Belfast Telegraph

Thursday 2 July 2015

Was vital intelligence about the Omagh bomb withheld?

By Sam Lister and Adrian Rutherford

Published 16/03/2010 | 11:41

James Baker, Omagh bomb victim
James Baker, Omagh bomb victim
Omagh bomb victim Sean McGrath
Gareth Conway, Omagh bomb victim
Esther Gibson
Elizabeth Rush
Dissident terror - flashback to the Omagh bomb attack
Breda Devine, 20 months
Olive Hawkes, aged 60
Julie Hughes, aged 21
Ann McCombe, aged 45
Mary Grimes, aged 65
Aiden Gallagher, aged 21
The bomb attack was the worst ever atrocity of Northern Ireland's decades of violence.
Brian McCrory, left, aged 54
Samantha McFarland, aged 17
Philomena Skelton, aged 39
Jolene Marlow, aged 17
The scene of the Omagh Bomb
Brenda Logue, aged 17
Alan Radford, aged 16
Bryan White, aged 27
Oran Doherty
Lorraine Wilson
Fred White
Veda Short
Geraldine Breslin
Deborah-Ann Cartwright
Gonzalo Cavedo unwittingly poses with a young child on his shoulders beside the car which seconds later exploded killing 29 people and unborn twins. Amazingly, they survived the blast
The agony of that fateful August 10 years ago, lives on for the families of the Omagh victims
Royal Ulster Constabulary Police officers stand on Market Street, the scene of the bombing in August 1998
29 people were killed in the Omagh bombing atrocity in August 1998

A new investigation must be set up to examine whether the state withheld vital intelligence from detectives hunting the Omagh bombers, a parliamentary report said today.

The parliamentary probe looked at claims that spy agencies failed to pass on crucial evidence about bombers in the days after the 1998 atrocity.

Twenty-nine people and two unborn children died in the Real IRA attack.

Today’s report by the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee also said too many questions remained unanswered over how much the security services knew about the bombers’ movements.

Speaking today, Victor Barker, whose 12-year-old son James was killed in the bombing, said he was not surprised by its findings.

“This is what we’ve suspected all along — that information was being hidden from us,” he told the Belfast Telegraph.

“There should be a proper, public inquiry with full access to all the information, because we need to know if there was some form of directive or conspiracy to make sure these people weren’t brought to justice. In 12 years two people have been charged and not one has been found guilty, and I find it absolutely amazing that this investigation was botched up in the way it was.”

In January 2009 a report by Intelligence Services Commissioner Sir Peter Gibson rejected claims that vital intelligence about the bombing was deliberately held back.

But the committee today said that Sir Peter’s report left many crucial questions unanswered about the way the atrocity was investigated.

Members said they were disturbed by suggestions that arrests could have been made quickly if there had been earlier exchanges of information.

In 2008 the BBC’s Panorama programme claimed that intelligence agency GCHQ monitored suspects' mobile phone calls as they drove to Omagh from the Republic on the day of the bombing. Panorama said this information was never passed to detectives assigned to the case.

Although the programme’s claims were later rejected by Sir Peter, today’s report claims the victims’ families still need answers.

“Far too many questions remain unanswered,” committee chairman Sir Patrick Cormack said.

The committee looked at how information is passed between intelligence agencies and police and called for details about what Special Branch knew to be revealed.

“We are particularly concerned by the suggestion that the names of individuals who owned telephones, thought to have been used in the bombing, were known to the intelligence services or to the police,” the report states.

“We seek a definitive statement from the police of whether such names were known. If they were, we seek an explanation of why no action was taken to arrest or question the owners of those telephones.”

The committee says questions remain about whether the bombing could have been pre-empted if action had been taken against the terrorist gang who carried out a spate of bombings prior to Omagh.

While dismissing the possibility that the bomb could have been prevented, Sir Peter said he could not rule in or out the possibility that ‘live’ monitoring occurred.

The committee also criticised the Government for refusing to give it sight of Sir Peter’s full report, which has been classified for security reasons.

That provokes speculation which is “not conducive to convincing us that everything that could be done has been done”, the committee said, adding it was exasperating.

Sir Patrick, the committee chairman, added that key questions remain unanswered.

“The criminal justice system has failed to bring to justice those responsible for the Omagh bombing,” he said. “The least that those who were bereaved or injured have the right to expect are answers to those questions.”

Your Comments

COMMENT RULES: Comments that are judged to be defamatory, abusive or in bad taste are not acceptable and contributors who consistently fall below certain criteria will be permanently blacklisted. The moderator will not enter into debate with individual contributors and the moderator’s decision is final. It is Belfast Telegraph policy to close comments on court cases, tribunals and active legal investigations. We may also close comments on articles which are being targeted for abuse. Problems with commenting?

Read More

From Belfast Telegraph