Google has captured the Earth, now it's after the individual
Get a life or just Google it - the choice is yours
Monday, May 28, 2007
Internet search engine Google plans to target people's interests using data
collected on its users Lesley-Anne Henry asks: is this the next logical step
or the thin end of the orwellian wedge
Google's declaration of intent to assemble the most comprehensive database
of personal information has thrown down the gauntlet to civil libertarians.
The multi-billion pound search engine claims it wants to "better"
the internet experience by organising the world's information and collating
data on its users so it can guess what customers are searching for.
The ultimate aim is to make Google so personal that it can target people
known to be interested in certain products or services just from their
Google activities. It is expected that one day users could ask a computer
'What should I do today?' or 'Which job should I take?' and it will tell
them the answer.
In theory there should be no problem. In fact, the
new database could make life easier - perhaps even better.
For
example if you want to buy a particular book from a certain site, Google
could locate other sites selling the same book at a cheaper price or it
could recommend other books by the same author.
Also if you want
to buy a television or a holiday then the search engine could bring up the
best buy.
In establishing this database Google says it is giving
customers what they want and that any information collated will be
volunteered. Users will only be identified by name if they sign up to one of
the log-on services such as G-mail or Frugal.
Also under the Data
Protection Act information must only be used for the purposes it was given
and Google has said it plans to impose a limit on the period it keeps
personal information.
In fairness, Google has proved itself to be
the best of its kind and has in the past resisted US government court
applications to hand over personal information it holds on some users.
We already live in a closely monitored world. Store loyalty cards have been
keeping track of our shopping habits for years while CCTV cameras watch us
on the streets and some banks pass our details on to marketing companies.
There are also internet sites like Bebo and Myspace where people can easily
access detailed personal information.
So what is all the fuss about?
Critics fear the database is the next step towards an Orwellian Big Brother
state.
They see the declaration as an infringement of civil
liberties by stealth by a company that wants to turn the personal database
into a lucrative marketing tool.
Like all businesses Google is
driven to make money which it does through multi-million pound advertising
sponsorship.
This means consumers have no idea whether or not the
information being given is impartial or whether something is being
recommended of a big money deal.
In reality people would not
tolerate being followed around town by someone taking notes of everything
they buy, the reasons behind their purchase and steering them towards
certain shops.
So why should we put up with it in the virtual world?
Attempting to profile people through the sites they access may not give an
accurate portrayal. Some people, for example journalists, have to surf a
variety of sites which they would never consider entering outside of the
office.
And privacy protection campaigners fear that in certain
circumstances law enforcement agents could force internet search engines to
surrender personal information.
Google has bought the targeted
advertising company Doubleclick which monitors users on a wide range of
websites, and deploys "cookies" - small bits of software - on
people's computers to keep track of what they are looking at.
And
it has also invested £2m in genetics company 23andMe - a move which sceptics
of the database see as worrying.
However, the precise type and size
of the database problem has yet to be determined. It will change as Google's
business changes.
The best advice is, as in real life, if you are
concerned about privacy, don't give personal information unless you are sure
you know what it is going be used for both now and in the future.