Viewpoint: How the army held the line in Ulster
Tuesday, 31 July 2007
From midnight, the Army's role in Northern Ireland has changed utterly - in place of Operation Banner, the longest in British military history, comes operation normality, when the 5,000 troops will be ready for deployment anywhere in the world. They can back up the police, in dire emergency, but otherwise will be training for operations in Iraq, Afghanistan or wherever the Government sends them.
Since soldiers took their first steps 38 years ago on the streets of
Londonderry, on the orders of Harold Wilson, they have been an essential
part of the security and, latterly, the political scene. They stepped
between warring factions, in support of a battered police force, and
eventually - 30 years on - were able to hand back control to the civil
authorities.
There were many highs and lows during that period,
marked by attacks on them by paramilitaries and infrequent targeted
operations against the would-be killers. The whole truth about these
skirmishes - who ordered them and who knew about them in advance - may never
be known, but the casualty figures speak for themselves. There were 763
service deaths and 6,100 injuries over 38 years, carried out by anonymous
attackers in civilian clothes.
Those who opposed the role of the
Army and supported the attempts by paramilitaries to oust it will pick on
isolated incidents of unjustified retaliation, like Bloody Sunday, to
criticise it. Terrible mistakes were made, facing a brutal and elusive
enemy, but in the main the Army has been a force for stability, holding the
line while the politicians have slowly measured up to the task of
reconciliation.
Who doubts that without the Army's presence, during
the worst of the Drumcree disturbances, or without the watchtowers along the
south Armagh border, the anarchy which the paramilitaries represented would
have been much worse? It was only when the IRA and others realised that they
were losing their wars that they chose a different political direction.
The inquiries and inquests into who killed whom and how are destined to
continue for years to come, with the Army and police having to explain how
the intelligence war was fought and eventually won. Unsavoury deals had to
be done, in the heat of what became a long-drawn-out battle, but they are a
feature of every conflict, and the Army's losses at Warrenpoint, Ballygawley
and Deal must never be forgotten.
For many years, the IRA held to
the belief that "one more heave" would remove the Army's presence,
but they came to understand its commitment and endurance. Generals who had
taken back the Falklands were never going to abandon Northern Ireland, so
Sinn Fein's political re-awakening began. The Army has much to be proud of,
and citizens have much to be thankful for.
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.

"isolated incidents".No mention of so many others though less in number as was with Bloody Sunday, though they are yet also isolated incidents. There were many and then some. No mention of torture and depraved captivity in the Holywood Barracks as an example. No mention of breaking down doors in the middle of the night where children had been sleeping only to hear the voices of bullies with large guns take away fathers most of whom were innocent but were born of the "wrong faith" in the "wrong district". To throw blinders on the history of Northern Ireland and have it printed in a respected medium is disgraceful.
If authorities had spent the same energy, or even close to it, on the loyalist factions during that time, I might be closer to agreeing for the soldiers that lost their lives are to be given the same time. It's a shame for those young men's lives that people like you are still blind.
Posted by ciaran | 11.09.08, 04:25 GMT
While feeling deep regret for the families of British soldiers who fought in NI I don't see the end of Operation Banner as the end of a glorious chapter in the history of the British army. They may have brought the IRA to the negotiating table - and even that's a doubtful hypothesis - but they did not defeat them: and that was their primary task. Of course, ultimately the major blame for the length of the Troubles must be that of successive British governments, Labour and Conservative, but Bloody Sunday - as the final report will show - was a failure in British Army leadership and of English regiments in particular. I'm afraid we saw a re-run of that failed leadership in Basra recently. Time, methinks, to look closely as how British army officers are trained and personnel recruited. I recall the first day they arrived in Belfast: lost, confused and arrogant. One of their first jobs was to round up law-abiding, middle-aged people like my parents coming out of an Anglican church!!
Posted by Dr David Green | 10.09.08, 13:15 GMT