Gail Walker: Why we should leave our history firmly in the past
Tuesday, 18 August 2009
It’s about time we drew a line under the cult of anniversaries related to the Troubles. Did we not have enough of it first time round?
This year is the 40th anniversary of 1969, and I’ve already had a bellyful of it. It’s not as if We Heart 1969.
Everyone else gets the moon landing and Woodstock.
We get men in flat caps chased down a road by soldiers who look like they’ve just stepped off the beaches at Normandy.
It’s just how 2006 was the 40th anniversary of 1966 and the Malvern Street murder.
And next year will be 40 years from... fill in your own atrocity.
It’s as if we just can’t get used to it all being over.
Or we’re playing out extra time on old griefs, still trying to win the points. Or we can’t believe it happened in the first place.
Whichever it is, it’s certainly true, when you look at the old photos and TV footage of rubble-strewn streets, burnt buildings, bodies half-covered with coats that we all come out of it looking grubby and barbaric.
Yes, remember the dead — it’s all we can do since nobody is in prison for killing them — but there’s a danger of making our Troubles into a kind of fetish, something we were addicted to and which we now — wrongly, I think — feel safe about revisiting endlessly, blow by savage blow.
Or at least those blows which show our divided community — whichever one we consider ourselves to belong to — in the best light, usually that of ‘victim’.
You see, our ‘communities’ like to portray themselves only as ‘victims’ in the plural; the perpetrators, on the the other hand — our ‘terrorists’, our ‘security forces’, our ‘loyalist death squads’, our ‘freedom fighters’, our ‘defenders’ — are the rogue elements we sometimes like to ‘understand’ and only rarely completely disown.
But it’s the ‘unionist community’, the ‘nationalist people’, ‘the Catholics’, |‘the Protestants’ who have violence done to them. Victimhood implicates us all, one way |or another.
As communities and people, though, we remain coyly distant from the detonators which destroyed the lives of ‘the other side’ and often of ‘our own’ |as well.
None of that is ‘our’ fault.
We live in a world of quote marks around the simplest of words. Why? Because this is a society still riven and violent.
Every single atrocity — whether the death of one person, (rarely granted the honour of a full-page spread) or the deaths of dozens — remains unfinished business.
Just interview the relatives of the dead. Talk to those who only knew them, or those whose |businesses were blown up or homes torched.
For them, it’s not over yet. And it won’t be for a very long time.
It’s still ‘live’. It’s still ‘the news’. It will be till they die.
While it’s rather quaint |that it can become a special |supplement like a ‘Back to School’ pull-out, there’s still too |much hurt, anger and violence bubbling under to pretend that it’s some kind of history lesson.
Especially when the way the history is presented is often itself inflammatory and selective in the extreme.
With the past, we just can’t help ourselves being bigots.
Protestants burnt out, Catholics burnt out. You know well where to read the version you want.
Personally, I don’t want to remember having to sit in the car when my mum went shopping so it wouldn’t be an ‘unattended vehicle’, being searched, TV warnings to keyholders about incendiary devices or being the first reporter on the scene.
Many others won’t want to recall more vicious interventions in what should have been a normal life.
And it should have been a normal life. Instead, it was brutal and fear-driven. It poisoned the name of ‘Ireland’ across the globe. It made heroes out of killers. Why? For an expense account at the Assembly?
Maybe that’s another argument. But there’s a hard-core still grumbling, plotting, intent on pursuing fantasies for which they wish the rest of us to pay with our lives.
When it’s 100 years since 1969 or 1966 or 1972, someone may be interested in the historical context and throw light on a curious time when (hard to believe now!) we all hated each other’s guts for no good reason.
Until then, though, I’d just leave it alone thanks.
Let’s see if we can even make it as an island to the hundredth anniversary of 1916 without the whole damn thing blowing up in our faces again.
That would be a feat we might want to read about.
- Text Size

Photosales
niJobfinder
niCarfinder
Home Delivery
Propertynews

















Yes Gail we should forget the past. The 1690 Battle of the Boyne and the Easter Rising in 1916 should be the first to be forgotten about as they mean nothing to anyone growing up in Northern Ireland really as they where both fought in a Country that we all have no control over, as we are not allowed to vote there. There is and always will be one war that we should all be celebrating the ultimate sacrifice made by Men on both sides of the sectarian/religious/political divide and that war is the First World War.
Posted by Michael Falkes | 25.08.09, 18:01 GMT
Thank you for putting to rest the oft repeated and senseless idea that we should "know our history". Right now we should focus on knowing what will allow us to survive this economy... and note history will not pay the mortgage.
Posted by lanelle | 22.08.09, 01:09 GMT
I think there is something to what you are saying Gail. This same time period there was unrest and criminations and assaults even sometimes rioting between blacks and whites in the American public school district I attended. Nothing like what NI went through then of course, but still when I recall the vitriol that was evident when things boiled over for this or that reason; I sure as hell wouldnt want to commemorate any of that!!!!!!
Posted by Chris M | 21.08.09, 21:06 GMT
"It's as if we just can't get used to it all being over" Gail - almost every week you dig up the past in an attempt to have a dig at republicans. What on earth are you talking about? "It's not as if We Heart 1969." Excuse me? At least try to write like an adult.
Posted by Ben | 21.08.09, 09:06 GMT
'We must remember our past so that we do not repeat it'
Posted by Who said that? | 21.08.09, 08:24 GMT
It's true! Gail Walker actually wrote this! I thought I had dreamt the whole thing!
Posted by Will Hawkes | 19.08.09, 13:22 GMT
yet another trashy blog...
Posted by Sol | 18.08.09, 15:34 GMT
Gail now seems to taken the moral high ground and began to spout rhetoric about how we should forget and leave it alone. Strange line you have taken considering the amount of divisive comments she has printed recently.
I cannot take Miss. Walker seriosly. Her journalistic skills are next to nothing. Did she get her qualifications free inside a cracker?
Posted by Tristan | 18.08.09, 14:53 GMT
Gail, I agree largely with your comments, well argued. But I do feel that such momentous dates in history need to be recalled and honoured as part of the healing process and any moves we, as humans, might hope for, for a better and more tolerant world./ Otheriwse history, as it so often does, is doomed to repeat itself
MUKIWA
Posted by Mukiwa | 18.08.09, 14:43 GMT
Gail,
You never shut up about terrorists and the like in your columns and now you want everyone else to forget about it? You should be a sketch writer, you are wasted as a columnist.
Posted by Will Hawkes | 18.08.09, 13:35 GMT
Leave history in the past? Ahaha. This is from Gail Walker? How funny. This is columnist who drags the past up even when there is no relevance to the article - just to have a go at republicans. Oh and your column last week about Sammy Wilson was disgraceful as usual. Right at the end you threw in a line about those from the republican tradition. Trying your best to insult people. Just can't help it can you? As they say in Belfast - catch yourself on.
Posted by T Radcliffe | 18.08.09, 10:54 GMT
I agree Lindy, although if we're all chuckling about our awful fashion sense in 1970, maybe that's progress.
Personally, I think it would be great if we stopped marking the anniversary of the 1916 Easter Rising or the 1690 Battle of the Boyne, the Siege of Derry etc etc. Where do I sign up ?
Posted by Yip | 18.08.09, 10:39 GMT
The cult of victimhood allows many here to excuse their own sides past and in some cases ongoing appalling behaviour.
Too many people have too many vested interests in keeping us remembering the past, and to a certain extent in fear. In a happy, confident and forward looking Northern ireland how many people are really going to vote for the likes of SF and the DUP? They arent stupid and realised this a long time ago.
Posted by bigchiefally | 18.08.09, 10:28 GMT