‘Endangered’ Irish hare should never be a quarry species
Wednesday, 22 April 2009
The Ulster Wildlife Trust’s assertion that ‘our Irish hare population is not endangered at this time’ frankly beggars belief (Write Back, April 11).
Confirmation of long-term population decline, for which the trust and others are apparently still waiting, has been evident for around 100 years.
There are three significant and credible sources of data on Irish hare numbers in Northern Ireland, all of which point to a species in serious trouble.
Historical records kept by our large country estates until 1970 show an 80% decline in hare numbers since around 1900.
A survey carried out by the Department of Agriculture during 1986-1995 reported a further decline of over 50% in only 10 years.
The most recent published survey in 2008 counted only 187 hares, the lowest number recorded this decade.
This is further proof, if it were needed, that the decline in numbers remains unchecked.
It is true that Irish hare numbers fluctuate, but this phenomenon occurs within a predictable three-year cycle, clearly demonstrated by the available data.
Notwithstanding any short-term variations, the overall trend continues downward unabated.
The Irish hare’s disappearance from the landscape has not gone unnoticed by Northern Ireland’s rural community, over 70% of whom support immediate legal protection.
Here is a clear mandate for acting to protect our hares sooner rather than later and before it becomes too little, too late.
Those who oppose increased protection have failed to show any plausible justification for their position.
Statutory protection will complement a wider conservation strategy as well as send a clear signal that we are serious about saving this beleaguered species from extinction.
The situation demands urgency, not complacency. We must use every means at our disposal to preserve this unique animal and allowing the Irish hare to remain a quarry species is simply not an option.
Mike Rendle
Irish Hare Initiative, Tyrone
- Text Size

Photosales
niJobfinder
niCarfinder
Home Delivery
Propertynews
















While the human population is effectively culling itself mainly in areas of overpopulation,no such process applies to animals. We will have to get the bull by the horns, and reduce our animal population to a sustainable level. What we require is to do this by making a positive decision to provide a balance of genetic diversity in a much reduced animal population. We should begin with those animals which threaten the continuance of other species, to produce a new balance in nature. Too many animals have legal and emotional protection, which militates against natural well-being. Badgers for some reason are allowed to be as plentiful as rats, and imperil a whole range of bird life,frogs etc. Again seals are multiplying beyond all measure (Clyde 30,000-200,000 in ten years) a seal eats as much in a day as humans eat in a year. Sentiment must be sidelined, and good sense prevail!
Posted by Malachy McAnespie | 23.04.09, 11:27 GMT