Chilcot: Jeremy Corbyn apologises for Labour leader Tony Blair going to war in Iraq
'For him to be able to stand up there and give us that apology - it means more than if the right bloke had done it'
Jeremy Corbyn has apologised on behalf of Labour for Tony Blair's decision to go to war in Iraq, saying it was a "stain" on the party and country.
The Labour leader's comments came after a meeting with the families of some of the victims of the 2003 conflict and the occupation that followed.
The anti-war Labour leader apologised to the people of Iraq, the families of soldiers who were killed or wounded and the British public.
In a speech in London he said: "The decision to go to war in Iraq has been a stain on our party and our country but we now have the chance to work together to build more constructive and mutually beneficial relationships with the rest of the world based on cooperation, peace and international justice."
Mr Corbyn, who was a prominent figure in the opposition movement to the Iraq War, did not directly name Mr Blair or call for him to face any sort of sanctions for his role.
But he repeated the comments - first made in the Commons - suggesting that Parliament had been lied to by Mr Blair's government and that consequences may follow.
He said MPs were "misled by a small number of leading figures in the government" who were committed to war and were "none too scrupulous" about how they made the case.
"We now know that Parliament was misled in the run-up to war and MPs should now decide how it should deal with that 13 years later, just as all those who took the decisions laid bare in the Chilcot Report must face up to the consequences, whatever they may be."
Following his meeting with the families of veterans, Mr Corbyn said: "I apologised to them for the decisions taken by our then government that led this country into a disastrous war.
"It's a disaster that occurred when my party was in government, 140 of my then colleagues in the Parliamentary Labour Party opposed it at the time, as did many, many, many members of my party and trade unions and many other organisations in this country.
"Many more have since said that they regret their vote. My fellow MPs who voted for war in 2003 did so on the basis of loyalty to the government and information and intelligence which the Chilcot Report has confirmed to have been false.
Peter Brierley, whose son Shaun died in Iraq, says an apology meant more coming from Jeremy Corbyn. pic.twitter.com/PC3c3kMxGo— Scott D'Arcy (@DArcysj) 6 July 2016
"They were misled by a small number of leading figures in the government who were committed to joining the US invasion of Iraq come what may and were none too scrupulous about how they made their case for war.
"Politicians and political parties can only grow stronger by acknowledging when they get it wrong and by facing up to their mistakes.
"So I now apologise sincerely on behalf of my party for the disastrous decision to go to war in Iraq."
Mr Corbyn also called for Britain to join "30 other countries including Germany and Spain that already support giving the International Criminal Court the power to prosecute those responsible for the crime of military aggression".
In a sign of the deep divisions that still exist within Labour over Iraq - and the continued unrest over Mr Corbyn - the party leader was heckled by some of his own MPs during his Commons speech in response to David Cameron's statement on Sir John Chilcot's inquiry into the Iraq War.
After making his apology in a second speech, Labour MP Mike Gapes - a former chairman of the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee - condemned the leader's move.
He tweeted: "Party conference and PLP (Parliamentary Labour Party) never been asked to apologise. Jeremy did not apologise in his statement in Parliament. Why not ? Not in My Name."
Peter Brierley, whose son Shaun died during the conflict, was among those who had a private meeting with Mr Corbyn and heard his public apology.
He said: "It's something I would have expected from Jeremy - he's always been anti-war.
"For him to be able to stand up there and give us that apology - it means more than if the right bloke had done it.
"He is under fire, he did not have to do that."
Mr Brierley said it was right that Mr Corbyn did not attack Mr Blair in his speech, adding: "That is not what he was there for. He was talking about the Chilcot Report and what happened in Iraq and he did not mention legalities and he didn't mention people who did wrong."
But the 65-year-old, from Batley, West Yorkshire, challenged the former prime minister to a face-to-face meeting to explain his decision.
"I know that he does not want to face us - he seems to be frightened in our presence," he said.
Corbyn's speech in full
Here is Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn's Chilcot speech in Church House, Westminster, in full:
"I'd like to start today by remembering and honouring the 179 British servicemen and women killed and the thousands wounded during the Iraq war and their families as well as the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who have died as a result of the invasion and occupation of Iraq launched by the US and British governments 13 years ago.
I have just had a private meeting with some of the families of the British dead as well as with war veterans and Iraqis who have lost family members as a result of the war as I have continued to do over the past dozen years.
It is always a humbling experience to witness the resolve and resilience of those families and their unwavering commitment to seek truth and justice for those they've lost in Iraq.
They've waited seven years for Sir John Chilcot's report.
Chilcot report: Tony Blair didn't tell truth about WMDs, the deal with Bush or the warnings of fallout
Chilcot: Tony Blair response to report in full
Tony Blair decided to invade Iraq before telling public but was 'looking for a reason to do it', says Admiral Lord West
- Anti-war supporters gather to demand 'truth and justice'
It was right that the inquiry heard evidence from such a wide range of people and that the origins, conduct and aftermath of the war should have been examined in such detail.
But the extraordinary length of time it has taken to see the light of day is clearly a matter for deep regret and has weakened its capacity to hold those responsible to account.
There is no doubt that the decision to invade and occupy Iraq in March 2003 was the most significant foreign policy decision taken by a British government in modern times.
It divided parliament and set the government of the day against a majority of the British people as well as against the weight of global opinion.
The war was not in any way as Sir John Chilcot says a "last resort".
It was an act of military aggression launched on a false pretext as the inquiry accepts and has long been regarded as illegal by the overwhelming weight of international legal opinion.
It led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq and the displacement of millions of refugees.
It devastated Iraq's infrastructure and society.
The US-British occupation led to a lethal sectarianism that turned into a civil war. Instead of protecting security at home or abroad, the war fuelled and spread terrorism across the region including in the countries that launched it.
Sunday's suicide bomb attack in Baghdad which killed over 250 people, the deadliest so far, was carried out by a group whose origins lie in the aftermath of the invasion.
By any measure, the invasion and occupation of Iraq was a catastrophe.
The decision to invade in 2003 on the basis of what the Chilcot report calls "flawed intelligence" about weapons of mass destruction has had a far-reaching impact on us all.
It's also led to a fundamental breakdown in trust in politics and our institutions of government.
The tragedy is that while the governing class got it so horrifically wrong, the majority of our people called it right.
On February 15, 2003 along with 1.5 million people spanning the entire political spectrum of Britain and tens of millions of others across the world, many of us marched against the impending war in the biggest-ever demonstration in the history of this country.
It wasn't, absolutely wasn't, that we underestimated the brutality or crimes of the Saddam Hussein dictatorship.
Many of us had campaigned against the Iraqi regime during its most bloody period when the British government and the US administration were busy supporting and arming it as the 1996 Scott Inquiry demonstrated.
We were not not apologists for Saddam Hussein in any way whatsoever.
We could see that this state broken by sanctions and war posed no military threat, that the WMD evidence was flimsy and confected, that going to war without UN authorisation was profoundly dangerous, that foreign invasion and occupation would be resisted by force and that it could set off a series of uncontrollable and destructive events.
If only the majority of our members of parliament had listened to the wisdom of our own people when they voted on March 18 2003 against waiting for the United Nations authorisation through a second resolution the course of events might have been very, very different.
There are a large number of members in parliament today including dozens of my Labour colleagues who voted to stop the Iraq war.
But none of us will take any satisfaction from this report. Instead, all of us will feel saddened at what has been revealed and what we must now reflect on.
The report has dug deep into the many... the litany of failures of planning for the occupation the calamitous decisions to stand down the Iraqi army and to dissolve the entire Iraqi state.
But the reality is it was the original decision to follow the United States president into an unprovoked war in the most volatile region of the world and impose a colonial-style occupation that led to every further disaster.
The government's September 2002 dossier with its false claim that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction that could be deployed in 45 minutes was only the most notorious of the deceptions.
Major General Michael Laurie told the inquiry, and I quote: "We knew at the time that the purpose of the dossier was precisely to make a case for war rather than setting out the available intelligence."
It goes without saying that never again should intelligence be fixed around policy - instead of fixing policy around intelligence and legality.
Military action in Iraq not only turned a humanitarian crisis into a humanitarian disaster it also convulsed the entire Middle East region and beyond just as military intervention for regime change in Libya in 2011 left the country in the grip of warring militias and terror groups.
And the Iraq war increased the threat of terrorism to our own country. Baroness Manningham-Buller, former head of MI5, made this very clear to the inquiry. I invite people to read her evidence.
There are many lessons that need to be drawn from the Iraq war and the investigation carried out by Sir John Chilcot for our country, government and parliament as well as for my own party, the Labour Party.
They include the need for a more open and independent relationship with the United States, particularly as we face the prospects of a new and potentially much more hawkish presidency and for a foreign policy based on upholding international law and the authority of the United Nations which seeks peaceful solutions to all international disputes.
We also need much stronger oversight of the security and intelligence services, full restoration of proper cabinet government and to give parliament the decisive say over any future decision to go to war based on objective information, not through government discretion, but through a War Powers Act which I hope will be passed rapidly in the British parliament.
Finally, we need Britain to join the 30 countries, including Germany and Spain, that already support giving the International Criminal Court the power to prosecute those responsible for the crime of military aggression.
There are no more important decisions a Member of Parliament ever gets asked to make than those relating to war and peace.
The very least that MPs and the country should be able to expect is rigorous and objective evidence on which to base their decisions.
We now know that parliament was misled in the run-up to war and MPs should now decide how it should deal with that 13 years later just as all those who took the decision laid bare in the Chilcot report must face up to the consequences, whatever they may be.
As I said earlier, I have just been meeting a group of families, military servicemen and women who lost their loved ones, Iraq war veterans and Iraqi citizens who lost relatives as a result of that war, that the US and British governments launched.
I apologised to them for the decisions taken by our then government that led the country into a disastrous war.
It was a disaster that occurred when we were in government, 140 of my then colleagues opposed it at the time, as did many, many, many members of my party, of trade unions and of many other organisations in this country.
Many more have since said that they regret their vote. My fellow MPs who voted for the war in 2003 did so on the basis of loyalty to the government and information and intelligence which the Chilcot report has been confirmed to have been false.
They were misled by a small number of leading figures who were committed to joining the United States invasion come what may and were none too scrupulous about how they made the case for war.
Politicians and political parties can only grow stronger by acknowledging when they get it wrong and by facing up to their mistakes.
So I now apologise sincerely on behalf of my party for the disastrous decision to go to war in Iraq.
The apology is owed first of all to the people of Iraq. Hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost and the country is still living with the devastating consequences of the war and the forces it unleashed.
They have paid the greatest price for the most serious foreign policy calamity of the last 60 years.
The apology is also owed to the families of those soldiers who died in Iraq or who have returned home injured and incapacitated.
They did their duty, but it was in a conflict they should never have been sent to.
Finally, it is an apology to the millions of British citizens who feel our democracy was traduced and undermined by the way in which the decision to go to war was taken on the basis of secret 'I will be with you, whatever' understandings given to the US president that have been now publicly exposed by Sir John Chilcot's report published this morning.
Our society has also suffered consequences. Community relations have been compromised and damaged, civil liberties have been undermined and the menace of terrorism has grown as a result.
Our party has learned the lessons. One of the three main pillars of my election as leader of the party last year was for a different kind of foreign policy, to uphold international law, to seek peaceful solutions to international disputes, to respect the role and the authority of the United Nations and always to treat war as absolutely the last resort.
The decision to go to war in Iraq has been a stain on our party and our country but we now have the chance to work together to build more constructive and mutually balanced relationships with the rest of the world based on co-operation, peace and international justice.
Thank you very much"