Peter Mandelson: Don't let Labour sink back into its old instincts
I hope Gordon Brown feels like a man liberated to develop his own philosophy
Friday, May 11, 2007
People ask how much Tony Blair has achieved: I say he's changed the
political weather. Before Tony Blair became Labour leader, the legacy of
Thatcherism reigned supreme. People thought that government had to be "
cruel to be efficient".
The Tories warned in the 1997 election that "you can't have a minimum wage
because it will cost two million jobs". Similarly the whole Tory argument in
1997 was based on the proposition that "much as we might want new hospitals
and schools, shorter hospital waiting lists and less overcrowded classrooms,
we can't have them because there's no way the nation can afford it - and any
way the top priority before anything else must be tax cuts".
The British people never liked this much. It wasn't in keeping with their
fundamental sense of fairness, but they didn't trust Labour to combine
governing competence with social concern. People feared a Labour government
would mean a loss of control of public finances, strikes settled by beer and
sandwiches at No 10, and a run on the pound. And they had good grounds
because every previous Labour government had fallen into one or all of those
traps.
Tony Blair has transformed Labour into the natural party of government, not
by sacrificing principle and becoming, as his critics on the left would say,
just like the Tories, but by using power responsibly to promote Labour's
social democratic ends.
There are still problems with public services, but no one can doubt the
scale of new investment, the mushrooming of new school and hospital
buildings, the growth in numbers of teachers, doctors and nurses and the
improved responsiveness of services to individual need.
Far fewer people are living in poverty: not just 700,000 children, but a
lower proportion of pensioners than the population as a whole - a first in
the whole post-war period. And working families as a whole have a far better
deal when it comes to parental leave and childcare.
Tony Blair has made Britain into a modern European social democratic
country. In 2007 political debate is not about whether we can afford an NHS,
but who can run it best. It's not about reducing the size of the state as a
matter of ideological choice, but how to promote more social responsibility
and how to help families to cope with the stresses of working life.
To smart people in the London elites, whose daily contact with these
fundamentals is marginal, these achievements may seem trifling. For many of
them nothing matters by comparison with Iraq. They ignore, of course, the
other achievements of Tony Blair's commitment to international engagement -
successful humanitarian intervention in Sierra Leone and Kosovo, aid for
Africa and climate change. But Blair's domestic achievement in restoring and
modernising the British welfare state will prove more significant in the
long-term judgement of history.
The interesting question for British politics is whether Blairism will
continue to be the ideological reference point for Labour as Thatcherism is,
nearly two decades on, for the Conservatives. Will Labour remain "New
Labour" at heart? The culture of the party has changed a good deal. But the
temptation will always be there to go back to the old ways of putting the
party first and the public second - of talking to ourselves when we should
be listening to others - with the result that the party will end up losing.
The biggest question for Labour's future will be whether the default
position is to take or avoid risks; whether the politically correct will
prevail over what is harder to sell to the party; and whether the New Labour
reforms will be built upon with fresh vigour.
Much of British politics has been reported through the narrow prism of
Blair-Brown rivalries. From yesterday that is history. Gordon Brown will
assume the Labour leadership from a position of unprecedented strength.
There may or may not be a candidate from the old left. If there is, it will
be a welcome opportunity for the party to demonstrate its determination to
stick with New Labour. Gordon Brown can count on the full loyalty of all of
Tony Blair's most ardent admirers in sticking to that course.
Of course, Gordon is entitled to develop his philosophy and policy in his
own way. I hope he now feels like a man liberated to do this. He should be
different in style from Blair - he can afford to be - but in his political
approach we should give him every backing in ensuring that Labour does not
sink back into the old introspection, the old business of listening to the
party and not the voters, and the knee-jerk instincts of the old left.
New Labour is Tony Blair's legacy but it should also be Gordon Brown's.
The writer is EU Trade Commissioner and a former cabinet minister