Chelsea manager Avram Grant spoke during the during a Chelsea Media Open Day ahead of next week's Champions League final in Moscow
Grant claims 'influenced' referees helped United
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Avram Grant has fired the first shots in the battle of wills before next
Wednesday's Champions League final by suggesting that Manchester United were
helped by referees in their Premier League triumph this season.
In a rare moment of controversy, the Chelsea manager said that some English
referees had been subject to "influence" and that he was glad the final in
Moscow would be refereed by a foreigner.
Having made an art of restraint since he took the Chelsea job in September
from the great provocateur Jose Mourinho, Grant's comments are likely to
catch the eye of the Football Association. The Israeli railed against what
he saw as a bias in United's favour, claiming that some of the country's top
officials favoured Sir Alex Ferguson's team. "I think in England there are
some very good referees," he said. "But there are some, a few of them, you
can influence, like you saw."
He was referring to three incidents, two of which took place last Sunday
when referee Steve Bennett was in charge of United's title-clinching 2-0
victory over Wigan at the JJB Stadium. Grant mentioned "the red card [that
was not awarded] for [Paul] Scholes on Sunday should have been. Then there
was the penalty [awarded to Wayne Rooney]. He also said that John Obi
Mikel's red card in Chelsea's game against United in September – refereed by
Mike Dean – was undeserved.
The Scholes incident, in which Bennett did not give him a second yellow card
for a blatant block on Wilson Palacios in the first half, has been the
source of much discussion since Sunday. The penalty that was given for
Emmerson Boyce's foul on Rooney less so. However, despite Grant's subsequent
attempts to backtrack and congratulate United on their success, his comments
are certain to strain already uneasy relations between the two clubs.
The Chelsea manager has always been reluctant to go on the attack this
season, mindful of how Mourinho tested the patience of the club owner Roman
Abramovich with his outbursts, but evidently he has taken counsel having
watched replays of Sunday's game and decided to speak out. "I told you I
believe in the tradition of the fair English game, I will not say anything
against this," he said. "But what happened [against Wigan] is what I
expected."
Ferguson will get his chance to respond today and he rarely passes up an
opportunity to remind a referee of his responsibilities, even thought the
man in question has not yet been named for Wednesday's game.
With the final also a focus for Grant's future, the Israeli was
characteristically evasive on the subject. His protest that nothing had
changed between him and the club's hierarchy was in the absence of any firm
statement either way on his future. "I will make it very, very easy for
you," he said. "I have a contract for four years. It's a contract between
friends, even though we don't want to involve friends in business."
Later Grant contradicted himself, saying that "we do not involve friendship
in our jobs". He behaves like a man whose job is safe although there is no
evidence of that being unequivocally the case, especially given chief
executive Peter Kenyon's recent refusal to give a definitive answer on
Grant's future. "If the club is not happy with me, no problem," he said. "If
I'm not happy with them, and I want to leave, I don't think they will make
any problems either."
Grant said that he had only begun to change Chelsea according to his vision
and had not wanted to act like "an elephant in a china shop and break
everything" when he arrived. "If you want to be a big club, you need to be
between the lions of Europe. That means you need to be in the final. We've
reached that and now want more. In the next years you will see the
development. I'm not saying we will be in the final every year but we need
to be at least challenging and this will not be the last time we are in the
final."