| 7°C Belfast

Businesses challenging ‘disproportionate’ shutdown of beauty industry

A group representing close contact workers has applied for a judicial review which is set to be heard in court in Belfast later this week.

Close

(Liam McBurney/PA)

(Liam McBurney/PA)

(Liam McBurney/PA)

A group representing close contact workers will set out a case in court against the “disproportionate” and “arbitrary” shutdown of their businesses.

The Northern Ireland Executive announced that services such as hairdressers and beauticians were among a range of businesses required to close until November 13.

Barber and tanning shop owner Jason Shankey, Naomi Holmans of Roamer Health and Holistic Clinic, and Michelle Young of DKY Hair Company said they are taking a legal case on behalf of the “whole close contact industry”.

Close

Jason Shankey owner of Shankey Salon, Male Grooming, Hairdressing, Beauty and Sunbeds. PA Photo. Picture date: Tuesday October 27, 2020. See PA story ULSTER Coronavirus Challenge. Photo credit should read: Liam McBurney/PA Wire

Jason Shankey owner of Shankey Salon, Male Grooming, Hairdressing, Beauty and Sunbeds. PA Photo. Picture date: Tuesday October 27, 2020. See PA story ULSTER Coronavirus Challenge. Photo credit should read: Liam McBurney/PA Wire

PA

Jason Shankey owner of Shankey Salon, Male Grooming, Hairdressing, Beauty and Sunbeds. PA Photo. Picture date: Tuesday October 27, 2020. See PA story ULSTER Coronavirus Challenge. Photo credit should read: Liam McBurney/PA Wire

Solicitor Simon Chambers said they believe it will be the first such case to be heard in a UK court.

“We think that the decision to close the close contact sector was disproportionate and arbitrary,” he told the PA news agency.

“We sent a pre-action protocol letter on Thursday to the Department of Health, we filed papers yesterday seeking leave for judicial review and it has been listed for Thursday morning.

“We have a good strong team and we feel pretty confident that this is a case that should be aired and the Department of Health should be giving answers as to why this industry was closed down when there is no compelling evidence to justify that decision.

Close

Simon Chambers solicitor at Russell and Co. PA Photo. Picture date: Tuesday October 27, 2020. See PA story ULSTER Coronavirus Challenge. Photo credit should read: Liam McBurney/PA Wire

Simon Chambers solicitor at Russell and Co. PA Photo. Picture date: Tuesday October 27, 2020. See PA story ULSTER Coronavirus Challenge. Photo credit should read: Liam McBurney/PA Wire

PA

Simon Chambers solicitor at Russell and Co. PA Photo. Picture date: Tuesday October 27, 2020. See PA story ULSTER Coronavirus Challenge. Photo credit should read: Liam McBurney/PA Wire

“As far as I am aware, there have been various challenges but I can’t see anywhere in the UK where anyone has actually taken this to court yet. I think we might be the first.

“Time is of essence here, everyone is losing money hand over fist, everybody is closed down. A lot of people in the industry are self-employed, they are young, on minimum wage – even if they qualify for 60% of their pay, that is only 60% of minimum wage, they have got rent to pay.

“In just over two weeks’ time, the decision is being made whether to continue with lockdown. If nothing else this will bring to the attention of the Executive and Department of Health, this is an industry that shouldn’t be so easily dismissed.”

Earlier this week PA revealed that four barbers have threatened the Executive with legal action over the coronavirus restrictions.

Close

Sean Lawlor cutting the hair of a customer at Cambridge Barbershop on Belfast’s Lisburn Road (Liam McBurney/PA)

Sean Lawlor cutting the hair of a customer at Cambridge Barbershop on Belfast’s Lisburn Road (Liam McBurney/PA)

PA

Sean Lawlor cutting the hair of a customer at Cambridge Barbershop on Belfast’s Lisburn Road (Liam McBurney/PA)

Sean Lawlor of Cambridge Barbershop, Andrew Kavanagh of Camlough Barbers, David Lutton of The Corner Barbershop, and Padraig McShane of Cut N Edge stated their intention to challenge the Executive on the decision-making process that led to the regulations coming into force.

A scientific paper that guided the Executive’s decisions on the introduction of the circuit-break estimated the closure of hairdressers and beauticians could reduce the virus’s reproduction number (R number) by 0.05.

Other steps that would have had a greater projected impact, such as the closure of churches (estimated reduction of 0.1), were not taken by the Executive.

The group has launched an online fundraising effort to pay for the legal action which can be found at crowdjustice.com/case/close-contact-covid-fairness/

PA


Privacy