GET THE BELFAST TELEGRAPH NEWSPAPER DELIVERED TO YOUR DOOR EVERY DAY

Belfast Telegraph

  • nijobfinder
  • nicarfinder
  • propertynews.com
  • Classified

Gordon Brown’s £50bn gamble

Thursday, 9 October 2008

Now we know exactly how much the financial turmoil in the money markets is going to cost us - a whopping £2,000 for each taxpayer.

There are two ways of looking at the Chancellor’s £50bn rescue plan to underpin the British banking system. The cynical view is that £2,000 is being swiped from our back pockets to pay for the profligacy and mis-management of financiers. The other view — and the one the government hopes is correct — is that we are investing in our own future.

By taking a stake in the banks and other financial institutions and by capping executive pay and shareholder dividends, the government has essentially part-nationalised the banking system. By using taxpayers’ money and record borrowings, the government is hoping to restore confidence in the markets and to provide the banks with the capital needed for their everyday activities. It is an attempt to kick-start the return to normality.

The Bank of England’s decision, along with other central banks around the world, to reduce interest rates by 0.5% is another mechanism for restoring confidence. That should mean cheaper loans and the restoration of some movement in the crucial housing market which has become stagnant in recent months. It will also make borrowing for business cheaper, although there are precious few companies at present considering investing or expanding. Indeed, the predictions are that unemployment throughout the UK is set to rise to more than two million as recession looms.

The government’s intervention model is something akin to that introduced with success in the Nordic countries in the 1990s when the banking system there neared collapse. By taking a stake in financial institutions and by suggesting better governance of them in future, the hope is that the public will buy into the scheme just as the major banks already have.

Such is the volatility of the money markets at the moment that even yesterday’s dramatic and unprecedented intervention by government, in agreement with the financial institutions, has not brought any sign of immediate stability or recovery. The markets are so nervous at the moment, that some people are

already asking what will happen if this plan does not work. The answer to that is no-one knows as the situation goes beyond the experience of practically everyone, everywhere. The government has begged and borrowed everything it can and the solvency of the country will be in question if the plan does not succeed. Even if it does work, there will still be hard times ahead. Having emptied the pockets of the taxpayer to shore up the financial sector, there is little money left for any improvement of public services. Even funding them at the current level may require some sleight-of-hand accountancy.

The fear is that taxes may have to rise as a result of recent events, although that is a step which an already unpopular government would be loathe to take except in extremis. Gordon Brown will be hoping desperately that this plan restores stability to the financial world proving his claim that this is no time for novice politicians to be taking the helm of government. Success could boost his standing in the country, but he would be foolish to bank on it.

Post a comment

Limit: 500 characters

View all comments that have been posted about this article

Comment
Your details

* Required field

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by BelfastTelegraph.co.uk's Terms of Use.

Posts submitted in UPPERCASE letters will be rejected.

Excuse my ignorance, but can anyone explain how this £2000 will be taken from the tax-payer? I assume it means £2000 spread over 10 years or something like that in increased taxes?

Posted by Michael | 09.10.08, 15:20 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Also in this section

Columnist Comments

gail_walker

Why we’ve had enough of all the party games

By the time you read this, the chances are that Peter and Martin will have announced ‘Peace In Our Time'.

Columnist Comments

lindy_mcdowell

The UUP’S spin doctor is right to spurn new pact

His may not exactly be a household name. But in unionist politics (small u — and large) Alex Kane has long been a central figure.

Columnist Comments

laurence_white

Why the deal isn’t the final piece of devolution jigsaw

The agreement on the devolution of policing and justice is probably the biggest con since snake oil vendors were in their pomp.

Columnist Comments

robert_mcneill

Why life in the wild isn’t really Garden of Eden

Animals, eh?.... What are they about? We can't live with the big, fierce ones, and we can't live without the little, cuddly ones.

Columnist Comments

eamon_mccann

Take a cue from amazing Grace and slap the cuffs on Tony Blair

What a joy it is in these dour times to be able to exalt the name of Grace McCann. No relation, unfortunately.

Columnist Comments

robert_fisk

Robert Fisk: Israel can no longer ignore existence of first Holocaust

While Israelis commemorated the second Holocaust of the 20th century this week, I was reading the records of the victims of the century's first Holocaust.

Columnist Comments

the_punter

Rafa still has a way to go in sack race

Rafa Benitez is taking a lot of flak and there is no let-up in demands for his sacking at Liverpool.

Columnist Comments

hamish_mcrae

Cost of pay freezes and high taxes was a culture of duplicity, envy and hypocrisy

The Chancellor was right yesterday to dismiss the idea of a High Pay Commission. His phraseology was characteristically mild: he was "not persuaded" of his merits.

TeleToons

TeleToons by Stevie Lee

 

Click here for audio version