So, what have Northern Ireland's MPs been claiming for?
Friday, 19 June 2009
A sandwich press, a beige high back chair, a box of staples and minibar Pringles. No, it’s not the conveyor belt on TV’s legendary Generation Game show. These were just some of the items that Northern Ireland MPs claimed for under the parliamentary expenses system.
>>Click More Pictures to launch gallery
And there are more costly taxpayer-funded bills as well, |including London mortgage interest payments and thousands a year for food.
Yesterday was the official “disclosure day” at the House of Commons, when tens of thousands of receipts submitted by MPs were finally published online.
A great deal of the material was already in the public domain due to a leak to The Daily Telegraph earlier this year.
However, the itemised details released yesterday did include many pages of previously undisclosed information on Northern Ireland MPs.
Most attention will focus on how they have used the widely criticised London living allowance — commonly known as the second home allowance.
It covered mortgage interest, rent or hotel costs, as well as food, furniture and household bills.
The newly published details may well add to the rumbling expenses-related controversies in politics here, on such issues as double-jobbing between Westminster and the Assembly, and the payment of allowances to Sinn Fein MPs who boycott Parliament.
The officially released receipts cover a four-year period up to March 2008.
The Commons fought for years against their disclosure, but were eventually defeated by freedom of information campaigners.
That battle may not yet be over. Unlike the data obtained by the Daily Telegraph, the officially |released documents are heavily censored, with addresses, |supplier names and other details blacked out.
Inexplicably, constituency office addresses have also been redacted despite the fact they are public facilities as well as being funded by taxpayers.
Claims made by Northern Ireland MPs included:
Sinn Fein MPs Gerry Adams, Pat Doherty, Michelle Gildernew, Conor Murphy and Martin McGuinness last year each received £1,800 per month in London rental expenses. The five abstentionist MPs share two properties in the city.
Mr McGuinness’s office-running expenses meanwhile included a £19.99 sandwich press.
Ian Paisley claimed the maximum £400 per month for MP food expenses while he was Stormont’s First Minister.
SDLP leader Mark Durkan claimed £39.70 for food in March 2008.
His expenses around this period also included a £22.50 cleaning bill, a £14 laundry bill, £6.40 for “domestic sundries” and £135.50 for a TV licence at the London property he rents.
DUP MP William McCrea was also among those who claimed for a TV licence as well as mortgage interest on a London property he owns.
He also received £400 a month for food over a six month period in 2007, and £250 per month in early 2008.
The Commons paid £3,215 in hotels bills for SDLP MP Eddie McGrady over the period January to March 2008, plus £1,074 in food expenses.
Mr McGrady and Ulster Lady Sylvia Hermon are the only two Northern Ireland MPs who do not also have Assembly seats.
Lady Sylvia’s second home allowance payments in early 2008 involved £1,450 per month for rent. She did not claim for food.
The information published by the Commons today included property deal details for two of Northern Ireland’s wealthiest MPs, Alasdair McDonnell of the SDLP and the DUP’s David Simpson.
It stated that Mr McDonnell had a £460,000 interest-only mortgage on a London apartment bought in 2005, while Mr Simpson paid £318,500 for his property the following year. They have each claimed mortgage interest payments from the Commons.
Mr McDonnell claims did not include food, while Mr Simpson regularly claimed the maximum £400 per month.
Mr Simpson’s furniture expenses in 2006 included £455 for a beige high back chair.
Mr McDonnell's office-running bills included a 20p box of staples and a £3.49 Starbucks bill.
He also submitted an £83.41 Tesco shopping bill last year, comprising a number of foodstuffs including teabags, chocolate cake and Chinese stir fry items.
The SDLP MP yesterday said foodstuffs were purchased by his staff for the use of constituents at coffee mornings and at his office.
DUP couple Peter and Iris Robinson each claimed £400 per month for food in a six-month period in 2007, and £200 per month in early 2008.
They received mortgage |interest on a London Docklands apartment they jointly own.
Mrs Robinson also submitted an offices expenses receipt in 2006 for a £300 Mont Blanc fountain pen, a £6 bottle of ink and £46 for perfume.
She was not reimbursed for these items, with a Commons expenses form showing the items having been scored out.
A DUP spokesman last night said that the claim by Mrs Robinson for these items had been “submitted in error” by her office.
He said: “The Fees Office was correct not to process these items. Mrs Robinson has one of the lowest expense claims of all the Northern Ireland MPs, as well as being in the lowest 15% of expense claims in the House of Commons.”
Mrs Robinson’s expenses for living away from their Belfast home also involved a £132 hotel bill in February 2008, including a 95p mini-bar item.
DUP MP Gregory Campbell’s expenses included mortgage interest on a London property and a council tax bill of £1,509.
He also claimed £226 per month for food in early 2008.
His claims in 2007 included £2,474 in legal fees in connection with the London property acquisition.
His party colleagues Sammy Wilson and Jeffrey Donaldson received mortgage interest on a London flat they jointly own.
Their expenses claims in the first quarter of 2008 also included cleaning bills of £50 and £32. In February 2008, Mr Wilson claimed £300 for food while Mr Donaldson claimed £158.
Prior to his London property purchase, Mr Wilson claimed for hotel expenses.
In a one month period in the spring of 2005, his hotel expenses came to £820.25, with one of the hotel bills including £2.25 for “mini bar Pringles” and a £1 “charity donation”.
The expenses of senior DUP MP Nigel Dodds in February 2008 included mortgage interest of £1,424 a month, £45 for food and £65 for cleaning.
The second home allowance is likely to be substantially reformed or scrapped as part of an ongoing review of parliamentary expenses aimed at trying to claw back some credibility for Parliament.
- Text Size

Photosales
niJobfinder
niCarfinder
Home Delivery
Propertynews

















Comments
24 Comments
how i love to read all the arm chair pundits who are experts in every subject after reading something in a paper. Keep in mind that news is constructed to sell, as they saw in the buisiness " if it bleeds it leads"
The media here has constucted an image of MPs neing a bunch of robbers. but really think about it logically.
Continued in next post.......
Posted by Jordan | 21.06.09, 23:52 GMT
Please excuse my ignorance if i am wrong. But is it not the responsibility of the person making the claim to submit receipts?.
It cannot be blamed on someone in their office. If I bought a pen,bottle of ink and perfume surely i would not to give the receipt to another person to "accidently" send it to the HOC claims department to be paid. Sorry Mrs Robinson the blame stops with you. I believe your testimony has been tested and you found wanting. forgiveness from the Lord should be your concern.
Posted by David H | 20.06.09, 09:07 GMT
This is a shame and disgrace particularly for men who claim to be Christians. What will their Presbytery of the FP church say on this matter - it is of great moral significance ?
Posted by Raymond1517 | 19.06.09, 22:34 GMT
Gerry Adams in London????? Enough said
Posted by Robbie | 19.06.09, 21:36 GMT
It seems evident that the DUP see the £400 food allowance as an entitlement to be exploited at the expense of the tax payer. I would also like Iris Robinson to explain how perfume contributes to her fulfilling her public duties? The "submitted in error" excuse just does not wash!
Posted by Maria | 19.06.09, 18:04 GMT
Brian Adams - since Iris didn't spend our money on the pen does that mean she can still sit in moral judgement? Catch a grip. The woman didn't get paid the money.
Posted by Mike C | 19.06.09, 17:00 GMT
Clearly Mike/Anne have not read through what I have said -(I've paid more Tax than ever Mike has.) Our MPs have duties to carry out and ought to be compensated for this -the rules defining valid expenses must be made clear. Unlike much Legislation they were not properly scrutnised- that is the difficulty.
Posted by Malachy McAnespie | 19.06.09, 14:33 GMT
Bren, the difference is that this is public money and as such they have to be squeaky clean. I just cannot believe that they are all so overworked that they are making so many expenses claims mistakes. One or two per year maybe, but revelations on this scale are a different matter and demonstrates a clear disregard for reason. It really does seem to be one rule for us and one rule for them.
Posted by Mike | 19.06.09, 13:59 GMT
I intend to send Mrs Robinson a Bic pen through the post - then she will have no excuse to spend £300 of our money on such an item again! Let's see her sit in moral judgement on us again, if she has the nerve!
Posted by Brian Adams | 19.06.09, 13:38 GMT
Malachy - don't you get it? They created the rules - that's what's so disgusting about it! Tehn they voted against letting the taxpayer know what the rules they made up were letting them spend - doubly disgusting!!
Posted by Anne | 19.06.09, 13:15 GMT
Not capable of completing an expenses form and they are running the country!
You'd think a £300 pen could fill out the form itself removing any chance of human error.
Stephen
Posted by Stephen | 19.06.09, 13:12 GMT
Mike, it's very easy to make all these little mistakes when you are blanket submitting every receipt you get and eventually some items you shouldn't be claiming for will slip through the net.
In some ways I can understand this as while in London with work I will claim back everything I can rather than be left out of pocket from a buisness trip.
Is it a class difference though when you compare Martin's toasted sandwhich maker for £9.99 to Peter and Iris's £400 each per month or is it greed?
Posted by Bren | 19.06.09, 13:07 GMT
Funny how all these things are being 'submitted in error' and silly mistakes being made...after they've been caught out. Such an honest bunch of people!
Posted by Mike | 19.06.09, 12:47 GMT
Clearly Malachy doesn't pay tax and hence his apathy towards this subject. I think that anyone who pays tax has a right to be absolutely livid with this senseless squandering of public money and is quite within their rights to bring these wasters to book.
Posted by Mike | 19.06.09, 12:39 GMT
Taking snide shots at very decent people has become a very boring exercise., pleasing all the stupid little pocket virtuous people. The blame if any must rest with those who construct the rules. The cost of living near Parliament when in session, and of running an efficient constituency office, ought to have been very clearly defined.
Posted by Malachy McAnespie | 19.06.09, 11:48 GMT
To be fair to all the local politicians their claims fall well short of the hideous expense claims of mainland politicians.
Posted by Mike C | 19.06.09, 11:19 GMT
As far as I can tell, none of the expenditures listed above seem to be 'illegal'. As for the £400/month food bill, MP's were entitled to claim this amount without even submitting a receipt - must confess, if my job offered this facility, I'd sure do it.
The one that does stick out though is the £300 fountain pen, bit cheeky that one as a 10p Bic would do the same job. But I suppose when you're in the habit of not even paying for your own food, a little luxury item must seem insignificant!!
Posted by Stephen | 19.06.09, 10:02 GMT
claiming for £1 charity donation!!!!!
I am on the dole and have to live on about £50 a month for food, how can anyone scoff £400 worth a month?? they should all be gutbuckets at that rate!
This has shown that no matter what the system is, people will exploit it to their advantage, it is morally bankrupt
Posted by david | 19.06.09, 09:54 GMT
So Peter and Iris both claimed £400 each (£800) per month for food during a six month period in 2007.
When will they be holding a public meeting to explain this level of expenditure to their constituents in East Belfast and Strangford?
It would also be interesting to know how many evenings were spent in London during this six month period.
Has'nt Iris gone very quiet this weather she is probably spending her time letter writing using her fancy pen.
Posted by Paul | 19.06.09, 09:27 GMT
The richer get richer, the poorer get poorer.
The only way these idiots can win over the people, is to carry out the tasks they were voted in to perform e.g. secure investment to create jobs, ensure that worker's rights are adhered to (do I have to mention Visteon or Nortel)!!!!!!!!!
Posted by cd | 19.06.09, 09:19 GMT
24 Comments