Gavin Mairs: Genesis is hardly the beginning of new era
Friday, December 21, 2007
As Robert Louis Stevenson once said: everybody, sooner or later, will sit
down to a banquet of consequences.
I was reminded of this quotation from the Scottish novelist this week during
an in-depth discussion about the current problems facing Irish rugby and the
men empowered to make decisions on its behalf.
There can be no
doubt that the boom years of this decade are well and truly over for the
game on this island and never before have the IRFU faced more crucial
decisions to make at both national and provincial level.
The strong
currents of professionalism have ensured that the landscape is constantly
changing - both in terms of playing power and financial muscle - and there
is a danger that without robust, enlightened and shrewd leadership, Irish
rugby may get left behind.
But the IRFU's reaction to the World Cup
shambles, when Ireland so spectacularly blew their chances with the
so-called 'golden generation' has offered little hope on that front.
To me, the sole objective of the Genesis Report seems to have been to delay
the consequences' banquet of the decision to hand Eddie O'Sullivan a
four-year extension to his contract before a ball was kicked at the World
Cup.
To be fair to the Union, at the time discussions with
O'Sullivan began, he had just guided Ireland to a third Triple Crown and was
being talked of in wide circles as the Lions coach in-waiting.
Yet
even at the time, such a long extension to a coach who was gearing up for
his seventh year at the helm and was still contracted until the end of this
season, looked misjudged.
And when the wheels fell off with such
disastrous consequences at the World Cup - the ultimate testing ground for
both players and coaches - the IRFU should have simply put their hand up,
admitted their mistake and made a change.
Or at least, as New
Zealand did with Graham Henry, have made O'Sullivan re-apply for his job.
Instead, almost three months after the defeat to Argentina that consigned
Ireland to the World Cup rubbish dump, the review by Genesis, who
incidentally were involved in the process to draw up Ireland's eight-year
strategic plan in 2003, has just muddled the situation further.
The
recommendations to appoint a manager, a backs coach - which is O'Sullivan's
area of expertise - and a psychologist, effectively will severely clip the
Ireland's coach wings but without getting to the heart of the problem.
O'Sullivan spent the last six years increasing his powerbase and control of
Team Ireland and enjoyed more resources and player access than any coach
before him.
To then simply blame a lack of big match practice for
Ireland's woeful performance, despite having had a four-year run-in, and
attribute collective responsibility when the report's recommendations
effectively reflect that O'Sullivan had too much control over the team
affairs, is at best contradictory.
The reality is that should
Ireland win less than three or possibly even four games in their Six Nations
campaign, O'Sullivan is likely to go anyway and, interestingly, the new
appointments won't be made until after the tournament.
Closer to
home, the appointment of the new Ulster coach is also the Ulster Branch
power-brokers' biggest and most crucial decision of the professional era,
given the dire straits that the team find themselves in and given the number
of key players considering their futures.
A wrong decision now and
the consequences could make for a foul-tasting fare.