The departure of Cesc Fabregas means the end of more than just a tiresome transfer story. For years he was not merely Arsenal's captain, talisman and best player, but their tactical keystone.
The team was arranged around him, and moved at his behest. Few modern English clubs have had such an ideological bent as modern Arsenal, and never has a player so embodied a system.
But now he is gone. And Samir Nasri, who represented the same distinct Arsenal style, will likely follow him.
Fabregas and Nasri so epitomise Wenger's plans that their exit feels like the end of a chapter.
The narrative of post-Invincibles Arsenal is well known.
After completing one of the most remarkable achievements in the history of English club football in 2004, Arsene Wenger won the FA Cup in 2005 but, coinciding with the 2006 move to the Emirates, adopted new policies.
With the stadium needing paying for, Wenger adopted a self-sustaining model of recruitment. Players were bought as boys and sold as men, generating the required money.
Fabregas is the best example, but Gael Clichy and Emmaneul Adebayor also turned a profit. This meant that Arsenal teams had a provisional feel.
But it was Fabregas and Nasri, born seven weeks apart, who were meant to stay and be the two-chambered heart of the side. The importance of the pair was even clearer when it came to the game itself.
Possession football, as well as youth, was the post-Invincibles approach. Wenger abjured the athleticism of the 2003/04 team, valuing instead technique and patience. For the last few seasons the side, playing a Barcelona-style 4-3-3, has been constructed around Fabregas.
Fabregas's response to the responsibilities thrust upon him rarely failed to astonish. From the age of 18, he was Arsenal's leading midfielder and chief creator. Everything that was good about Arsenal was good about Fabregas.
From his technical perfection, to his understanding of space, to his zealotry about how the game ought to be played. The sense he was always a Barcelona player in a red shirt was not entirely damaging.
It was no surprise the best recent moments of Arsenal bore his authorship. He set up Adebayor for the win at Old Trafford in 2006. He scored from distance at the San Siro as Milan were knocked out of Europe in 2008. At the Emirates last season he masterminded the defeats of Chelsea, in which he scored, and Barcelona, in which he released Nasri to set up Andrei Arshavin's goal.
For all those moments, though, there were never the trophies which would have made it worthwhile.
In an interview with Don Balon in April, the Arsenal captain bemoaned his club's approach. “We haven't been successful since 2007, despite playing good football,” he said. “That's when you realise that it doesn't work.”
And while last season brought another challenge, the way it ended was dispiriting. Arsenal lost the Carling Cup final in the last minute, and went into a disastrous spiral. They won just three of their final 14 matches.
Most worryingly, Arsenal finished fourth in the Premier League, behind Manchester City, Nasri's likely destination.
While Fabregas and Nasri have their own separate motivations for wanting to leave, there is a suspicion that, had Arsenal been better and won trophies, the midfield pair might have stayed.
Nasri has already said this summer that he “came to England to get trophies” and that his priority was to “make a big career and to win titles.”
Wenger said in April, though, that “to be consistent at the top level is the most difficult and important thing in our job.”
For him, 14 years of Champions League qualification is more important.
His team's flaws are well known — the mental fragility and the failure to win games that United or Chelsea would always see out. The 4-4 defeat at Newcastle and a 3-2 loss at Wigan the worst examples.
Ultimately, the team built around Fabregas and Nasri has not been good enough to compel their interest. The pair were meant to be the future of Arsenal but now they are the past. For them, Arsenal was, in Patrice Evra's memorable phrase, “a football training centre” — a phase in their development but only that.