Alex Ferguson celebrates with the Premiership trophy after Manchester United's 17th league title
James Lawton: Ferguson kept from grand exit by thirst for the fight
Monday, May 12, 2008
The question will again be on many lips now that Sir Alex Ferguson has
confirmed the strength of arguably football's most ferociously realised
comeback.
With his 19th major title for Manchester United, his 10th annexation of the
world's most powerful football league – and the imminent possibility that in
the old Moscow citadel of the oligarch Roman Abramovich he can deliver a
final swordstroke to the man who presumed he had the wealth, and the coach,
Jose Mourinho, to invade and diminish his empire – Ferguson will once again
be asked if it is not time to take his last and ultimately triumphant hurrah.
Consider the incentives of retirement for the 66-year-old who has lasted
longer and more successfully than any of the men who shaped his ambitions
when he was the overachieving striker of Rangers bred in the dockside
streets of Govan – his countrymen Sir Matt Busby, Jock Stein and Bill
Shankly. We might also profitably reflect on how much more profoundly
satisfying such a Caesar's farewell might be now than when it was first
suggested to him after his astonishing treble of '99, when he raced along
the touchline of the Nou Camp after winning the European Cup, the Premier
League and the FA Cup.
Then, he would have been leaving at the more conventional age of 57 and at
the end of a cycle of power and accomplishment which had seen him match his
great predecessor Busby's achievement of making three title-winning teams
crowned by the mastery of Europe. Now, he could point to the unprecedented
creation of a fourth team – an achievement that in these days, when every
football club is at the mercy of its profit line, the ebb and flow of the
circumstances, and perhaps also the whims of its most significant investors,
has almost certainly become untouchable.
Now he would be marked also by extraordinary survival, at an age when every
other significant figure in football had chosen, or been required, to take
at last a sniff of the flowers, on the very brink of career destruction.
Whatever was thought of the wisdom of his decision to fight the Irish power
brokers John Magnier and J P McManus over the ownership of the racehorse
Rock Of Gibraltar, his re-emergence – not only with no more than flesh
wounds but also as a transcendent winner, the greatest in the history of
English football – puts him in a class of combativeness entirely of his own.
It is a class marked indomitable. It is a way of thinking and fighting never
likely to be compromised or checked by the debilitating effects of rational
calculation or reflection. It comes, astonishingly when you think about it,
not from the experience of age but, still, the vigour of youth that was
never satisfied.
Here, probably, we have the essential futility of those who seek to
influence some grand exit from football by a man who did once hover over the
possibility of walking away.
His closest ally, and warmest supporter at Old Trafford, Sir Bobby Charlton
– the man who passionately argued the case for his appointment in 1986 – has
reported how he was prepared to make a last stand against what he would have
considered a wastefully premature abdication.
In his autobiography Charlton recalled: "Alex could have walked away at any
point after delivering the treble and been given all the acclaim and honour
that went to the Old Man [Busby] when he decided he had done enough in the
game. However, when he announced he was doing it four years ago I was
shocked. It seemed such a waste of a unique competitive intensity which was
not staunched in any way. But then what could I say? If ever a manager had
earned the right to go in what he considered his own good time it was surely
this one. He announced that he had talked it over with his wife Kath and his
sons and decided it was time to sip the vintage wine and pursue his racing
interests.
"I wondered was it really time to begin the search for the right man to pick
up the baton at Old Trafford? No, I didn't really think so. Certainly there
was no lack of impressive candidates, stretching from Martin O'Neill to such
Italian coaching giants as Ferguson's friend Marcello Lippi – but who knew
more about the needs of the club, and who was more capable of meeting them,
than the man who had already done so quite brilliantly and, it seemed to me,
was still at the peak of his powers? It was a conviction I nursed and was
determined to express before he finally walked away.
"It was thus something of a relief when we met at the Old Trafford lift one
morning and he said, 'I've had a chat with Kath and I've decided I'm staying
on. I smiled and said to myself, 'Surprise, surprise'."
But then how much less so would it be if he was to pass on a different
decision to Charlton on another morning soon when Old Trafford, with all its
pressures and its expectations, stirs into life? The question is relative
because if Ferguson still conjures all the old passions, and sometimes
risibly one-eyed interpretations of anything that even vaguely touches the
interests of his team and his club, if he still celebrates his players as
though he has helped to make them with his own hands, he is six years older
than when he last weighed in the balance the heat of action and cool recall
of a job that in so many ways could not have been better done.
Three of those years, let us not forget, were besieged with angst. The Irish
war threatened the unravelling of a masterful image. The onslaught of
Chelsea's wealth and Mourinho's ego – fuelled by two league titles and
confirmation that he had a rare ability to organise and inspire devotion
even in players whose monthly wages cheque would blunt the competitive drive
of most ordinary men – further undermined the idea that Ferguson, with the
enduring challenge of Arsène Wenger's Arsenal, would for the foreseeable
future set the agenda for English football. Wouldn't Ferguson only have been
human to have reconsidered then the wisdom of aborting his stroll away down
the high road of football history?
But then maybe we are missing here something vital from the equation.
Perhaps we are overlooking the essence of the Ferguson story. Could it be
that in the end his results are secondary to the fight itself?
Certainly few in any area of the sporting life restore themselves so quickly
after the pain of a significant defeat. Ferguson, even after the Champions
League semi-final débâcle in Milan last season, which might have ravaged the
confidence of most managers in their teams, and the long-term underpinning
of their own futures, was quick to believe again in the heroic pictures he
had painted around the talents of Cristiano Ronaldo and Wayne Rooney. So
often it seems that defeat is not the demon in the life of Sir Alex
Ferguson. It is the horror of not having the chance to square it away, to
avenge it with the most exquisite pleasure.
Whenever he goes, and however he does it, that, we have to believe, will be
the cruellest loss of all.