'Some people look noble in a wig, but I look really silly'
Katherine Parkinson and Will Sharpe join forces in Defending The Guilty - a brand new courtroom comedy that shines a light on an often messy and flawed legal system. Gemma Dunn hears more
Courtroom dramas may be a mainstay on TV - but what happens when you add comedy into the mix?
Your Honour, please stand for Defending The Guilty. A brand-new BBC Two sitcom written by Cuckoo's Kieron Quirke and based on Alex McBride's book, Defending The Guilty: Truth And Lies In The Criminal Courtroom.
The six-part series follows idealistic young barrister, Will Packham (the brilliant Will Sharpe), as he's "shown" the ropes by his cynical, worldly-wise pupil master Caroline, played by Bafta winner Katherine Parkinson.
Will must not only navigate his way through a criminal justice system seemingly designed to be as confusing as possible, but he's also required to deal with his fellow pupils, each of them after the same job at the end of their training and more than happy to stab each other in the back to get it.
Can he succeed and hold on to his principles? Or will the system claim another victim?
"It certainly raises questions about the legal system and moral questions," Sharpe (32) says of the show. "(My) character believes he is a good guy and he seems to be a good guy, but the series gradually puts that theory under strain."
"As Will knows, I really enjoyed playing somebody ostensibly with no redeeming qualities," chimes Parkinson (41) with a laugh. "Quite often I have played supposedly quite lovable characters and it turns out it comes quite easily to me to be utterly horrific.
Please log in or register with belfasttelegraph.co.uk for free access to this article.
"But I still think you feel sorry for her - and it's a good contrast with Will's idealism and youth," she says. "Caroline just operates in a very kind of 'legal' way."
So where does the comedy come in?
"Kieron really prioritises the plot," says Parkinson, who's well accustomed to the genre, thanks to her coveted role as Jen Barber in The IT Crowd.
"But it's a really clever thing to wrap up a case in half an hour and make it funny and have an ensemble playing.
"He makes that seem quite effortless, but it's doing a lot, and that's why I hope people will enjoy it.
"Some comedies lay out their stall, it's just going to make you laugh, but this is something that's supposed to be representing a world fairly accurately and hopefully asks questions, as well as mainly being funny."
"What I liked about it was that Tom George, the director, has very good taste," offers Sharpe, who earned his humour stripes with such shows as the self-penned - and darkly comic - Flowers.
"He gave us boundaries within which to work and it meant that we could feel quite mischievous, which is a really good atmosphere for comedy.
"So I definitely felt like that was a nice dynamic between us and the show, as a whole, and the shoot.
"Sometimes it felt like we were just being naughty just by playing the scene."
As for getting into character, the distinctive court dress certainly helped the London duo.
"I loved the gowns," quips Parkinson. "I found it very useful because it gave you an immediate status. Running down the stairs with it flowing behind you, it really does give you a sense of misplaced self-importance."
"I weirdly felt like it's quite a funny outfit, it's quite ridiculous in a way," Sharpe testifies.
"I mean the wigs are ridiculous and uncomfortable," Parkinson pitches in. "I just think some people look incredibly noble in a wig, and other people - me - just look really silly.
"What was the reason behind the wig?" she says, turning to her co-star.
"Did somebody say it was because all of them having the same wig somehow put them on an even...? I can't remember, but it is objectively absurd."
Costumes aside, the legal framework is simply there to service the characters and their stories, Sharpe determines.
"These are messy, human, flawed people in a messy, flawed system that was built by people, and that's what makes it funny, and that's what makes it interesting," he elaborates.
"These aren't superheroes, and this isn't as grand and austere a world as it might seem." he says. "It's run by people who are failing constantly and trying to stay on top of everything."
"I have always been interested in (the law)," admits Parkinson. "I did have aspirations to go into that world because - we were saying - it's pure theatre really. I say 'I toyed' - I also toyed with being an astronaut and a cat too," she says, smiling.
"But I think the subject I chose to study at university (Classics) was one where a lot of people went into diplomacy and law, but the idea of being a diplomat is so far-fetched to me.
"I don't think it was ever realistically within my reach."
Are there parallels to be drawn between the courtroom and acting, then?
"When you go up for parts as an actor, generally speaking, you have no idea who you've gone up against - and that's deliberate," Parkinson muses.
"Whereas it must be very different if you're a barrister, competing openly.
"I got into (acting) to get away from competition.
"It isn't competitive - particularly when you're doing theatre, for instance, you're doing something together.
"Sometimes I find the nature of filming can feel oddly competitive, but when it's comedy it never is, because it's always about the comedy that happens between you.
"I know from the outside it can look as if acting's a competitive world.
"And I know actors that make it that, but they're generally in LA. It's not been my experience."
Defending The Guilty, BBC Two, Tuesday, September 17, 10pm