Never mind oil we are approaching peak everything
Tuesday, 24 November 2009
The former media mogul Ted Turner challenged us in 1992 with this statement: "If we don’t make the right choices after we have all the information, then we don’t deserve to live.”
Well, we have more than enough information. Oil and gas, the stored sun’s energy, which took hundreds of millions of years to incubate, gone forever within this century. We are, in fact, approaching PEAK EVERYTHING.
Our planet will be around for millions of years, what gives us the right to dig out the last of the none-renewable resources and destroy the environment in the process? And now, nations are posturing to exploit the Arctic resources, just because they’re there?
The oceans, where life began, are fished out and used as convenient sewers, and ocean bottoms are scraped clean of all living things, with no thought given to future generations. This is just a fraction of what is ailing our world.
The never-ending pro-and-con arguments about global warming or climate change, whether men-or-sun-made, or even true, must look really ridiculous, when intelligently viewed from a cosmic-time perspective, and the future.
Eliminating needless competition and none-life-producing jobs and businesses, without anybody suffering, could cut resource and electricity demand and greenhouse gases drastically, and nature will take care of itself. We need a co-operative-participatory-shared-leisure society, where everybody’s NEEDS are supplied, as our planet requires for its health and survival privileged-educated-understanding and caring inhabitants.
How did it ever come about, that the farmers, workers and educators etc, who, nobody could live without, have to go begging for a living wage, while the financial and related paper shuffling institutions, who produce little of real value to society, are laughing all the way to the bank? Money is a debt token, a demand for goods and services, which, of course, costs resources and generates pollution. How, then, can someone in good conscience demand more than a fair share from our dwindling resources?
Perhaps any person who wants to be a leader in academia, business or politics should live and lead by example, with a new Global Ethic -- “Do not expect others to live with less than what you’re living with.”
Our planet is but a speck in the cosmos, but it’s unique, and perhaps the only planet in our galaxy that harbours life, as we know it. I refrain from saying ‘intelligent life’, because the wanton destruction of our beautiful world, through stupidity, greed and senseless wars, and letting over 26 000 children die of starvation every day, is a crime that must reverberate throughout the universe.
Instead of getting distressed over a puck or a ball from thousands of miles away, or whether Dumbledore is gay, we ought to get excited about the source of life, the big ball we’re living on!
Gunther Ostermann
Kelowna, BC. Canada (via email)
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.






















Well stated Gunther Ostermann! We haven't yet become civilized. Are we thinking or simply rearranging our prejudices? Let's wake up and assess humanity's role in the universe.
Posted by Helen Diemert | 25.11.09, 19:02 GMT
Well said YIP. It is depressing how most people just want to carry on with their lives of working, consuming and watching TV - and care about nothing or nobody else. Anyone who appears to think outside the box is treated like a lunatic.
Posted by Zip | 25.11.09, 00:42 GMT
Ah Gunther. The old "all men are created equal but some are more equal than others" routine? How disappointingly unoriginal I certainly expect some to live with less than I live with in much the same way that I expect some to live with more. If I work 60 hours a week, why should I have the same lifestyle as a layabout who refuses to get out of bed and look for a job? If I work in a highly stressful job for those 60 hours which is emotionally unrewarding why should I have the same financial return as someone who works the same hours but in a stress free and rewarding environment? For the answer to your ever so perplexing question about why farmers and teachers are paid less than some other professions I suggest you review "the diamond water paradox".
Posted by Capitalism rules | 24.11.09, 12:25 GMT
Richard, that would be the real world in which you live of course. And you define what's real and what's important in that world do you ?
Gunther is talking sense. We are basically busy destroying the systems on which we depend for life whilst our primary concern is who is winning X-Factor.
I hope you're happy in that real world of yours.
Posted by Yip | 24.11.09, 11:48 GMT
"Eliminating needless competition and none-life-producing jobs and businesses, without anybody suffering"
Are you planning on joining us in the real world any time soon, Gunther?
Posted by Richard | 24.11.09, 09:31 GMT