GET THE BELFAST TELEGRAPH NEWSPAPER DELIVERED TO YOUR DOOR EVERY DAY

Belfast Telegraph

  • nijobfinder
  • nicarfinder
  • propertynews.com
  • Classified

Why are the old mums so disliked, but not old dads?

By Gail Walker
Tuesday, 19 May 2009

Well, 66-year-old mum-to-be Elizabeth Adeney’s decision to have a child has certainly caused a storm.

For days the Press have been teetering on the edge of complaining about her decision without having the nerve to go for broke. They’ve portrayed Adeney as a lonely, albeit successful, businesswoman who obviously had the IVF treatment in the Ukraine for all the wrong reasons. She is a ‘desperate divorcee' whose ‘sad, solitary existence’ somehow casts her beyond the limits of justified motherhood.

What on earth could they be driving at? Nudge, nudge.

They even managed to track down her husband from 20-odd years previously for a few less than flattering comments.

Even the wishy-washy Church of England has gotten in on the act, too: “A child is a gift not a right. For those who have never received that gift we can well understand their desire to have children but it is always important to think in those circumstances about what is really in the child's best interests.”

(Like not existing at all, presumably ...).

But is that the measure we use for other pregnancies? Er, no. Some pregnancies are planned but many aren't. Some are used to prop up a failing marriage. Some are used to move a relationship on. Some are the result of Saturday night carelessness and one glass of wine too many. Some because it's just what people do, isn't it?

But all that's ok because, well, we're talking about real people. You know, people in their 20s to around the 50 mark. Not wrinklies, though, because that just disgusting.

Elizabeth Adeney, at an admittedly casual glance, looks in good nick to me and could easily pass for much younger than her years. She's in a secure position financially to make sure that the child gets the very best materially (yes, I know that's not the be all and end all but it is a factor). And she obviously wants the child. All pluses, you’d think.

She's probably in better health than some of the casualties you see prowling up and down our main thoroughfares, offspring in tow. They may be in their 20s, but florid of face, puffing fags and, well, obese, there's a good chance they'll be handing on to their little darlings a health/psychological timebomb at least the equal of anything the Suffolk businesswoman might do. Often they’re bringing up their kids in a bleak existence on income support. At least, Adeney can pay to raise her own child.

But you don't — quite rightly, may I add — see those younger mums dragooned for wanting/having kids.

The only negative the critics can really think of as regards Adeney is the shadow of the Grim Reaper. There’s a reasonable chance that she may not see the baby grow up to be a teenager.

But what's perfect in life? To quote the man, stuff happens. Tragically plenty of young parents die young. And consequently lots of elderly people through circumstances beyond their control end up raising children as their own — or at least taking the primary share of the child-rearing responsibilities.

Grandparents have to step in and provide the love and support a child needs and no one bats an eyelid. So really it's the actual pregnancy that seems to give some the heebie-jeebies.

Why? Because it's ‘not natural'. Well, tons of things are ‘NN' — IVF for a start, whatever the age of the parents. Artificial kneecaps. Liver transplants. Face transplants. Electricity. Viagra. Need I go on? If we were to live entirely in line with ‘what's natural', Belfast would resemble Amish country with horse-drawn buggies clip-clopping along Royal Avenue. Also, if Adeney had been a 66-year-old man, it would have been cigars all round and to hell with the actuary tables. Life in the old dog yet and so on. There’d be no debates about children suffering psychological trauma there, I'll bet. Instead, we’d say that while he mightn’t be able to kick a ball with the nipper, he can give him the benefit of his great wisdom. But that's another story.

No, of course, Elizabeth Adeney’s pregnancy is not ideal, but the reaction surrounding her eight-month bump has shown up some of our deepest prejudices.

And what sort of society is that to raise a child in?

Post a comment

Limit: 500 characters

View all comments that have been posted about this article

Comment
Your details

* Required field

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.

Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.

I would love to pretend I'm a doctor. Would you like to me to practice on you? It's not ideal, and things might go wrong, but I'll give it the "good ol' college try." : )

Truthfully I don't want to judge anyone, but just because you can do it, doesn't mean it's necessarily right, and that would pertain to a lot of the things we do in life.

My suggestion is that you worry about what you are doing, and do what you feel is best for you.

Posted by The Judge | 17.06.09, 17:10 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Certainly Elizabeth's pregnancy is not ideal; but... who dares to judge her? Who knows the circumstances of her life.? She is lonely in this IMPERFECT world. Because, yes, this world is far, too far.... from perfect. Besides that, she is doing it in good faith. I am pretty sure she will give her child ALL the LOVE, WISDOM and MATERIAL FORTUNE that she has amassed throughout all these years. NOBODY knows what the future holds. Even young mothers die unexpectedly because of accidents, illness....

Posted by Carmen | 19.05.09, 22:58 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

To have an opinion is not necessarily a predudice, Gail. It is often a matter of common sense and to have a child at 66 is not common sense as it's more probable that the parent could die within a very short time. That is common sense as the older we become, the more disease we are prone to. So who will look after the child at death? I suppose it will be the state or more aptly the tax payer and many of us are tired paying too much tax for the irresponsible in our 'want', and not need, society.

Posted by robbo | 19.05.09, 21:05 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Have you thought that maybe the source of the critics worries is not because of her actual age but the statistics regarding disorders such as down syndrome in children from older females. As a woman ages, the chance of such disorders occurring increases in alarming numbers. Has it occurred to you that these kinds of statistic are what fuel the critics fire and not prejudice? Maybe, maybe not. But if you did, you didn't supply your readers with the information. Disgusting.

Posted by LRob | 19.05.09, 14:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

What a stunning commentary and absolutely a perfect analysis of what the actual furor is all about. She is an "old woman" and old women are gross. Only a young woman is beautiful enought to be pregant. you never see the fat cigarette puffing trailer trailer trash on the cover of working woman Now Magazine!
I am 44 and I plan on having more children when I meet Mr. Grown Up. I may not meet him until I am in my sixties so critics beware. My parents died when I was 23 and they never did grow up.

Posted by Sunshine23 | 19.05.09, 13:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Define 'natural'...100 years ago it was not 'natural' for people to live beyond the age of 50, now people are living beyond 110 even and this will extend with time. Some women DO continue to be fertile into their late 50's and even early 60's - fertility treatment just allows those who are not some equality with those women. Is it natural for elderly men to maintain erectile function - no - that is why we have viagra...but that is okay??? 'unnatural' today will be second nature in the future.

Posted by Wendy | 19.05.09, 12:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Columnist Comments

robert_mcneill

Brown gets right dunking over his cookie coyness

It is, I think, correct and fair to refer to Gordon Brown as a balloon, a numptie, a phoney, a nutter...

Columnist Comments

eamon_mccann

We do not need to be told the truth. We need truth to be told

Why Bloody Sunday? There have been bigger death tolls. Fifteen Catholics in McGurk’s Bar in the New Lodge in Belfast the previous month. Eighteen Paras at Warrenpoint in 1979.

Columnist Comments

lindy_mcdowell

Why Church must confess all for sake of my abused friend

For evil to succeed it is only necessary that good men either do nothing ? or that they get the victims of evil to sign vows of silence promising never to reveal details of the terrible abuse they suffered.

Columnist Comments

sharon_owens

Little pop tart Lady Gaga fills me full of dread for our daughters

If you go on Lady Gaga’s website you can buy a T-shirt that says ‘I’m A Free Bitch’.

Columnist Comments

gail_walker

Why Christine really is the One

Isn't our own Christine Bleakley turning out to be a really class act? Her Sport Relief Waterski Challenge was a kind of David Walliams/Eddie Izzard moment when the Newtownards woman moved officially into the ranks of minor national treasure.

Columnist Comments

eric_waugh

A lesson in history for Cameron: unionists always do it their way

If I refer to the imbroglio of the UUP as ‘the Hermon mess', I hope Lady Hermon will not take it amiss.

Columnist Comments

laurence_white

Marching into another summer of discontent

The Orange Order has given a qualified welcome to the work done by the DUP/Sinn Fein-packed Stormont body on how to resolve the issue of contentious parades in Northern Ireland.

Columnist Comments

ed_curran

Swashbuckling Sir Reg finally delivers a shot across the bows

No matter how much positive spin is placed on the transfer of policing and justice powers to Stormont, concerns remain. Will what has not worked in the past be any better in the future?

Columnist Comments

jane_graham

Loud, aggressive and mean, Carol’s number’s really up

For years she has been paraded as the ultimate poster girl for attractive, smart, self-sufficient forty-something women, but last week we saw the real face of Carol Vorderman and boy, it ain’t pretty.

Columnist Comments

robert_fisk

Robert Fisk: Democracy doesn't seem to work when countries are occupied by Western troops

In 2005 the Iraqis walked in their tens of thousands through the thunder of suicide bombers, and voted – the Shias on the instructions of their clerics, the Sunnis sulking in a boycott – to prove Iraq was a "democracy".

Columnist Comments

mark_steel

Mark Steel: The moment you think of voting Labour, up pops the unregretful Tony Blair

There are many questions a population asks itself before a General Election, and the one that many people are asking before the one this year is, "Which of these rancid heaps of sewage will be slightly less repulsive than the other?"

Columnist Comments

the_punter

The Trick is to avoid big two

Anyone fancy 5-2 about Kauto Star for the Gold Cup?

Columnist Comments

hamish_mcrae

Cost of pay freezes and high taxes was a culture of duplicity, envy and hypocrisy

The Chancellor was right yesterday to dismiss the idea of a High Pay Commission. His phraseology was characteristically mild: he was "not persuaded" of his merits.

TeleToons

TeleToons: Cartoons by Stevie Lee

 

Click here for audio version