SF leadership talks bring new hope stalemate may be broken
Monday, 17 November 2008
There were signs last night of possible progress in the talks to secure Northern Ireland’s power-sharing government after Sinn Fein revealed its party leadership had met to discuss the issue.
Sinn Fein confirmed its party executive met at the weekend in Dublin to be briefed by leader Gerry Adams on the state of negotiations with the DUP.
The development comes after the DUP executive met on Friday night to discuss the state of talks aimed at ending the stand-off that has blocked cabinet meetings at Stormont since June.
Sources characterised the weekend developments as a sign that progress was being made, but did not say that a deal had been tied down. Sinn Fein’s party executive was briefed on Saturday by Mr Adams and Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness and Sinn Fein’s Assembly members will meet at Stormont this morning to discuss developments.
The two parties, which dominate the Assembly’s Executive and share the office of First and Deputy First Minister, have been divided on a series of issues including unionist resistance to the immediate devolution of policing and justice powers from Westminster. The parties have been engaged in protracted negotiations.
There has been constant speculation over the state of the behind-the-scenes talks between the parties. Critics claimed that the future of the fledgling government, formed a year and a half ago, has been endangered by the division between the two parties.
Republicans have blocked Executive meetings since June, insisting that the DUP was effectively blocking issues of importance to Sinn Fein and its supporters. The DUP countered that republicans were frustrating the work of government to force their priorities up the political agenda.
Sinn Fein is demanding the transfer of justice powers and points to the St Andrews agreement of 2006 which set May of this year as a target date for the move. The DUP has said it is not bound by any timetable and that it will not move on the issue until it believes the unionist community is ready for the development.
In July the parties agreed that neither of them would take the post of Justice Minister if and when the office was established. The move sparked speculation that the Alliance Party may emerge as an agreed third candidate to take the job.
But the parties are also split on issues such as education reform, the introduction of an Irish language act and the development of the Maze prison site. Leading Protestant and Catholic church figures recently proposed a compromise on plans by Sinn Fein education minister Caitriona Ruane to scrap academic selection.
There have been fears that if a deal cannot be secured, it may require the help of the British and Irish governments.
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.
Also in this section
- Blair attacks 'conspiracy theorist' critics in US interview
- Were there any policing and justice side deals?
- Grim history as IRA's P O’Neill echoed down the telephone line
- Court rejects Sinn Fein MLA McCartney’s compensation claim
- Policing and justice ‘will be independent’



















As I predicted yesterday, SF are about to cave in once again to unionists. How embarrassing...
Posted by Billy for the Truth | 18.11.08, 09:05 GMT
if they do get it together some punters might be a bit better off - paddy power are offering odds on spreadbets for when they will next meet
Posted by whaddyareckon | 17.11.08, 15:51 GMT
Are these has beens still getting paid for not getting on with their jobs?
Posted by Sean the Sheep | 17.11.08, 12:51 GMT
democracy not your thing then brian?
Posted by Paul | 17.11.08, 12:03 GMT
If the SDLP got their act together, they would probably be able to steal a lot of the SF electorate.
Posted by mickey | 17.11.08, 12:00 GMT
hav'nt you heard brian,the IRA disbanded a few years ago! get your head out of past and move on! its people like you who are not willing to move on that will keep this country in the mess that its in!!
Posted by steve m | 17.11.08, 11:39 GMT
Its no wonder the people in the Republic of Ireland don't vote for Sinn Fein, what if Fine Gael or Fianna Fail wouldn't do what they wanted, would Sinn Fein start huffing and hold up proceedings at the Oireachtas?
This is democracy, welcome.
Should there be an Irish Language Act? Yes, I think so.
Should a new football stadium be built at the Maze? I'd prefer Belfast myself, as I believe the majority of people would if it went to a public vote!
Should Policing and Justice be devolved from Westminster? Possibly not yet, especially when one party are acting like a bunch of spoilt brats and seem to have no comprehension of how democracy works.
The DUP have the majority vote at the moment, but stupid stunts such as the protests against the homecoming parade only force some Unionists to keep voting DUP.
But that is probably the plan of Sinn Fein and the DUP, to keep dividing us, as if we all got along then they would probably cease to exist! Worth a thought.
Posted by Steven | 17.11.08, 11:19 GMT
All this mancho huffing and puffing from SF is a joke. They'll cave in to the unionists. They always do...I pity they people who still vote for them as I once did.
Posted by no longer fooled republican | 17.11.08, 08:57 GMT
We wont have the ira in charge of policing and justice. It,s not goint to happen no matter how many people vote for them.
Posted by brian | 17.11.08, 08:34 GMT