Debate on abortion can be civil
Wednesday, 22 October 2008
Print
Email
Ian Parsley’s letter (Writeback, October 14) is a genuine attempt to encourage a civil debate on the difficult matter of abortion. Unfortunately aspects of the letter fail to do this.
I fully accept that, too often, civility has not been a characteristic of those of us with pro-life convictions. That said, to suggest that any elected representative with pro-life views exists in a “moral ivory tower” fails to give due respect to political leaders and others who, after careful reflection, believe that it is right and just for legal protection to be given to unborn children.
Mr Parsley also suggests that the current legal position in Northern Ireland “does not stop abortions happening”. The current legal position does allow terminations of pregnancy in some quite specific circumstances. However, it is factually incorrect to suggest that Northern Ireland’s law does not have a significant impact on the numbers of abortions in Northern Ireland. Even when the approximately 1,300 women from Northern Ireland who travel to GB each year are added to the relatively few abortions lawfully performed in Northern Ireland, this falls massively short of the very sobering figure of 198,500 abortions performed in England and Wales each year.
Ian Parsley states that restricting access to abortion “is a breach of human dignity”. And that gets to the heart of the debate — our understanding of human dignity. Ian and I will agree that respect for human dignity should be fundamental to politics and society. Where we disagree is over whether or not human dignity embraces the unborn child. I believe it does and that my duties and obligations in society require me to respect that dignity. Our disagreement is genuine and sincere, but it can be civil — and it does not mean that either of us lives in a “moral ivory tower”.
BRIAN CROWE
Lisburn
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.
As long as the 4 main political parties are in hoc to religious groupings there will never be an informed, civil debate on abortion in Northern Ireland. I am glad I left.
Posted by M Spence | 22.10.08, 19:20 GMT
Let's have choice rather that dictatorship.
Posted by robbo | 22.10.08, 18:42 GMT
The rights of the unborn child must be balanced against those of the woman. Both need protection.
Abortion is essentially an intrusive medical procedure which changes the path of the future forever. What many pro-choice advocates fail to acknowledge is their 'sisters' suffering (who at one time were being encouraged to treat their pregnancy as nothing more than a spec of a cell).
These girls are many, on every abortion forum on the net, and are suffering terribly after their terminations. Yet, they are never spoken of. There are many women who are victims of abortion now, in the same sense that their unborn have been victims of a callas regime. The abortion debate MUST widen. Women do have freedom of choice now, but attempts at liberalising the law do nothing for the 'cause'. Many women are now under extreme pressure to have abortions and it is the constantly good publicity which abortion receives which enables this pressure to go on.
Posted by LOUISE | 22.10.08, 11:36 GMT