Qantas chief denies holed jumbo was a 'rust bucket'
Monday, 28 July 2008

AP
Qantas pilot Capt. John Francis Bartels look at the right wing damaged fuselage of Qantas Airways Boeing 747-400 after it made an emergency landing
A Qantas jumbo jet forced to make an emergency landing in Manila with a "van-sized" hole in the fuselage had serious corrosion, it was claimed yesterday.
Entries on an online aviation forum going back to February revealed that rust had been found during a refurbishment of the 17-year-old aircraft. One of the posts spoke of "serious corrosion issues" that had delayed its launch date back into service.
"Let's keep our fingers crossed and hope OJK [the aircraft's identification] recovers from her plastic surgery," the forum writer added.
The allegations, which emerged as passengers from the 747-400 arrived in Melbourne yesterday, threatened further damage to the image of Australia's national airline, which is in the midst of a public relations disaster as film and photographs of the mid-air drama and the gaping fuselage circulate around the world.
Australian newspapers described the stricken jumbo as a "rust bucket", a claim vehemently denied by Qantas's chief executive, Geoff Dixon, who said reports of corrosion contributing to the incident should be discounted.
Mr Dixon said corrosion commonly occurred in some parts of all planes, but he insisted there was no evidence of it at the site of the hole in the fuselage.
Australia's Civil Aviation Safety Authority last night supported him. "Speculation in some quarters of corrosion found in the aircraft earlier this year can in no way be related to this accident," said its spokesman, Peter Gibson.
Australian investigators arrived in Manila yesterday to inspect the plane, which was left with a hole measuring about 6ft by 12ft in its fuselage, close to the wing.
The cause of the rupture is still unknown, although metal fatigue or an internal explosion caused by a pressurised container in a passenger's baggage have both been put forward as possible theories.
Relieved passengers arriving in Melbourne spoke of hearing a loud bang, which was followed by a gust of wind through the cabin and oxygen masks dropping from the ceiling.
One woman said part of the plane's flooring gave way, exposing the cargo area. As the plane lost altitude, passengers feared the worst.
David Saunders, of Melbourne, thought he was going to die. "The plane just started to dive, and I thought we were going down into the sea," he said. "I just grabbed my passport out of my bag and put it in my pocket, so that if my body was found they could identify it quicker."
Australian newspapers commended Captain John Bartels and his crew for saving the lives of more than 300 passengers. Qantas, which has never lost an aircraft, has one of the best safety records of any airline, but there have been serious incidents in recent years, including a mains power failure that forced a Qantas 747 to make an emergency landing in Bangkok in January. Recent cost-cutting in the quest for greater efficiency and higher profits has also led to questions about the impact on safety.
- Text Size
Also in this section
- Egypt candidates woo middle ground
- Clinton: End Assad 'rule of murder'
- Rebel groups agree on Islamic state
- Another Eurovision disaster for UK
- Second body found in Indian river

Photosales
niJobfinder
niCarfinder
Home Delivery
Propertynews


















Don't Know why all this fuss over names etc - 365 people on board that plane - could have been a high fatality rate - Thankfully no-one was hurt - the Crew handled the situation very professionally and got everyone off that craft safe.
Posted by Dee | 26.07.08, 11:06 GMT
Longreach is the name of the town in Queensland where Qantas originated.
Posted by Annabella | 26.07.08, 07:29 GMT
"Longreach" is not the name of the aircraft. Many QANTAS aircraft feature the word "Longreach" on the fuselage.
Posted by Steve | 26.07.08, 04:35 GMT
To Bronson - all QF 747-400 series planes are inscribed "Longreach" to show the huge distances they travel non stop.
Especially LAX-SYD 14.5 hours non stop; LAX-MEL 15.5 hours non stop.
Thank goodness the accident did not happen on one of these trans Pacific flights where the nearest airport is water, but by all accounts, the flight crew had everything well under control.
However if five or six hours on trans Pacific to nearest airport. more of the plane of course may have disintegrated under the strain.
Posted by John Phillips, Sydney | 26.07.08, 02:04 GMT
Centaur...mr smarty-pants - "spirit of australia" is the Qantas catchphrase/slogan NOT the name of the plane!
Posted by Smarterpants | 25.07.08, 15:37 GMT
Bronson, I am looking at a photograph of the aircraft (complete with hole forward of the starboard wing) and there are big letters on the side of the hull. Let me look closer..... ah yes, "Spirit of Australia"! What are you talking about? This aircraft is NOT called "Longreach".
Also, I would like to join with "Patterson, Frankfurt" in condemning the over sensational style of journalism used in this report. The aircraft followed procedure in taking the passengers and crew to an altitude where there was air to breath.
It is highly unlikely that it "dropped 20,000 feet". This implies loss of control and, by all accounts, the incident was professionally handled by the crew. I would congratulate them.
Posted by Centaur | 25.07.08, 15:33 GMT
*the plane dropped 20,000 feet* Its SOP to reduce your FL (asap)after the cabin pressure is lost. I´m sure the mentioned "Drop" was however controlled.
Come on guys lets not get too sensational in journalism terms....
Posted by Patterson, Frankfurt | 25.07.08, 14:04 GMT
Query??? Name of Qantas jet that carried Pope Benedict home from Sydney was "Longreach"... (see vision of Channel 9 )
Name of plane with hole.... "Longreach".
Qantas claim it was not the same plane.
Even if it was, does it matter?
Posted by Bronson | 25.07.08, 11:53 GMT