Of course alcohol can be a problem, but so can doctors
Britain is getting drunker than ever, apparently, with a Government 'consultation' expected to reveal the shocking statistic that, compared with 20 years ago, there are 80% more documentaries or news items showing a clip of a girl in a short skirt being sick on a bench while a lad with no shirt makes a noise like a werewolf as he's thrown into a police van.
But more worrying is the increase in pompous doctors who come on the radio or programmes like The One Show to give us guidelines, telling us, "Those of us who think we're drinking moderately may still be at risk.
"For example, if you have one glass of wine and then later in life have another, you are technically an alcoholic."
Then they say, "Of course, there's no harm in drinking safely. I often enjoy an Italian wine with my evening meal, by opening the bottle and pouring it all into a bush. That way, there's only a small risk to my liver, as long as I do it once a month as a treat."
Websites offering advice on safe drinking offer tips such as, "If you're thinking of having a lager, consult your doctor first." Or, "One way of cutting down consumption while still enjoying a girls' night out is on alternate rounds, instead of having a drink, have a bowl of soup, or go canoeing."
On the Drinkaware website I looked at, I was told that three pints of medium-strength beer, twice a week, can lead to "heart disease, liver disease, impotence and cancer".
I didn't check, but I expect it went on, "and a fourth pint will cause cat flu, plague, rust, feeling like a woman trapped inside a man's body, fascism and a tendency to suddenly turn inside-out in the morning".
Still, alcohol can cause havoc, so we shouldn't be flippant. You only have to look at the demise of poor Amy Winehouse, who presumably had three pints of bitter on a Sunday and then another three the following Friday.
But the campaign against drunkenness doesn't seem to have learned from the 'just say no' anti-drugs campaign, which connects with hardly anyone as it insists drugs lead rapidly to disaster and aren't fun.
But if they weren't fun, there'd be no need to tell people not to take them, just as there's no need to tell people 'just say no' to sticking your bare behind into a nest of wasps because no one does it anyway because it's not fun.
Similarly, any attempt to reduce drunkenness must depend on acknowledging that people do it because it seems fun. The alcohol industry appears to be aware of this, which is why it markets drinks for teenagers as bursting with fun, then denies they're doing so with comments such as, "The product 'Marshmallow-alco', in which a marshmallow is filled with a cocktail of vodka and Southern Comfort, is not in any way aimed primarily at a younger market range."
But the Government's "consultation" is being run in conjunction with the alcohol industry, to such an extent that the British Medical Association has withdrawn from it altogether as a pointless exercise, because, if we were to be cynical, the drinks industry may not be the keenest group to find ways of cutting the sale of alcohol.
So the complex job of getting young people away from addiction will still be done by charities. But they have declared the cuts in rehab clinics have made that almost impossible, saying they could have devastating implications.
So we're left with doctors telling us not to drink sherry on two consecutive Christmases and, if Amy was still around, she could have updated her song by singing, "They tried to make me go to rehab, but they said, Clear off, we've shut."