Donald Trump: If US intelligence released dossier it would be a 'tremendous blot' on their legacy
- Trump thanks the news organisations who did not publish "that fake news" and "nonsense"
- Trump says dossier "should never have been written or released"
- Sons Eric and Donald Jr will run Trump organisation
- Trump lawyer Sheri Dillon says Trump has “already disposed” with all publicly traded and “easily liquidated” investments
- President-elect says he will look to "repeal and replace" Obamacare and the replacement will be "far better"
- Mexico will pay for wall in some form
- Mr Trump dismisses Buzzfeed website as "failing pile of garbage"
- President-elect Donald Trump says he expects to nominate new Supreme Court justice within two weeks of inauguration
Donald Trump has suggested US intelligence agencies may be responsible for releasing a dossier containing allegations that Russia holds compromising information about him.
At his first press conference since winning November's presidential election, Mr Trump thanked media organisations which held back from publishing details from the dossier, which has reportedly been circulating in Washington for some time.
In the hours before the long-awaited event in New York, Mr Trump sent out a series of tweets alleging the publication of the unverified allegations amounted to a "political witch-hunt" and comparing the controversy to events in Nazi Germany.
Mr Trump said that if the intelligence agencies were shown to be responsible for releasing the document, it would be a "tremendous blot" on their reputation.
Reports of the dossier - said to have been drawn up by a former British intelligence officer with extensive experience of Russia - dominated the run-up to Mr Trump's press conference, which came nine days before his inauguration as the 45th US President.
US intelligence officers briefed the Republican president-elect and President Barack Obama about the contents of the document last week and reports emerged last night on CNN. Web-based news site Buzzfeed published the dossier in full.
Mr Trump said it was a "disgrace" the way the information had been leaked.
"It is all fake news. It is phoney stuff. It didn't happen and it was gotten by opponents of ours," he said.
"It was a group of opponents who got together - sick people - and they put that crap together. Somebody released it. It shouldn't have even entered paper but it should never have even been released. I read what was released and I think it was a disgrace."
Mr Trump said he believed Russia's claim that it did not gather compromising information about him, claiming Moscow would have published whatever it held.
"President Putin and Russia put out a statement today that this fake news was indeed fake news, they said it totally never happened," the controversial tycoon said.
"Somebody would say 'oh of course he's going to say that' - I respected the fact that he said that.
"And I'll be honest - I think if he did have something they would have released it, they would have been glad to release it."
The President-elect also indicated that he thought the hacking of his defeated Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton's emails had uncovered information that was in the public interest.
"Hacking is bad and it shouldn't be done but look at the things that were hacked, look at what was learned from that hacking - that Hillary Clinton got the questions to the debate and didn't report it, that's a horrible thing, that's a horrible thing," Mr Trump said.
"Can you imagine if Donald Trump got the questions to the debate?
"It would have been the biggest story in the history of stories and they would have said immediately 'you have to get out of the race' - nobody even talked about it, that's a very terrible thing."
Mr Trump said that while he believed Russia had been involved in cyber hacking against the US "other countries and other people" had also been involved.
He said the Democratic National Committee's computer - which was hacked during the election campaign - had been "totally open to be hacked".
"They did a very poor job. They could have had hacking defence which we had," he said.
"They tried to hack the Republican National Committee and they were unable to break through. We have to do that for our country. It is very important."
"Not you!" This is the moment President-elect Trump told off a CNN journalist for being rude. pic.twitter.com/nqSlCM3s5M— BBC Newsbeat (@BBCNewsbeat) January 11, 2017
Referring to the allegations contained in the dossier, the President-elect told reporters he was a "germophobe".
"Does anyone really believe that story?" he said. "I'm also very much of a germophobe by the way, believe me."
The Republican said he when he travels outside the US, he is "extremely careful".
"I'm surrounded by bodyguards, I'm surround by people and I always tell them ... if I am leaving this country, be very careful because in your hotel rooms and no matter where you go, you are probably going to have cameras.
"I'm not referring just to Russia, but I would certainly put them in that category.
"And, number one, I hope you are going to be good anyway but in those rooms you have cameras in the strangest places, cameras that are so small with modern technology you can't see them and you won't know.
"You'd better be careful or you will be watching yourself on nightly television."
'Good relations with Russia would be an asset'
Good relations with President Putin would be an "asset" and he hopes they "get along", he said.
"If Putin likes Donald Trump I consider that an asset, not a liability because we have a horrible relationship with Russia," he said.
"Russia can help us fight Isis, which, by the way, is number one tricky.
"If you look, this administration created Isis by leaving at the wrong time."
He added: "I don't know that I'm going to get along with Vladimir Putin. I hope I do, but there's a good chance I won't.
"And, if I don't, do you honestly believe Hillary would be tougher on Putin than me? Does anybody in this room honestly believe that? Give me a break."
- Julian Assange: US intelligence report on alleged Russian hacking was a politically-motivated press release
The information was included as an annex to a classified version of the report prepared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Russian influence on the 2016 presidential election, according to CNN.
After news reports were published about the documents, President-elect Trump tweeted: "Fake news - a total political witch hunt."
FAKE NEWS - A TOTAL POLITICAL WITCH HUNT!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 11, 2017
WikiLeaks has a 100% record of accurate authentication. We do not endorse Buzzfeed's publication of a document which is clearly bogus.— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) January 11, 2017
Moscow said the dossier was a fabrication and a “total bluff.”
“The Kremlin has no compromising information on Trump. This report does not correspond to reality and is nothing but an absolute fiction,” the deputy head of the Russian presidential administration, Dmitry Peskov, told reporters on Wednesday.
Mr Peskov said the allegations could be used to keep US politicians from wanting to improve ties with Russia.
“This is a total bluff, an absolute fabrication, complete nonsense. This is an evident attempt to harm our bilateral ties. The Kremlin does not engage in collecting compromising information."
Intelligence agencies should never have allowed this fake news to "leak" into the public. One last shot at me.Are we living in Nazi Germany?— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 11, 2017
"We should treat it with humour, but there is a sad side to it, too," he said.
"There are people who are whipping up this frenzy, who are doing their best to keep this witch hunt going."
Our intelligence literally got trolled by 4chan. And the news media published it. No credibility left. #GoldenShowers— Tennessee GOP (@TEN_GOP) January 11, 2017
WikiLeaks also dismissed the report on Buzzfeed's website as 'bogus'. The whistleblowing website tweeted: "WikiLeaks has a 100% record of accurate authentication. We do not endorse Buzzfeed's publication of a document which is clearly bogus."
Dear MSM,— Julian Wan (@juliangwan) January 11, 2017
Not even 4chan takes 4chan seriously. You need an intervention.
The entire god damn planet.#GoldenShowers
Earlier this week Julian Assange denounced last week's US intelligence report on alleged Russian hacking, calling it a politically-motivated "press release" that provided no evidence.
In an online news conference (audio below), the WikiLeaks founder and editor said the report is vague and that US intelligence officials should be embarrassed by the 25-page, declassified document.
"This is a press release," he said. "It is clearly designed for political effects."
The report accuses Russia of trying to interfere with the US political process, with actions that included hacking into the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee and individual Democrats like Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta.
The report said Russia also used state-funded propaganda and paid "trolls" to make nasty comments on social media services, although there was no suggestion Russia affected the actual vote count.
This is NOT journalism, it is simply irresponsible. Please don't EVER include me in your definition of "reporter"... https://t.co/pRc5gQLnTl— Kacey Montoya (@kaceymontoya) January 11, 2017
The report, for the first time, explicitly tied Russia President Vladimir Putin to the allegations. It called Russian activities the "boldest effort yet" to influence a US election, and said the Russian government provided emails to WikiLeaks - something Mr Assange denied again on Monday.
The report said Russian intelligence agencies gave leaked DNC emails to WikiLeaks, which then released them to the public.
"As we have already stated, WikiLeaks' sources with relation to the John Podesta and DNC leaks are not state parties," Mr Assange said. "They do not come from the Russian government."
- Obama expels Russian diplomats in response to election hacking claims
- Putin rules out expelling diplomats, wishes Obama a Happy New Year and invites children of US diplomats to Kremlin party
The report lacked details about how the US learned what it says it knows, such as any intercepted conversations or electronic messages from Russian leaders, including Mr Putin, or about specific hacker techniques or digital tools the US may have traced back to Russia in its investigations.
A still-classified version of the report was shared late last week with President Barack Obama, incoming president Donald Trump, and top politicians in Congress.
In Moscow on Monday, Mr Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that the Kremlin still believes the accusations made in the report have no substance.
"They are amateurish and are hardly worthy of the high professional standards of top intelligence agencies," he said.
"We categorically rule out the possibility that Russian officials or official bodies could have been involved. We are tired of such accusations. This is beginning to remind us of a full-fledged witch-hunt."
Clinton Foundation donors Saudi Arabia and Qatar give Isis clandestine financial and logistic support, says Hillary Clinton in leaked emails
CNN severs ties with Donna Brazile after emails show debate questions given to Hillary Clinton in advance
Robert Creamer resigns after video suggests operatives staged protests and incited violence at Donald Trump rallies using paid agitators
- Podesta email leak: Journalist warns 'cycle of money issues could bring down Hillary Clinton and destroy Democratic Party'
Margarita Simonyan, the editor of the TV channel RT that is frequently mentioned in the US report, said in a weekend blog post: "Dear CIA: You get a total F for this thing you wrote.
"You don't cover the subject sufficiently, the sources are unnamed, out of date or simply incorrect, and it is written like a school homework assignment."
Editor of Defense and Foreign Affairs Gregory Copley said: "This is a highly politically motivated and a subjective report which was issued by the intelligence community. And it is not surprising that it rushed to this report whilst the Obama administration is still in office because there was no question that it was politically induced this report"
"The report does not present evidence of successful or even an attempt to actually actively manipulate the election process. The question is, did the Obama administration, did the failed candidacy of Hillary Clinton, seek to blame the Russian government for the failure of Democrats to win the election? Almost certainly!
"If the Russian government was itself trying to influence the election then it did a very poor job of doing it because Hillary Clinton won the popular vote."
WikiLeaks published more than 19,000 internal emails from the DNC, days before the Democratic convention was starting.
In one thread of correspondence from August 2014 Mrs Clinton sent an eight-point plan to John Podesta, at the time a counsellor to President Barack Obama, outlining a strategy on how to defeat terror group Isis which involved supporting Kurdish forces in Syria and Iraq with military advisers.
The Obama administration ended up taking similar action to that described as desirable by Mrs Clinton. The exchange also showed the presidential candidate identify the Gulf states of Saudi Arabia and Qatar as “clandestine” “financial and logistic” supporters of the terrorist group Isis. Both countries have donated to the Clinton Foundation.
“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL [Isis] and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Clinton reportedly wrote.
“This effort will be enhanced by the stepped up commitment in the [Kurdish Regional Government]. The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious US pressure.”
The emails also showed DNC staffers actively supporting Mrs Clinton when they were publicly promising to remain neutral during the primary elections between Mrs Clinton and her then-rival for the candidacy, Bernie Sanders.
The head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, resigned over the disclosures.
CNN also severed ties with Donna Brazile, a paid commentator and a top DNC official, after leaked emails revealed she shared debate questions with Clinton’s campaign.
Mr Trump said at the time that blaming Russia was deflecting attention from the embarrassing material contained in the emails - although he had previously challenged Russia to "find the 30,000 emails that are missing" from Mrs Clinton's private server.
In an interview with Sean Hannity last week, Mr Assange said: "Our publications had wide uptake by the American people, they're all true. But that's not the allegation that's being presented by the Obama White House.
"So, why such a dramatic response? Well, the reason is obvious. They're trying to delegitimise the Trump administration as it goes into the White House.
"They are trying to say that President-elect Trump is not a legitimate president."
Mr Assange denied the information from the emails was obtained by Russia.
He said: " Our source is not a state party, so the answer for our interactions is no.
"But if we look at our most recent statement from the US government, which is on December 29, OK, we had five different branches of government, Treasury, DHS, FBI, White House, presenting their accusations to underpin Obama's throwing out 29 Russian diplomats.
"What was missing from all of those statements? The word WikiLeaks. It's very strange."
Asked if he thought WikiLeaks had changed the course of the US election, Mr Assange told Fox News channel: " Who knows? It's impossible to tell.
"But if it did, the accusation is that the true statements of Hillary Clinton and her campaign manager, John Podesta, and the DNC head Debbie Wasserman Schultz, their true statements is what changed the election."
Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, has already dismissed the CIA's claims that Russia was the source of the emails as "bulls***".
The accounts by Murray also contradict the story advanced by the CIA.
Mr Murray said: "I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it's an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.
“If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIA’s statement refers to people who are known to be linked to the Russian state, they would have arrested someone if it was someone inside the United States.
“America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and it’s not been shy about extraditing hackers. They plainly have no knowledge whatsoever.”
Mr Trump's inauguration as US President is due to take place on January 20.
Belfast Telegraph Digital