Why the Pope shouldn't count on being welcomed with open arms
Tuesday, 27 October 2009
You can call them Anglo-Catholics, or 'traditionalists', or just conservatives, but for high churchmen in the Church of England the door leading to Rome has long been ajar.
Now, in a daring stroke of ecclesiastical gamesmanship, Pope Benedict has pushed it open a little further — in fact wide enough for a beckoning finger to be pushed through.
Gamesmanship used to be defined as the art of winning without actually cheating. Shades of the worldly Archdeacon Grantly and Bishop Proudie!
Trollope would have loved this: the undercover negotiations about setting up a church within a church for the Anglican rebels who do not like women priests and homosexual bishops; allowing them to keep their Anglican services, but granting them full communion with Rome.
But the most scandalous feature was the secrecy, the Archbishop of Canterbury knowing no details of the plan until 48 hours before the embarrassing media briefing he was invited to attend. Ditto, the discomfited English Catholic bishops.
No wonder there have been headlines about the ‘end' of the Anglican Communion and dark mutterings about a bid to park Roman tanks on the Anglican lawn!
The reality may be somewhat less exciting. But the deep split among churchmen and women is no figment.
The Anglo-Catholic interest in the Church of Ireland is relatively tiny: there are one or two outposts in suburban Dublin.
But the theological split is already very real.
There is a pressure group, the Evangelical Fellowship of Irish Clergy, which has been leaning on the bishops to come off the fence on homosexuality and women bishops — a fence upon which they have been uncomfortably perched since their carefully-worded pastoral letter six years ago.
The fellowship speaks for up to 100 clergy in the Church of Ireland, most of them said to be young theological conservatives.
There have been dark murmurings among them about the need for a second Reformation.
In spite of the bishops' bid to maintain a united front, their cautious and non-committal pronouncements (“The Church is in a period of active listening on the issue of human sexuality . .”) reflect their impossible position.
The Bishop of Down, Harold Miller, went to the Lambeth Conference of Anglican bishops last year with strong reservations about sharing Communion with the Americans who had consecrated the new Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire.
He is the much-publicised Gene Robinson, who had abandoned wife and children to adopt a homosexual lifestyle.
Meantime the evangelicals have been exhorted (by their visiting kindred spirit, the Anglican Archbishop of Sydney, Peter Jensen) to be vigilant that no “official act which endorses sin” takes place within the Church of Ireland.
Keeping the Anglican show on the road is not impossible. It has always embraced extreme of churchmanship. It has existed on the basis of compromise for centuries.
But strong leadership will be required. It concerns some Anglicans that the Primate, Archbishop Williams, does not appear minded to provide it.
Like many intellectuals, he is strong on ideas, but weak in the political arts essential to |promote them.
He was reputed to be on good terms with Pope Benedict; both are theologians. They have known each other for years.
How then has the Archbishop been excluded from all knowledge and planning of an initiative which affects him intimately and which began — in extreme secrecy — in 2006?
How far was it advanced in July last year when Benedict, on a tour of Australia, went out of his way to warn off Anglicanism's disaffected Anglo-Catholics?
Far from holding the door open to the malcontents then, he told them to sort themselves out and make peace with their fellows, male and female. To back this up, he dispatched no fewer than three cardinals to that month's Lambeth Conference of Anglican bishops at the University of Kent to convey his message.
As things stand now, the Pope faces a charge that he has not only betrayed, but insulted the Archbishop. Scarcely the best curtain-raiser for the coming papal visit to the UK.
For the Church of England and the Church of Ireland, the challenge in all this is to recapture the centre ground, where the champions of the rival certainties — Catholic and evangelical — could exist in separate tolerance at the extreme, as they have done for centuries, but where the large mass in the middle, nervous of |polarised dogma, could still feel |at home.
When someone like Terry Waite, once on the Archbishop's staff at Lambeth Palace, admits that he now attends Quaker meetings and, from time to time, the Russian Orthodox Cathedral in London, because the happy-clappy ambience and off-the-cuff |liturgy of too many Anglican churches does not appeal, there is a problem.
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.



























Evergreen.
The Catholic Church was founded by Emperor Constantine after the Council of Nicea. The Reformers taught it is the Anti Christ of Scripture, ie a false alterntaive to the truth ... the life changing power CHRIST. Your empty dead religious comments show your ignorance of the truth.
Posted by brian | 12.11.09, 01:17 GMT
The church went out from Jerusalem so the Book of Acts tells me, as for the so called Petrine Ministry how come it's advocates are petrified to search the scriptures to make thee wise unto salvation? Clearly there are distinctive self governing churches hence various books in the New Testament, such as: Ephessian; Corinthian etc. In fact there is historical precedent for Holy Spirit led independent churches including the present day Anglican Communion. Just think of the Celtic Churches in Ireland, including those who evangelised the Saxon Northumbrian Church, such as St. Columba, in Iona. The 39 Articles of Religion emphasis separate Churches. The Saxon Church founded churches in Sweden and Iceland, so the Gospel is spread around the World. The Lord uses people to carry out his will, look at the Church of Ireland missions to the Spanish Reformed Church.
Posted by Frank Adam | 30.10.09, 16:57 GMT
Andy,
"Can someone actually give a reasonable argument as to why women can't be priests"? Yes, very simply, because men say they cannot be. That appears to be the only argument that I can find.
The very issue of ordaining women shows exactly why religion, in all its forms, is complete and utter nonsense. Religious women, not all but certainly a majority, appear to see absolutely nothing wrong with this overt misogyny. They appear contented and happy to be regarded as second class members of society and of the church, it is indicative of the power of religion. This outrage is not only confined to the Christian faith.
Throughout the bible women are regarded as the property of men, there are even instructions on how to sell your daughter as a slave. Therefore, is it any wonder that this issue is causing so much division? Women need to realise the true reason for the existence of religion, it gives power to men all over the world. It's high time for a new enlightenment.
Posted by WH | 28.10.09, 15:33 GMT
Can someone actually give a reasonable argument as to why women can't be priests?
Posted by Andy | 28.10.09, 13:19 GMT
Okay, I'll take the bait this time. After all someone has to keep this writer in his job however poisoned he may be. Unfortunately for him I think it likely that he actually believes his "reasoning"
The Pope is head of the 2,000 years old cohesive Catholic Church which well over a billion people identify with globally. Faults and all, it was founded by one Jesus Christ.
If Eric Waugh or anyone else seriously believes that the Pope is going to loose any sleep or time over the goings on of a small splinter group set up in dubious circumstances by a despot (old 'enry) for money and political power, he needs to get out more in the real world. Pathetic.
Posted by Evergreen | 28.10.09, 07:18 GMT
Mr. Waugh
Compared to the fascistic inclinations of the UN's draft Copenhagen Treaty to be presented for approval in December, the Pope's unification skulduggery is much ado about nothing.
Please read the draft & offer us your worldly experienced opinion.
Posted by jock | 28.10.09, 06:33 GMT
Jesus founded His Church on the rock of Peter, not Henry VIII. Sorry if that is offensive to some, but facts are no respecter of persons. It Pope Benedict failed to consult with Lambeth Palace or his own bishops, it should come as no surprise to those who understand that the Church is not a political organization. The successor of Peter is fully competent to exercise the office of Universal Vicar with the Holy Spirit as his sole confidant.
Posted by Jude Gentile | 28.10.09, 02:37 GMT
The demise of the Anglican Church maybe premature - however, Anglican prelates should be aware that the time to decide if women and gays are part of its Catholic ethos. The genie is out-of-the-bottle and its time to Come Home to Rome.
Posted by Seamus O'hEarcain | 27.10.09, 23:28 GMT
Erics Waughs opinion is over exaggerated, very simple
answers are the requirement ,if you as an anglican
are unhappy with the changes with in your church ,if you beleive god is unhappy too,walk away .
Is the pope holding out a hand for the way of the lord does gods teaching find the changes with in the anglican
church acceptable,these are the questions,
as an anglican talk to god and go the way of the lord
Posted by philip murphy | 27.10.09, 21:57 GMT