UN's Ban Ki-moon warns 'punishing' Syria with military strike would be illegal
Any "punitive" action against Syria for the alleged chemical weapons attack would be illegal without Security Council support or a sound case for self-defence, UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon has warned.
The US and France have blamed Syrian president Bashar Assad's regime for the alleged attack and are considering military action in response.
Such a strike would almost certainly occur without the approval of the UN Security Council, where Russia and China have consistently used their veto power to block action against Assad's regime.
The Obama administration in the US argues that a chemical weapons attack cannot go unpunished because of the council's inaction.
Mr Ban said: "As I have repeatedly said, the Security Council has primary responsibility for international peace and security. The use of force is lawful only when in exercise of self-defence in accordance with article 51 of the United Nations Charter and or when the Security Council approves such action."
He also warned that a military strike against Syria could unleash more turmoil and bloodshed in a crisis that has already killed more than 100,000 people.
He said: "I take note of the argument for action to prevent a future use of chemical weapons. At the same time, we must consider the impact of any punitive measure on efforts to prevent further bloodshed and facilitate the political resolution of the conflict."
Mr Ban did not blame any party for the alleged attack on a Damascus suburb, saying that "if confirmed, any use of chemical weapons by anyone under any circumstances will be a serious violation of international law and an outrageous war crime".
"Whatever the source, this latest allegation should be a wake-up call for the international community," he said.
He stressed that an investigation by UN chemical weapons experts "is uniquely placed to independently establish the facts in an objective and impartial manner".
President Barack Obama has received key support from leaders in the US Congress for a potential strike.
The US government has said it has "high confidence" that there was a gas attack and it was launched by the Syrian government.
US officials have also questioned the ability of the UN team to investigate properly, saying the inspectors faced too many delays getting on the ground and have a mandate only to determine whether chemical weapons were used in the attack - not who was responsible.
Mr Ban said biological samples collected by the inspectors will arrive in European labs for testing by tomorrow.
US secretary of state John Kerry said the debate about military strikes against Syria is not about Mr Obama's "red line" that weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated.
Instead, Mr Kerry told Congress, "this debate is about the world's red line". He said it is "a red line that anyone with a conscience ought to draw".
Mr Kerry, defence secretary Chuck Hagel, and joint chiefs chairman General Martin Dempsey were dispatched to the Senate to help persuade politicians to support a resolution authorising limited military strikes.
Mr Kerry said "This is not the time for armchair isolationism. This is not the time to be spectators to slaughter."
Mr Hagel said several key allies in the region strongly support US military action.
He told the Senate foreign relations committee that France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and others in the region are key partners in any US action.
He said US forces were ready to act whenever Mr Obama gives the order.
Mr Kerry said the standing of the US among allies in the region would be eroded if America shows it is unwilling to act.
Belfast Telegraph Digital