| 12.6°C Belfast

DUP councillor Audrey Wales’ spend on clothes during year as mayor causes further controversy

Close

Audrey Wales

Audrey Wales

Audrey Wales

A DUP councillor who spent more than £2,000 of ratepayers’ money on clothes during her year as mayor has caused controversy at a council meeting.

Audrey Wales has repaid £2,192 of expenses claimed during her year as mayor of Mid and East Antrim Borough Council for clothes.

The money was repaid “following internal review”, a Freedom of Information request stated.

An enquiry over “discrepancies” in expenses claims was tabled at this month’s meeting of the council by Bannside TUV councillor Timothy Gaston.

The reply from the local authority revealed that “following internal review, the elected member involved repaid the sum of £2,192.90 to council”.

Ms Wales said she could not comment as “this matter is under investigation”.

A breakdown of all councillor allowances for 2016/17 shows that during her mayoral year, Ms Wales was paid a basic allowance of £14,307, plus a special responsibility allowance of £1,272, mayoral allowance of £5,462 and travel and transport costs of £6,261.

Daily Headlines & Evening Telegraph Newsletter

Receive today's headlines directly to your inbox every morning and evening, with our free daily newsletter.

This field is required

Mr Gaston asked acting chief executive Philip Thompson to provide a detailed explanation as to why there are discrepancies between figures published for the mayoral year 2016/17 in two separate FoI requests.

A FoI request was received by the borough council on December 2 requesting details relating to the summary of expenses for Ms Wales.

The query requests copies of invoices relating to two items listed as “mayor miscellaneous” for £1,956.90 and £426 on October 18, 2016.

The local authority’s reply states that “following internal review, the elected member involved repaid the sum of £2,192.90 to council”.

Receipts provided to the council are for clothing to the tune of £225 from Precious Moments, Broughshane for an item in ivory colour; items from McKillen’s in Ballymena for £190 and four dresses and a coat from The Winsome Lady in Ballymoney costing £846.90.

There was a second receipt from The Winsome Lady for clothes costing £695, two skirts from Wallace’s in Ballymena costing £116, a ladies’ jacket, skirt, knitwear and top, also from Wallace’s, costing £310.

The other FoI request asks for a “breakdown cost of the annual clothing allowance for each mayor since the commencement of Mid and East Antrim”.

The response showed that Carrickfergus councillor Alderman Billy Ashe spent £394 on suits, shoes and suit hire, and Ms Wales spent £190 on shoes. Ms Ashe was Mayor of Mid and East Antrim from 2015 until 2016. His deputy was Mr Gaston.

There were no clothing expenses listed for former councillor Lindsay Millar, an Ulster Unionist representative, or Larne Lough DUP councillor Paul Reid.

Alliance councillor Robert Logan tabled a question asking for the total value of claims submitted for personal items (not travel) and monies paid to each Mid and East Antrim mayor from 2014/15 until 2020/2021 and if the council has ever received FoI requests relating to these claims.

Mr Logan was told in a written reply that both aspects of the question are available on the council website.

Speaking at a meeting of the borough council on Thursday evening, Mr Logan said the council’s website does not facilitate looking up FoI requests easily adding that there is “no complete index to indicate which month they are actually in” and asked for it to be “attended to”.

“The other issue is about the discrepancy in some of the figures which I think is being dealt with elsewhere,” he added.

Acting Chief Executive Philip Thompson said he would look at how the information is loaded and would get information to him.

Mr Gaston said he recalled that it had been clarified at a meeting that there was an allowance, £100/£200 for the deputy mayor and £400 for the mayor.

He asked for a copy of that guidance to be circulated to members “so that we know where we stand” and the “agreed policy is understood by the chamber”.

He asked for the date on which the money was repaid to be made available “for good housekeeping”,

“Once again, shameful the attention has been drawn and this is not directed at the member.”

Mr Gaston claimed that there was a cheque given but never cashed.

“That is an internal process that needs our immediate attention and I want reassurance from the acting director that once this investigation is done it comes back, it is laid bare what has gone wrong behind the scenes to get to where we are today.”


Top Videos



Privacy