U2 hotel revamp gets green light but only if rooftop is open to all
Friday, 18 July 2008
It could have been an exclusive venue where celebs and the glitterati could hob-nob far from the rabble. But any plans rock band U2 might have to party in private in their rooftop bar overlooking Dublin have been dashed.
The Republic's planning board, An Bord Pleanala, has granted planning permission for a controversial redevelopment of the Clarence Hotel on the Dublin quays, but included an unusual condition that the public must have access to the fabled 'sky bar' which is an intrinsic part of the plans.
Although the band had not sought to refuse permission to the public, it is the second time in recent months authorities have felt obliged to compel hostelries to open their doors to the public. In May, the High Court ruled that a members-only club on St Stephen's Green could operate a VIP system, but would not be allowed to refuse entry to the general public.
Yesterday's decision means that U2 members Bono and The Edge, along with property developer Paddy McKillen, can begin work on the €150m project to quadruple the size of the building and transform it into a nine-storey, 140-bedroom, five-star hotel, designed by architect Norman Foster.
"We are delighted that An Bord Pleanala has given us the green light for Norman Foster's design for The Clarence," the owners said in a statement yesterday. "It's great news for the team that has worked so hard on this project."
The project includes a huge glass atrium, accessible to the public, at the heart of the hotel, with a 'skycatcher' -- or oval glass roof -- allowing light to enter the building. The basement will be home to a swimming pool called 'Dubh Linn', with the 'sky bar' at the top of the building providing views across the city. No date has been set for construction to begin.
However, the project has caused outrage among conservationists and the Department of the Environment because it involves the virtual destruction of the Clarence Hotel, an art deco building dating from 1937; four Georgian buildings from the early 19th century; and Dollard House, which was built in 1886.
All are listed buildings, and only the facades along Wellington Quay will be preserved.
There were seven objectors, and legal action aimed at overturning the permission is likely.
Yesterday, An Taisce said the board had set a precedent which could see other listed buildings demolished to make way for new developments. This is only supposed to happen in 'exceptional circumstances' -- where a building was dangerous, for example -- and none had been demonstrated, it said.
"The proposal does open up a precedent on the quays," An Taisce heritage officer Ian Lumley said. "This undermines the architectural conservation area, and it could be the subject of legal proceedings. The board are venturing into very dangerous territory."
In overturning its inspector's recommendation to refuse permission, the board said the high quality of the revamped hotel and benefits to the area meant the project would be in accordance with proper planning and granted permission subject to 19 conditions.
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.




































Spend the money on Africa Bono!!!!
And yes I have been to Dublin many times and love it as I love U2...
Posted by Donsi | 22.07.08, 07:20 GMT
I wonder how much of the world debt 150 million euro would pay off.
Posted by Steve | 18.07.08, 23:50 GMT
Good. I've seen the design and it's pretty impressive. Regarding knocking down history; just because soething is old doesn't follow that it has any architectural merrit. That area of Dublin is lined with buildings which date back to the Georgian persiod and they are featureless and dilapidated and need to be raised and something bult in their place. On the other hand I'd be utterly opposed to any destruction of Merrion suare and other such similarly splendid examples of architecture from that period. Whether buildings get built or demolishedshould be judged on the individual merrit of that particular structure.
Posted by Derek | 18.07.08, 16:26 GMT
I was just in Ireland recently visiting my husband's home town and fell in love with Ireland with all it's charm, beauty and architecture which gives Ireland it's uniqueness. It would be a shame to tear down those important historical building to make way for a modern hotel/club. If we keep tearing down history what will be left for our children and future generations except concrete and glass.
Posted by Sandy | 18.07.08, 14:46 GMT
Foster is a good architect but the destruction architectural heritage is usually abhorred by later generations.
Cape Town's Amsterdam-type canals were filled in and most of the urban Cape Dutch buildings destroyed in what would have been a World Heritage site today.
Beijing has also razed acres of hutong houses - supposedly in the interests of commerce but destroying a potential tourist attraction and heritage site in the process.
Posted by John McC | 18.07.08, 11:52 GMT