Ulster scientist warns of plastic baby bottles 'cancer risk'
Monday, 16 March 2009
A University of Ulster scientist has warned that parents should avoid using plastic baby bottles containing a potentially cancer-causing chemical.
The chemical, known as BPA, has recently been banned in Canada because of concerns over the dangers it could pose to infants.
However, the Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) said that a review by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) last summer had concluded that there was no risk to infants from the quantities of BPA that could leach from bottles.
This was because humans including newborns eliminated it quickly from their bodies.
Professor Vyvyan Howard, a toxico-pathologist at the University of Ulster's Biomedical Sciences Research Institute said we should not be exposing infants to possible cancer risks from Bisphenol A (BPA) as toxicological evidence showed foetuses and young babies were most at risk from the hormonal damage it had been shown to cause to animals.
Up to half a million baby bottles are sold each year in Ireland, and most still contain BPA although alternatives are slowly becoming available.
But Prof Howard who is also president of the Society of Doctors for the Environment said that his research, and that of others, showed that BPA had endocrine-disrupting effects at very low doses, although toxicological techniques were not yet sophisticated enough to prove this definitively.
Developing
Only last year the Canadian authorities had listed BPA as a toxic substance and banned the use of polycarbonate plastic baby bottles which contained it, he said.
"Given that the first few months out of the womb are crucial while babies are still developing their brains and reproductive organs, it would be recommended that Irish parents certainly err on the side of caution and seek to purchase BPA-free products for infants and children," he said.
Prof Howard said that for that reason he had "voted with my feet" by choosing to use only glass bottles with his own child, who was now three years old.
His views have been quoted by the company Pharmed which has launched two types of BPA-free bottles on the Irish market, Bibi and Born Free, but Prof Howard stressed that he had "absolutely no financial or any other connection" to them.
He said BPA had a whole raft of effects on the foetus, and research by his colleague Professor Ana Soto at Tufts University showed BPA had effects on breast, prostate and testicular development even at doses much lower than those permitted under current guidelines.
The Canadian authorities concluded that the main source of exposure to BPA for babies was from the use of baby bottles exposed to high temperatures and from cans of infant formula, and though exposure was below levels that caused effects, uncertainty in some studies about the potential effects of even low levels had led to them taking action to protect infants and young children.
But FSAI deputy chief executive Alan Reilly said that EFSA had evaluated the Canadian opinion on BPA and still concluded it was safe.
"All of the risks have been assessed and they have come to the conclusion that there is no danger, even for newborns at the levels they are exposed to it," he said.
While mothers could choose to use BPA-free bottles if they wished, the FSAI would not advise them against using those made with BPA.
Market leader Philips Avent said their BPA-free bottles were available online and they would make them available in Irish stores if consumers demanded them.
- Text Size

Photosales
niJobfinder
niCarfinder
Home Delivery
Propertynews














All of the risks have been assessed and they have come to the conclusion that there is no danger, even for newborns at the levels they are exposed to it," he said.
And we are are supposed to believe that?
Aye sure thalidomide was safe too....
Posted by catchyerselfon | 16.03.09, 22:43 GMT
killer milk. Brilliant. What lie is next. Suicide biscuits, no. Maybe mentally deranged crisps
Posted by Kevin | 16.03.09, 19:13 GMT
Sounds about right here they don't seem to care about our safety even that of small babies.
Posted by Kerry | 16.03.09, 17:25 GMT
All this is, is scare mongering. If you heeded EVERYTHING that is said by these food standard 'experts' you would be eating NOTHING.
Years ago they said too much coffee was bad for you, THEN years later they decide coffee IS good for you.They have done the same with other foods as well.
Best not to listen to a word ANY of them say.
Posted by Stuart | 16.03.09, 15:15 GMT
Think you are over reacting to this article H. A. Millar, as it says in the article 'although toxicological techniques were not yet sophisticated enough to prove this definitively' which means the professor could be exaggerating or hypothesising.
If the FSAI and EFSA say its ok then it must be, the uk and ireland has some of the best food safety standards in the world. How many BPA related deaths/cancer links have you read about?
By the way do you buy solely organic products for you child as well?
and before you mention it I have a seven month old son.
Posted by A-D | 16.03.09, 14:11 GMT
I think it's madness to permit the continued sale of such bottles. I have a six month old daughter who has been using BPA bottles. I am disgusted because I was aware of this problem for several months but there was absolutely no information on the bottle manufacturers packaging to tell me that the bottles were BPA. Tommy Tippee now manufacture BPA free bottles which I have ordered from their website, however, astonishingly they continue to make the BPA versions as well. It is horrible to think that innocent babies and new Mums are subjected to this in the UK. I just wish all Mums knew of this problem and boycotted the BPA bottles for good.
Posted by H. A. Millar | 16.03.09, 10:21 GMT