David Gordon: ‘Iris-gate’ will not go away
Thursday, 4 February 2010
Unfortunately for Peter Robinson, his return as First Minister is unlikely to bring him closure from the scandal surrounding his wife.
For one thing there is the inevitable political fallout from the fall of Iris.
Team Robinson was a formidable electoral double act in its day and its passing in such circumstances cannot leave him unscathed.
Meanwhile, an Assembly standards inquiry — currently on hold — is likely to take months.
It should involve the former MLA having her say, breaking the silence of the wife.
Should Mr Robinson have made register of interest declarations on her involvement with that property developer money? Should he have at least persuaded her to make belated declarations herself?
Such questions relate to whether the £50,000 was declarable in the first place by Mrs Robinson. That involves determining whether it was in any way connected to her MLA role.
Register of interest issues cannot just be decided on legal analysis. There are judgment calls to be made.
The MLA code of conduct says each member should declare financial matters “which might reasonably be thought by others to influence his or her actions, speeches or votes in the Assembly, or actions taken in his or her capacity as a Member of the Assembly”.
That phrase “reasonably be thought by others” is where the judgment call comes in.
- Text Size
Also in this section
- Why my kids feel Olympics are not the real thing now
- Mum's the word for Jen's woe
- Good vibes about Belfast film
- Why dreaded inspections are not making the grade

Photosales
niJobfinder
niCarfinder
Home Delivery
Propertynews
















It appears to me that Iris had just to tap these property developers on the shoulder for a hugh sum of money to be handed over without any proper process! Is it part of the property developers business plan to factor in very substantial sums of money to ensure the favour of those involved in the planing applicaion process? Is the acceptance of gratuities by local polititians normal practice
Posted by Ian | 05.02.10, 11:57 GMT
What astonishes me is that the DUP have dismissed Iris Robinson because of her adultery with a teenager and because she obtained dodgy loans. But did she do anything wrong? What would a QC say about her behaviour? My guess is her interest in the young man is no worse than Westminster MPs interest in their research assistants, and the whole matter of the loans is, at the moment, not proven to be either illegal or against the public interest. She is innocent until proven guilty
Peter Robinson against whom allegations have also been made has dismissed these by obtaining a QC s opinion.Why hasn't Iris Robinson been given these chances? Why haven't we heard anything from the women's movements about this?
Posted by Michael Dubitante | 04.02.10, 22:16 GMT