Primark has denied allegations of forced labour at its factories as a Northern Irish shopper found a “cry for help” label in a pair of trousers bought in the Belfast store.
Earlier this week a £10 dress bought in a branch of the low-cost fashion chain in Swansea, Wales contained a label sewn with the message “forced to work exhausting hours” and a cheap top from the same store read: “Degrading sweatshop conditions”.
And now a Co Fermanagh woman who purchased a pair of trousers from Primark in Belfast claims to have found a handwritten note from China.
Karen Wisínska said she bought the trousers in June 2011 but had never worn them. She discovered the note just last week.
She sent it to Amnesty International, who said the note, wrapped around a prison identity card, pleaded for help from the international community and condemned the Chinese government for alleged human rights violations.
The writer claimed to be a prisoner in the Xiang Nan Prison in China’s Hubei Province and forced to work 15 hours a day.
A statement from Primark said it was “clear” that the incidents arose from merchandise bought several years ago.
The dress and top from Swansea were made in different countries, although Primark did not specify which, but appeared to be of “a very similar type”, a company spokesman said.
They were on sale in 2013, whereas the trousers bought in Northern Ireland were last ordered by Primark in 2009.
The company claimed the factory where the trousers were made has been inspected nine times by its “ethical standards team” since 2009 and no prison or evidence of forced labour was found.
A spokesman for Primark said: “Despite growing suspicions in relation to the origin of the labels and the considerable time delay since the garments were bought, Primark knows its responsibilities to the workers in its supply chain and has already started detailed investigations.”
The retailer requested the return of the three items and investigations have started.
A statement said 10,000 factory audits have been carried out at suppliers since 2015 and said such incidents are treated “very seriously”.
Patrick Corrigan, the Northern Ireland programme director for Amnesty International, called on the government to amend its Modern Day Slavery Bill to up controls on company supply chains.
“It is a horrific tale,” he added. “It’s very difficult to know whether it's genuine, but the fear has to be that this is just the tip of the iceberg.”
It is the latest ethical setback for the retailer since the Rana Plaza factory disaster in 2013, in which more than 1,000 people died in a tragedy that raised questions about labourers the cut-price clothing for Primark and other Western clothing retailers.
In 2008 an investigation by the BBC's Panorama found that children as young as 11 had been sub-contracted to sew beads and sequins on to Primark tops in India, prompting a new drive against sweatshops by the chain.
Gap and other UK high street names were also caught up in controversy over low pay and working conditions in factories abroad.
Whatever the outcome of the investigation into the labels, the scandal has made many shoppers question the true price of discount fashion.
Rebecca Gallagher, 25, who bought the dress in Swansea, told the South Wales Evening Post: “You hear all sorts of stories about people working in sweatshops abroad – it made me so guilty that I can never wear that dress again.”
Source: The Independent