Investigatory Powers Bill officially passes into law, giving UK the 'most extreme spying powers ever seen'
The Bill received large opposition from petitions, but not within parliament
The UK officially has the “most extreme spying powers ever seen”.
The Investigatory Powers Act has now been given royal assent, meaning that those surveillance rules will pass into law. The bill was officially unveiled a year ago and passed through the House of Lords earlier this month, but the act of being signed off means that those powers now go into effect.
It adds new surveillance powers including rules that force internet providers to keep completely records of every website that all of their customers visit. Those will be available to a wide range of agencies, which includes the Department for Work and Pensions as well as the Food Standards Agency.
As well as those internet connection records, surveillance agencies will also be given new powers to force companies to help hack into phones, and to collect more information than ever before on anyone in Britain.
The Home Office hailed the new law as a “landmark Bill which sets ot and governs the powers available to the police, security and intelligence agencies to gather and access electronic communications”. It said in a statement that it “brings together and updates existing powers while radically overhauling how they are authorised and overseen”.
Your entire internet history to be viewable by PSNI, taxman, DWP and Food Standards Agency and other government bodies within weeks
- Tens of thousands sign petition urging Parliament to recall 'most extreme spying powers ever'
Not all of the powers available in the Bill will be rolled out straight away. Some require testing so will not be ready for some time, the Home Office said.
But others replace the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, also known as Dripa, which is set to expire on 31 December and so urgently needed updating with the new bill.
Home Secretary Amber Rudd said: “This Government is clear that, at a time of heightened security threat, it is essential our law enforcement, security and intelligence services have the powers they need to keep people safe.
“The internet presents new opportunities for terrorists and we must ensure we have the capabilities to confront this challenge. But it is also right that these powers are subject to strict safeguards and rigorous oversight.
“The Investigatory Powers Act is world-leading legislation that provides unprecedented transparency and substantial privacy protection.”
The Bill has been opposed by tens of thousands of people in a petition. But that is thought to have begun too late and so is likely not to lead to any change in the law.
- UK parliament passes Digital Economy Bill, forcing people to register if they want to watch porn and banning many sex acts
Civil liberties group Liberty said that the law served as a “beacon for despots everywhere”.
“It’s a sad day for our democracy as this Bill – with its eye-wateringly intrusive powers and flimsy safeguards – becomes law,” said Bella Sankey, the group’s policy director.
“The Home Secretary is right that the Government has a duty to protect us, but these measures won’t do the job. Instead they open every detail of every citizen’s online life up to state eyes, drowning the authorities in data and putting innocent people’s personal information at massive risk.
“This new law is world-leading – but only as a beacon for despots everywhere. The campaign for a surveillance law fit for the digital age continues, and must now move to the courts.”
An Alliance Party spokesperson told the Belfast Telegraph: "The extensive powers in the bill represent an unjustified intrusion into the private lives of citizens: not only is it a diminution of our privacy rights but access to so much data, rather than targeted surveillance, could be detrimental to security - literally a case of not being able to see the wood for the trees.
"Naomi Long voted against the bill whilst an MP. Alliance is opposed to any attempt to widen the right of government to monitor data and communications speculatively without having to go to a judge and show they had just cause to do so.
"The arrangements which were in place ensured a balance between security and privacy: the current rules do not."
The DUP, Sinn Fein, UUP and the SDLP were asked for comment but did not respond.
Independent News Service