DNA test could find kidnapper
Method used in Omagh case is crucial to solving Maddie mystery says ex-Ulster cop
Sunday, 20 September 2009

Former detective inspector Dave Edgar, hired by the McCann family to lead the investigation into the hunt for Madeleine McCann
A controversial DNA test used in the failed Omagh bomb case is the key to finding Madeleine McCann’s kidnapper, Ulster investigator Dave Edgar has claimed.
But the former RUC detective sergeant’s team will never be able to use it as Portuguese authorities will not give him access to forensic information.
Speaking exclusively to Sunday Life at the HQ of his Alpha Investigations Group in Cheshire, the ex-cop leading the search for Maddie believes that DNA tests, which can establish a profile from just a few cells, could help solve the mystery.
Edgar said he tries to maintain “a decent relationship” with Algarve cops but has blasted them for contaminating the scene of her disappearance.
He claimed if Low Copy Number (LCN) DNA testing had been carried out at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, where Maddie vanished from two years and four months ago, it is “highly likely” her abductor would have been nailed.
LCN DNA is a highly sensitive forensic procedure which magnifies potential evidence that is unidentifiable by traditional DNA testing.
It can obtain a perpetrator’s profile from only a few cells as small as a millionth the size of a grain of salt. Some argue its magnification method leaves evidence open to distortion.
Doubts were raised when south Armagh electrician Sean Hoey was cleared of charges connected to the Omagh bombing in a case which focused on LCN DNA.
But Dave has seen it work before. His team used it in 2007 to snare killer Stephen Mottram, who stabbed love-rival Andrew Batterton to death in a jealous rage.
Dave said: “It’s an amazingly powerful tool, so it’s a real shame we will never get to use it with Maddie.”
Prosecutors in the Omagh case claimed that LCN analysis had shown links between the bomb timers used in the attack and Hoey.
But the judge rejected the use of the technique because it was not yet seen to be at a sufficiently scientific level to be considered evidence and Hoey was cleared of a total of 58 charges, including 29 murders.
A UK-wide suspension of the technique after the Omagh case collapsed was lifted in January of last year and detectives are now free to use it again.
The PSNI has championed Low Copy Number DNA analysis, pointing out that it helped catch Trevor Hamilton, the serial offender who brutally murdered Strabane pensioner Attracta Harron in December 2003.
LCN DNA was also crucial to the conviction fireman Gordon Graham for the 2000 murder of
Lisburn man Paul Gault, husband of Graham’s Fire Service lover Lesley, a mum of triplets.
Graham battered his love rival to death with a hockey stick and tried to the make the killing look like work of a burglar.
But Graham’s attempt to commit the ‘perfect crime’ was undone by traces of his sweat found on the handle of sports bag at the Gault's Audley Park home.
Graham, who has always denied the murder, was ordered to serve a minimum 18 years behind bars by the judge who branded him “brutal and merciless” killer.
- Text Size

Photosales
niJobfinder
niCarfinder
Home Delivery
Propertynews















I dont understand this article / statement by Mr Edgar -
LCN DNA analysis has been used in this case already - it was used on the samples found in the apartment and car as far as I am aware it is in the official police file.
Posted by Geoff Durham | 20.09.09, 17:34 GMT
Portuguese 'DNA' technique was discredited at Omagh bomb trial
Article from:Belfast Telegraph Article date:August 7, 2008 Author:JONATHAN McCAMBRIDGE
The same science which was used in the Omagh bombing trial led to the parents of Madeleine McCann being declared suspects by Portuguese police. JONATHAN McCAMBRIDGE reports on the controversy surrounding Low Copy Number DNA
PORTUGUESE police evidence used against the parents of Madeleine McCann was based on the same controversial scientific technique which was discredited during the failed Omagh bombing trial.
Police made the couple suspects based on controversial Low Copy Number DNA evidence that found a DNA match for the missing girl in her parents' car. However, serious doubts had already been cast on this technique during evidence in the Omagh trial and it was later criticised by the ...
Has Mr Edgar read the police files? Or anything about Madeleine's case at all???
Posted by Casandra Del Rio | 20.09.09, 15:13 GMT
Has he actually read the available files of the investigation were the forensic's are also available? LCN was used in this case. Why doesn't he know that? Especially as the technique was used to attempt to identify the DNA gathered from behind the sofa were the EVRD and blood dog indicated and in the boot of his clients hire car, were also the EVRD indicated. The results although showing some similarities to Madeleine McCann herself were inconclusive.
How can he not know this?
Posted by Margaret | 20.09.09, 13:39 GMT
OK, now I am convinced, he has never ever read the police files.
Posted by Martin | 20.09.09, 13:35 GMT
What a very silly report, both by Mr Edgar ans also by Aaron Tinney.
Are they not aware that LCD testing of DNA samples relating to Maddie's disappearance were carried out by the FSS in the UK, on behalf of Leicester Police ?
Words fail me.
Such a display of dual ignorance by Mr Edgar and Mr Tinney.
Regards,
Peter M
Engand
Posted by Peter | 20.09.09, 13:31 GMT
Low Copy Number (LCN) DNA was USED by the FSS to determine various samples and evidences in the Madeleine McCann Case. Is this 'investigator' for real?! Did he actually ever read the DVD process released by the Portuguese Public Ministry? Because it's all there, the FSS Low Copy Number results, etc...
Posted by Joana | 20.09.09, 13:21 GMT