Belfast Telegraph

Dog cruelty case stalled over forensic sample delay

By Paul Higgins

The case against a man who is accused of killing and skinning a dog centres on a forensic sample, a court has heard.

William Mocsari (27) appeared yesterday at Newtownards Magistrates Court via video-link as a prosecuting lawyer sought a four-week adjournment because "the forensics in this matter are still not through".

However, defence barrister Chris Holmes said: "It's very straightforward; there either was or was not specific forensic evidence found at the scene."

Lamenting that "it's now taken 14 weeks" since Mocsari first appeared accused of causing unnecessary suffering to a dog, Mr Holmes added: "The sample taken could reveal a certain type of evidence but it may not reveal that evidence which is possible."

Mocsari is charged with causing unnecessary suffering to a dog on December 3 last year.

On two other bills of indictment, Mocsari has pleaded guilty to driving while banned and without insurance on December 1 and also on December 7, as well as having a knife on the latter day.

Yesterday in court Mr Holmes said if it transpired that forensic tests "do not reveal that evidence which is possible, we will be instructing a very specialised psychiatrist in relation to the admissions made by Mr Mocsari".

District Judge Mark Hamill remanded Mocsari back into custody to appear again on April 7.

Belfast Telegraph


From Belfast Telegraph