NEWS WEBSITE OF THE YEAR

Belfast Telegraph

  • nijobfinder
  • nicarfinder
  • propertynews.com
  • Classified

Gaza crisis - What’s in a name? Quite a lot for the military

By Robert Fisk
Monday, 5 January 2009

I am bemused by the name of Israel's latest military operation against Hamas (and the usual cull of toddlers) in Gaza.

The Israeli military calls it Operation Cast Lead. Come again? “Cast Iron” I might understand, though it would woefully misrepresent Israel's policies since they will in due course talk to the “blood-soaked terrorists” of Hamas when it suites their purposes just as they eventually talked to the “blood-soaked terrorists” of the PLO.

Armies like to tell us that their operational names come from a computer, though I always doubted this. Operation Iraqi Freedom did not come from a computer. Operation Litani — Israel's hopeless 1978 invasion of Lebanon — didn't come from a computer either. Nor did Operation Peace for Galilee — the even more hopeless 1982 invasion of Lebanon that took the Israeli army to Beirut and infamy at Sabra and Chatila. Besides, the real military name of Peace for Galilee was Operation Snowball. And, as we know, snowballs get bigger as they roll along.

I always thought the armies of the Second World War had a better flair for names. Operation Overlord — D-Day on June 6, 1944 — was a real cracker. So was Operation Torch (the invasion of North Africa), though Operation Market Garden — the landings at Arnhem — pretty much reflected its dismal results.

Nazi Germany's ferocious Operation Barbarossa — the invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941 – was named after the 12th-century King Frederick of Germany and chief executive officer of the Holy Roman Empire. The cancelled German invasion of England in 1940 would have been Operation Sea Lion — although my research into Irish neutrality in the Second World War revealed that Germany's tentative plans to invade de Valera's island was to have been called merely Operation Green. Well, it would, wouldn't it? Churchill himself had strong views about such nomenclature.

Indeed, a disquisition on the subject can be found in a memo he wrote to General Hastings Lionel ‘Pug’ Ismay, his chief of staff, on August 8, 1943.“Operations in which large numbers of men may lose their lives”, Churchill wrote, “ought not to be described by code words which imply boastful and overconfident sentiment, such as ‘Triumphant', or, conversely, which are calculated to invest the plan with an air of despondency, such as ‘Woebetide', ‘Massacre', ‘Jumble', ‘Trouble', ‘Fidget', ‘Flimsy', ‘Pathetic', and ‘Jaundice'.”

Churchill also objected to “names of a frivolous character” and therefore banned Operations Bunnyhug, Billingsgate, Aperitif and Ballyhoo. He preferred names of the heroes of antiquity, figures from Greek and Roman mythology, the constellations and stars, famous racehorses — was it a ghost of this idea that persuaded the Ministry of Defence to call its 1990 airlift of troops to Saudi Arabia Operation Ascot? — and the names of UK and US war heroes.

The Americans followed Churchill's advice when they decided to organise a coup to overthrow Mohammad Mossadeq of Iran in 1953. They called it Operation Ajax, though this might actually have fallen into Churchill's “despondency” bracket. Ajax was second only to Achilles in bravery, but he killed himself in a fit of madness. ‘Monty’ Woodhouse, MI5's man in Tehran, chose a more prosaic name for the whole fandango — Operation Boot.

Muslim armies tend to be a little tiresome in their operational titles. During the Iran-Iraq war, the Iranians named their attacks after prayers and then gave them numbers. The Fajr (‘Dawn’) operation was followed by Fajr Two, Fajr Three, Fajr Four and so on. Not very inventive. I guess the most frightening Middle Eastern name of all was Israel's Operation Grapes of Wrath, which reached its appalling end after Israeli artillerymen killed 106 Lebanese civilians in the south Lebanese village of Qana in 1996.

Operation Grapes of Wrath (not a tribute to Steinbeck) took its name from the Bible’s vengeful Book of Deuteronomy where the song of Moses, before he dies leading his Jewish people towards the promised land, speaks of those who will be destroyed by the wrath of God: “The sword without, and terror within, shall destroy both the young men and the virgin, the suckling also with the man of grey hairs.”

Not a bad description of the Qana massacre. And this week, not a bad account of Israel’s Gaza shenanigans. Maybe the Israelis should take a leaf out of Iran’s book and call it Operation Grapes of Wrath Two.

Post a comment

Limit: 500 characters

View all comments that have been posted about this article

Comment
Your details

* Required field

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.

Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.

Spot on Mr C.

Posted by Mr Y | 06.01.09, 13:58 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Indeed, Israel should pull out and leave those poor missle shooting people of Hamas alone! They should mind their own business and stay put. So when a missle hits a group of pre schoolers holding hands walking to park, 'god willing', the clean up of body parts should be called 'Operation Mr. Fisk'.

Posted by Mr. C | 05.01.09, 20:07 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details
Runher October 2009

Runher.

For 5k and 10k results CLICK HERE

TeleToons

TeleToons by Stevie Lee

Click here for audio version