Prison forums simply good, modern practice
Friday, 11 December 2009
I WISH to clarify a number of issues relating to Alan Murray's article 'Killers given a say in how prison is run' (December 9).
In the report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons/Chief Inspector of Criminal Justice in Northern Ireland follow-up inspection of Maghaberry between January 19-23, 2009, the inspectorate made a repeat recommendation from an earlier inspection: "Monthly minuted house meetings should be introduced between prisoner representatives and staff." The Inspectorate noted "prisoners still had no opportunity to meet as a group to discuss their experiences with staff".
As a result of this and similar recommendations in the report, the Northern Ireland Prison Service has been rolling out Prisoner Forums not only at Maghaberry, but all three prison establishments in Northern Ireland.
These forums have been running for several months and are a useful tool in the engagement process between prisoners and staff. Such forums are standard in England and in many other countries. Elsewhere the article refers to "a review of the use of electronic grilles" in Maghaberry. This is in response to a key recommendation of the Pearson Report, which stated: "Physical security needs should be reviewed and a sensible balance struck between security and good order."
For many years the primary focus of the prison regime was of a security nature, but the approach of the modern Prison Service is more of engagement with prisoners and offender management.The Prison Service must change its ways in line with good practice elsewhere, a point reflected in your leading article in the same edition.
BRIAN McAVOY
Head of communications, Northern Ireland Prison Service
Post a comment
Limit: 500 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.
Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.



























Good they can talk to prisoners but can't seem to communicate with their own staff and have no apparent good practices there!
Posted by H | 12.12.09, 10:35 GMT
How about, next, letting the lunatics run the asylum ? Sounds like it is already happening in the Prison Service, as 'Good, Modern Practice '.
Posted by Anyonebutunited | 11.12.09, 20:19 GMT
Brian,
Can I offer you a bit of free advice?
The 'Head of Communications' (a spin doctor in modern-day parlance) should not be the person who 'signs' this type of letter. You should draft the letter and then get some other overly-paid muppet (do prisons have Managing Directors?) to sign it.
Think about it, who cares what the 'Head of Communications' says No offence..
Posted by WH | 11.12.09, 18:51 GMT
Nice bit of spin Brian- I don't think anybodys fooled
Posted by DC | 11.12.09, 13:59 GMT
Really Brian? Or just another example of the western world gone completely mad.
Posted by james | 11.12.09, 13:35 GMT
Brian, catch yourself on. Bad enough these scumbags run the country, now you want them having a say in the running of the jails. Why not just give them the keys and all your lot can go home. First our police service has become a joke and now the prison service. The country has indeed gone mad!!!!
Posted by William | 11.12.09, 09:35 GMT