Woman (50) asks for Oxbridge graduate egg donor
Friday, 5 December 2008
Most mothers want their children to become intelligent, rounded individuals. More often than not it is left up to the forces of nature and nurture to make this dream a reality. But one woman is taking no chances.
Sally Adams, 50, is appealing for an egg donor to help her conceive a child, but has asked that only women who graduated from either Oxford or Cambridge come forward.
For more than a decade, Ms Adams has tried and failed to become a mother, spending more than £15,000 on IVF treatment in the process. Despite living in Hampstead, north London, she believes there is a better chance of finding an intellectual donor from outside the capital and wants women from the country's two most elite universities to come forward and donate their eggs.
"Oxford is a very good possible catchment area," she said. "Many of my roots are there. I own a house in Oxford and I studied at Oxford University. Oxford and Cambridge are the seats of people who are both academic and intellectual and often very altruistic. An egg donor needs to be under 32 years old, and I am looking for someone who is educated, intellectual and possibly has connections with the colleges."
Ms Adams, an academic, is single and has previously been through IVF cycles with donor eggs, travelling as far as Crete to carry out the process. But problems with the donated eggs meant she never became pregnant. She said: "I love and adore children and I would always put the child first. I just know that it is right for me."
In England, it is against the law to pay for eggs or sperm. But Ms Adams said she would pay all medical and out-of-pocket expenses.
She has already acquired sperm from a donor in London, but said finding an appropriate egg donor had proved more difficult. "There might be a young woman who liked the idea of not being responsible for a child but would know their genes were being carried on in someone else," she said.
In America it is not uncommon for couples looking for donors to specify what height they want their donors to be or what colour hair or eyes they want them to have. In the late 1970s the American millionaire Robert Klark Graham set up a sperm bank in an underground bunker in California.
The Repository for Germinal Choice stored only the choicest sperm and, rather than wait for donors to come forward, Mr Klark Graham went out and looked for "genius" donors.
He reportedly convinced three Nobel Prize winners to donate their sperm. However, the only contributor to become known publicly was William Shockley, a Nobel laureate in physics.
Among the criticisms levelled at Mr Klark Graham was that he was a Nazi seeking to create a master race, but he claimed he simply wanted to take advantage of scientific possibilities.
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.





















I am against too much interference with nature, particularly where human pro-creation is concerned. I think egg donation is far too invasive, especially since it needs to be combined with in vitro fertilisation and then direct implantation in the uterus. Such high tech medicine greatly interferes with the natural selection process and so is much more likely to result in defective progeny. Simple Sperm donation (for direct insertion into the vagina) seems safer to me - so long as the male donor and recipient female have both been screened for hereditary diseases too, rather than merely selected for high intelligence and creativity. I believe it is right to discourage people who suffer from serious hereditary medical and mental problems from procreating. As far as I am concerned this is basic social responsibility, common sense and civic sense and has absolutely nothing to do with creation of a master race. We all have a duty to minimize the chance of children being born with special n
Posted by Marina | 09.12.08, 20:22 GMT
That's weird: She said: "I love and adore children and I would always put the child first." whereas some unborn children have died in the IVF processes done to her. But the next phrase reveals the truth: "I just know that it is right for me."
Posted by Palo | 06.12.08, 08:01 GMT
that's a very arrogant view on someone you dont even know Sally! who are you to just condem her outright and call her an old spinster!
Posted by Tweedy | 05.12.08, 12:47 GMT
Gross! This lady is old enough to be a grandmother! Instead of "shopping" for the genetic make-up of a future baby (who will sadly enough be denied a father), this old spinster should do something positive like give foster children a home.
Posted by Sally | 05.12.08, 07:58 GMT