Why the arts needs creative accountancy
There's more to cultural life than just how much per head is spent, says Dr Sam Burnside
Friday, 4 January 2008
The current public consultation on the proposed arts allocation ends today. We, the public, have been urged to respond, and to lend our support to the calls for more money 'for the arts'. This is my attempt to do just that.
In the last few days I have read most of the advice issued by the
acknowledged 'key institutional players'; in addition, I have talked to some
of those individuals who are also known as 'key players' in the arts in
Northern Ireland.
I have to say, I am rather overwhelmed by the
unusually sophisticated grasp of mathematics that my brief investigation has
uncovered; overwhelmed, as I do not for one moment doubt that these
institutions and individuals have done their sums, and that the arts have a
significant and measurable part to play in supporting, among other things,
tourism, the growth of cross-cultural understanding and the fostering of
diversity and social cohesion our image abroad, employment, and the local
and regional economies.
On the other hand I am rather underwhelmed
by the scope of the argument as it is currently being set out.
The
problem is, the form of evidence being marshalled appears to be premised on
a belief that everything can be counted and that the arts can be marshalled,
like a kind of non-violent seventh cavalry, in order to support other forms
of social endeavour. This seems to me to be a meagre and rather soul-less
interpretation of the nature, and of the core values, of the arts.
Yes, we do live in hard times: on December 10, last year, this newspaper
reported on a protest on arts funding cuts held at Stormont. The next day
the same newspaper carried an editorial highlighting a projected shortfall
in the funding of the fire service and referring to similar pressures on
other public services.
Those who do such sums say that the fire
service here spends a fifth less per head of population than Britain. It
worries me that this is the same argument - only the players are different!
- that points out that public support for the arts amounts to £6.13 in NI
compared to £11.93 in Scotland.
I should like to see the very
unique values that the arts rest upon being articulated with more force and
more passion. There is surely a very important challenge that ought to be
put to our politicians; in facing 21st century social, economic and
technological change, opening up vast prospects and equally vast challenges,
our assembly members have a duty to pay particular attention to fostering
imagination, creativity and innovation - the qualities that lie at the heart
of arts production and appreciation.
The arts are too important to
be justified as mere commodities. They form a great record of human dreams,
aspirations, and disinterested endeavour. But underpinning that is the human
ability to engage in creative endeavour. This is where we must focus our
investment, for creativity and innovation is the well-spring of a healthy
society and the distinguishing feature of the fully-engaged individual.
What I believe we should be calling for is the establishment of a holistic
cultural approach, embedded in the programme for government and giving
expression to a potent and effective government strategy that sets out to
support creative endeavour.
This should be based on a policy that
recognises the power of each of us to utilise our strengths for fluid and
flexible and imaginative and innovative thinking, and for applying
creativity in our collective life here; that policy should in turn be
informed by the clear articulation of a value system that acknowledges the
tremendous potential that this community possesses; a potential that is only
partially realised and encouraged.
I have no difficulty with
evidence-based decision making - however, the approach being taken forms
only one segment in what is a much wider debate about the nature of
civilised society.
Where the danger lies for committed individuals
and ultimately for the wider professional and amateur creative community,
but most of all for the health of our wider community, is in allowing too
few to set the agenda too narrowly. It is time to open up the debate - part
of such a dialogue should be to challenge our assembly members to defend
their underlying values and to move the argument forward by talking about a
people-focused, vibrant cultural policy that encompasses the arts but takes
on board the need to foster conditions that grow and esteem human
imagination and creativity. Wordsworth had it more or less right:
The world is too much with us; late and soon, Getting and spending, we lay
waste our powers; Little we see in nature that is ours: We have given our
hearts away, a sordid boon!
Sam Burnside is a poet and founder
of the Verbal Arts Centre. He is a former member of the NI Arts Council
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.
