GET THE BELFAST TELEGRAPH NEWSPAPER DELIVERED TO YOUR DOOR EVERY DAY

Belfast Telegraph

  • nijobfinder
  • nicarfinder
  • propertynews.com
  • Classified

Why are the old mums so disliked, but not old dads?

By Gail Walker
Tuesday, 19 May 2009

Well, 66-year-old mum-to-be Elizabeth Adeney’s decision to have a child has certainly caused a storm.

For days the Press have been teetering on the edge of complaining about her decision without having the nerve to go for broke. They’ve portrayed Adeney as a lonely, albeit successful, businesswoman who obviously had the IVF treatment in the Ukraine for all the wrong reasons. She is a ‘desperate divorcee' whose ‘sad, solitary existence’ somehow casts her beyond the limits of justified motherhood.

What on earth could they be driving at? Nudge, nudge.

They even managed to track down her husband from 20-odd years previously for a few less than flattering comments.

Even the wishy-washy Church of England has gotten in on the act, too: “A child is a gift not a right. For those who have never received that gift we can well understand their desire to have children but it is always important to think in those circumstances about what is really in the child's best interests.”

(Like not existing at all, presumably ...).

But is that the measure we use for other pregnancies? Er, no. Some pregnancies are planned but many aren't. Some are used to prop up a failing marriage. Some are used to move a relationship on. Some are the result of Saturday night carelessness and one glass of wine too many. Some because it's just what people do, isn't it?

But all that's ok because, well, we're talking about real people. You know, people in their 20s to around the 50 mark. Not wrinklies, though, because that just disgusting.

Elizabeth Adeney, at an admittedly casual glance, looks in good nick to me and could easily pass for much younger than her years. She's in a secure position financially to make sure that the child gets the very best materially (yes, I know that's not the be all and end all but it is a factor). And she obviously wants the child. All pluses, you’d think.

She's probably in better health than some of the casualties you see prowling up and down our main thoroughfares, offspring in tow. They may be in their 20s, but florid of face, puffing fags and, well, obese, there's a good chance they'll be handing on to their little darlings a health/psychological timebomb at least the equal of anything the Suffolk businesswoman might do. Often they’re bringing up their kids in a bleak existence on income support. At least, Adeney can pay to raise her own child.

But you don't — quite rightly, may I add — see those younger mums dragooned for wanting/having kids.

The only negative the critics can really think of as regards Adeney is the shadow of the Grim Reaper. There’s a reasonable chance that she may not see the baby grow up to be a teenager.

But what's perfect in life? To quote the man, stuff happens. Tragically plenty of young parents die young. And consequently lots of elderly people through circumstances beyond their control end up raising children as their own — or at least taking the primary share of the child-rearing responsibilities.

Grandparents have to step in and provide the love and support a child needs and no one bats an eyelid. So really it's the actual pregnancy that seems to give some the heebie-jeebies.

Why? Because it's ‘not natural'. Well, tons of things are ‘NN' — IVF for a start, whatever the age of the parents. Artificial kneecaps. Liver transplants. Face transplants. Electricity. Viagra. Need I go on? If we were to live entirely in line with ‘what's natural', Belfast would resemble Amish country with horse-drawn buggies clip-clopping along Royal Avenue. Also, if Adeney had been a 66-year-old man, it would have been cigars all round and to hell with the actuary tables. Life in the old dog yet and so on. There’d be no debates about children suffering psychological trauma there, I'll bet. Instead, we’d say that while he mightn’t be able to kick a ball with the nipper, he can give him the benefit of his great wisdom. But that's another story.

No, of course, Elizabeth Adeney’s pregnancy is not ideal, but the reaction surrounding her eight-month bump has shown up some of our deepest prejudices.

And what sort of society is that to raise a child in?

Post a comment

Limit: 500 characters

View all comments that have been posted about this article

Comment
Your details

* Required field

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.

Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.

I would love to pretend I'm a doctor. Would you like to me to practice on you? It's not ideal, and things might go wrong, but I'll give it the "good ol' college try." : )

Truthfully I don't want to judge anyone, but just because you can do it, doesn't mean it's necessarily right, and that would pertain to a lot of the things we do in life.

My suggestion is that you worry about what you are doing, and do what you feel is best for you.

Posted by The Judge | 17.06.09, 17:10 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Certainly Elizabeth's pregnancy is not ideal; but... who dares to judge her? Who knows the circumstances of her life.? She is lonely in this IMPERFECT world. Because, yes, this world is far, too far.... from perfect. Besides that, she is doing it in good faith. I am pretty sure she will give her child ALL the LOVE, WISDOM and MATERIAL FORTUNE that she has amassed throughout all these years. NOBODY knows what the future holds. Even young mothers die unexpectedly because of accidents, illness....

Posted by Carmen | 19.05.09, 22:58 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

To have an opinion is not necessarily a predudice, Gail. It is often a matter of common sense and to have a child at 66 is not common sense as it's more probable that the parent could die within a very short time. That is common sense as the older we become, the more disease we are prone to. So who will look after the child at death? I suppose it will be the state or more aptly the tax payer and many of us are tired paying too much tax for the irresponsible in our 'want', and not need, society.

Posted by robbo | 19.05.09, 21:05 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Have you thought that maybe the source of the critics worries is not because of her actual age but the statistics regarding disorders such as down syndrome in children from older females. As a woman ages, the chance of such disorders occurring increases in alarming numbers. Has it occurred to you that these kinds of statistic are what fuel the critics fire and not prejudice? Maybe, maybe not. But if you did, you didn't supply your readers with the information. Disgusting.

Posted by LRob | 19.05.09, 14:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

What a stunning commentary and absolutely a perfect analysis of what the actual furor is all about. She is an "old woman" and old women are gross. Only a young woman is beautiful enought to be pregant. you never see the fat cigarette puffing trailer trailer trash on the cover of working woman Now Magazine!
I am 44 and I plan on having more children when I meet Mr. Grown Up. I may not meet him until I am in my sixties so critics beware. My parents died when I was 23 and they never did grow up.

Posted by Sunshine23 | 19.05.09, 13:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Define 'natural'...100 years ago it was not 'natural' for people to live beyond the age of 50, now people are living beyond 110 even and this will extend with time. Some women DO continue to be fertile into their late 50's and even early 60's - fertility treatment just allows those who are not some equality with those women. Is it natural for elderly men to maintain erectile function - no - that is why we have viagra...but that is okay??? 'unnatural' today will be second nature in the future.

Posted by Wendy | 19.05.09, 12:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Columnist Comments

gail_walker

Why we’ve had enough of all the party games

By the time you read this, the chances are that Peter and Martin will have announced ‘Peace In Our Time'.

Columnist Comments

lindy_mcdowell

The UUP’S spin doctor is right to spurn new pact

His may not exactly be a household name. But in unionist politics (small u — and large) Alex Kane has long been a central figure.

Columnist Comments

laurence_white

Why the deal isn’t the final piece of devolution jigsaw

The agreement on the devolution of policing and justice is probably the biggest con since snake oil vendors were in their pomp.

Columnist Comments

robert_mcneill

Why life in the wild isn’t really Garden of Eden

Animals, eh?.... What are they about? We can't live with the big, fierce ones, and we can't live without the little, cuddly ones.

Columnist Comments

eamon_mccann

Take a cue from amazing Grace and slap the cuffs on Tony Blair

What a joy it is in these dour times to be able to exalt the name of Grace McCann. No relation, unfortunately.

Columnist Comments

robert_fisk

Robert Fisk: Israel can no longer ignore existence of first Holocaust

While Israelis commemorated the second Holocaust of the 20th century this week, I was reading the records of the victims of the century's first Holocaust.

Columnist Comments

the_punter

Rafa still has a way to go in sack race

Rafa Benitez is taking a lot of flak and there is no let-up in demands for his sacking at Liverpool.

Columnist Comments

hamish_mcrae

Cost of pay freezes and high taxes was a culture of duplicity, envy and hypocrisy

The Chancellor was right yesterday to dismiss the idea of a High Pay Commission. His phraseology was characteristically mild: he was "not persuaded" of his merits.

TeleToons

TeleToons by Stevie Lee

 

Click here for audio version