Belfast Telegraph

UK Website Of The Year

Home News World

Still no deal in Iran nuclear talks

Iran nuclear talks ran through their second deadline in a week today, raising new questions about the ability of world powers to cut off all Iranian pathways to a bomb through diplomacy.

The talks, already in their 12th day, were prolonged until possibly Friday.

"We knew it would have been difficult, challenging, and sometimes hard," said Federica Mogherini, the European Union's foreign policy chief.

She said the negotiations would continue despite hitting some "tense" moments, and the US state department declared the current interim nuclear arrangement with Iran extended through until July 10.

As the latest target date arrived for a deal setting a decade of restrictions on Iran's nuclear programme, US secretary of state John Kerry, Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and other top diplomats huddled in Vienna in search of a breakthrough.

All had spoken of deep differences remaining, and there was no public indication they had resolved disputes ranging from inspection rules on suspicious Iranian sites to limits on Tehran's research and development of advanced nuclear technology. Still, no one was speaking yet on Tuesday of a long-term extension.

"The last difficult political issues we have to solve," Ms Mogherini said.

And as he left the talks for an economic summit at home, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said fewer than 10 major differences needed to be ironed out, including access to Iranian sites for international monitors. He said questions related to the easing of sanctions on Iran had been decided, Russian news agency RIA Novosti reported. Mr Lavrov said he could return to the talks later in the week.

Diplomats had extended their discussions by a week when they missed their goal of a pact by June 30, after passing previous deadlines in July 2014 and last November. For Mr Kerry and his team, pressure is increasing from sceptical US allies and members of Congress. If the accord is not sent over to American politicians by Thursday, their month-long review period would be doubled to 60 days, hampering the ability of the Obama administration to offer speedy economic benefits to Iran for nuclear concessions.

In Tehran, Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation declared it had reached a "general understanding" in parallel talks with the UN nuclear agency on "joint co-operation". The Iranians have made similar claims previously, and it was unclear if any process was established for the International Atomic Energy Agency's long-stymied investigation of past nuclear weapons work by the Islamic Republic - a demand of Washington and its partners in negotiations in Austria's capital.

There, in a baroque 19th-century palace, Mr Kerry gathered early today with the foreign ministers of Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia. The larger group was to meet with Mr Zarif at some point later in the day. Russia's Mr Lavrov and China's Wang Yi had to leave for a gathering of emerging economies in the Russian city of Ufa starting tomorrow, and the EU's Ms Mogherini said different ministers were likely to depart and return.

"We are taking these negotiations day to day to see if we can conclude a comprehensive agreement," state department spokeswoman Marie Harf said in a statement, adding that Mr Kerry would remain in Vienna.

"We've made substantial progress in every area, but this work is highly technical and high stakes for all of the countries involved," Ms Harf said. "We're frankly more concerned about the quality of the deal than we are about the clock, though we also know that difficult decisions won't get any easier with time. That is why we are continuing to negotiate."

The US is in a tough spot. President Barack Obama has expended significant political capital on finalising an agreement that has prompted suspicion from Iran's regional rival, Saudi Arabia, outright hostility from America's closest Middle East ally, Israel, and deep ambivalence even among Mr Obama's Democratic allies in Congress. They are concerned that the accord would leave Iran's nuclear infrastructure largely intact and compel the West to provide the leading US-designated state sponsor of terrorism with potentially hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of economic relief from international sanctions.

To ease their concerns, Mr Obama and Mr Kerry have vowed to hold out for a "good deal" that verifiably keeps Iran at least a year away from a nuclear weapons capability for at least a decade. Current intelligence estimates put the Iranians only two to three months away from amassing enough material for a nuclear warhead, if they pursued such a course. As part of the guarantee, the administration has repeatedly threatened to abandon negotiations if they prove fruitless or appear as an Iranian stall for time.

On-and-off talks with Tehran have been going on for more than a decade, though this incarnation has come closest to any resolution. The latest effort began in secret a couple of years ago and gained speed after the election of moderate-leaning Iranian president Hassan Rouhani in 2013. By November that year, Iran and the six world powers clinched an interim nuclear agreement and began the process for a comprehensive accord.

Over the weekend, a cautious Mr Kerry told reporters that talks on the final package "could go either way".

Republicans hostile to compromise with Iran have been urging the US to pull back from the talks. Their refrain has been that Mr Obama and Mr Kerry want a deal more than the Iranians do, and have let red lines erode on Iranian enrichment capacity, inspections and providing limited sanctions relief. The president and his top advisers vehemently reject such claims.

Iran has its own red lines, defiantly outlined in recent weeks by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the nation's supreme leader. They include a quick easing of sanctions, and rejection of any inspections of military sites or interviews with Iranian nuclear scientists.

Your Comments

COMMENT RULES: Comments that are judged to be defamatory, abusive or in bad taste are not acceptable and contributors who consistently fall below certain criteria will be permanently blacklisted. The moderator will not enter into debate with individual contributors and the moderator’s decision is final. It is Belfast Telegraph policy to close comments on court cases, tribunals and active legal investigations. We may also close comments on articles which are being targeted for abuse. Problems with commenting?


From Belfast Telegraph