to push through these designs.
"But if it stands up to (the) government and stops or delays these designs for two or three years until it is satisfied then developers could lose interest and we could fall behind in the queue of countries waiting to build nuclear."
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.





















If something goes wrong with these reactors in Britain we'll all get wiped out here in Ireland
Posted by Donncha | 27.11.09, 23:37 GMT
Is it not possible for British scientists and civil engineers to design and build our own nuclear power stations? Would it not be cheaper in the long run, considering that these 10 generators will be only the start, and would we then not be more expert in the technologies required? Of course a lot of very clever people will be quick to say it can not or should not be done for a host of reasons, but is it not high tme that Britain restored its 19th Century spirit of technological invention and innovation, self-sufficiency and national self-confidence ... as well as, dare I say it, national PRIDE?
Posted by andrew kevin thomson | 27.11.09, 10:40 GMT