Victims' chief still not agreed
Friday, 17 August 2007
Ian Paisley and Martin McGuinness still haven't agreed the appointment of a new Victims' Commissioner - busting their own deadline for announcing the job.
Seven months after the job was advertised and five months after a shortlist
was compiled, the two First Ministers still haven't announced a successful
candidate.
In June, they told the Assembly they planned to announce
the appointment before MLAs began their summer break on July 10.
The delay has raised speculation the leaders are in dispute over who should
be appointed to the £65,000-a-year position.
Or they could
hold concerns about the selection process - and may re-run it. However, they
have already told the Assembly that the "complete process was overseen
and certificated by the independent assessor".
Their office
will only say Mr Paisley and Mr McGuinness are still considering their
decision.
"We are aiming to make a decision on the appointment
process as soon as practicable," a spokesman said.
Forty-six
people applied for the job after it was advertised in January. Thirteen
people were interviewed in March.
A shortlist was handed to the
ministers almost as soon as they took up office on May 8.
Reports
say that shortlist includes former UTV presenter Mike Nesbitt and Marie
Breen Smyth, a University of Wales lecturer who used to run the Institute of
Conflict Studies in Belfast.
The Victims Commissioner's job was
linked to controversy last year after a court case revealed that Bertha
McDougall was given the job temporarily as a political favour to Mr Paisley.
A High Court judge declared her appointment illegal. The Northern Ireland
Office, which appointed Mrs McDougall, is currently appealing that decision.
Lord Justice Gillen also ordered an investigation by the Attorney General into
the possibility of an NIO cover-up of its actions in making the appointment.
In a report published last month, Peter Scott QC concluded that Government
officials did not act illegally. He also reported that Mr Paisley had asked
for the process to be kept secret.
Alliance deputy leader Naomi
Long, who has questioned the First Ministers about the appointment, said it
is "absolutely imperative" that they come to a decision soon.
"I don't think the delay is acceptable," she said. "We can't
afford any further delay."
She said the failure to make an
appointment is "a cause for concern".
If the statement
about "a decision on the appointment process" implies that the
process could be re-run, the East Belfast MLA said she would be worried
about months more of delay.
"This should be a matter of
urgency," she said. "We want the voice of victims heard. At the
moment you hear a lot disparate voices, but you need someone to process it
all, consider it and present it.
"At the same time, we don't
want any shortcuts. Confidence of victims in the person appointed is
essential. The process has to be open and transparent, so whoever is
appointed enjoys the full confidence of the community they're serving.
"We wouldn't want anyone to undergo the traumatic situation Bertha
McDougall found herself in, where she entered the job, did it very well and
ended up under a cloud because of the actions of the NIO.
"
There is already a commission set up by the NIO to look into past and the
legacy of the Troubles. It's important that victims are fully included in
that, and the only way to ensure their views are properly heard is for a
commissioner to represent them."
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.



