Is ‘just war’ an anachronism?
Thursday, 20 November 2008
As usual, Robert Fisk not only raises an important issue in his column (Belfast Telegraph, November 17) but provides interesting historical information which might usefully be looked at by some of those cheering for heroes returning from what can no longer be called ‘battlefields’.
Yes, the battlefields are there, but unlike in times past, modern wars are not confined to areas where men meet to slaughter one another.
Capitalism’s technology, almost absent where it could be vitally applied, no longer confines its industrialised murder to the battlefield.
Beginning with episode two of the 20th century world war which saw almost four times as many deaths of non-combatants as combatants, modern warfare is ruthlessly waged against the innocent.
Even heroes in an aeroplane dropping a 2,000kg bomb over Baghdad with, as one American general proclaimed, “the accuracy to hit a garage door” must acknowledge that what the same general cynically called “collateral damage” would be mostly innocent human beings.
Is it naivete or a surfeit of the real causes of war that allows jurists, politicians and Church leaders to insist that murdering a single prisoner is a ‘war crime’ and dropping tonnes of bombs on a large conurbation can be part of a ‘just war’?
Surely that latter phrase is now nothing but an absurd anachronism.
Richard Montague
Belfast
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.








.




















